Some major compromises are needed to achieve a lasting peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The duration of the conflict has, however, led to such engrained attitudes, policies, strategies and aims that compromises are extremely difficult. The number of people killed in the conflict is also a factor. Parties on both sides want to ensure that the dead did not die in vain. Here are the perspectives as seen by either side:
The Palestinian Perspective:
More Palestinians have been killed in the struggle than Israelis. The Palestinians have a greater weight on their shoulders to avenge deaths by gaining a sovereign state and other conditions. However, this also gives the Palestinians the greater desire for peace, because as the conflict goes on they will continue to be the biggest losers in terms of civilian casualties.
The Palestinians have also come to believe that Israel does not want peace, because of the provocative tactics during ceasefires and negotiations. Like the West Bank arrest raids during the recent ceasefire, and the current operation in Nablus, which has dampened hopes of restarting the stalled peace process: Israel's failure to adhere to previous peace deals, like the settlement expansions contrary to the U.S. brokered roadmap agreement, reinforces the Palestinian view.
As does the West Bank "security" wall that Israel is building. Mainly because the Palestinians negotiations rely on the formation of an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, the wall is well inside these borders in some places. Palestinian Negotiations Minister Saib Uraiqat said last year: "This is a policy of dictation and not negotiation, this prejudges and prejudices the outcome of permanent status negotiations."
This prevents the Palestinians from making any further concessions or compromises, because the concessions they have made in the past – like the Palestine Liberation Organization's recognition of Israel – have yielded nothing in return. In their resistance lies their dignity, and their dignity is almost all they have left.
The Israeli Perspective:
Israel has received heavy financial and military support from the U.S. throughout decades of conflict. Israelis may well doubt whether this would continue if they were no longer under threat from Palestinian terror. The U.S. supports Israel because it wants an ally in a position of supremacy in the vital Middle East region. But Israel also being threatened certainly makes it easier to explain to the U.S. public why heavy support is needed. The Israeli government also has strong remnants of the Zionist movement that was the driving force behind the creation of the Jewish state – on the very land so symbolically important to the Jewish faith. As Israeli academic and author Ilan Pape told me in a recent interview, "Israel is an unfinished project of statehood." The Zionists crave certain lands that they believe religious heritage has dictated for the final Jewish state, and hence Israel's reluctance to define borders. To this end, the conflict is necessary, because it diverts attention from Zionist transgressions and because the Palestinian threat begets strong security measures, like occupying Palestinian land whenever necessary, along with the land-annexing security wall. These measures are also extremely provocative, and fuel the vicious cycle of violence.
The wall has been deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice. And the United Nations Security Council has tried many times to issue resolutions against the high civilian death toll of Israeli military operations, occupations and Israel's transgression of human rights laws, as well as taking measures to bring about Israeli adherence to earlier resolutions. The U.S. has used its veto almost every time to prevent the Security Council from condemning Israel's activities. Over the years the unquestioning U.S. support for Israel has become engrained in Washington’s psyche.