Today on Blogcritics
Home » Film » DVD Review: Death Race 3: Inferno

DVD Review: Death Race 3: Inferno

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Death Race 3: Inferno, director Roel Reine’s follow-up to his Death Race 2, itself a prequel to Paul W.S. Anderson’s Death Race (2008), picks up where the previous movie ended and ends where the original begins. Carl Lucas (Luke Goss) has been “rebuilt” after his apparent death in a fiery crash, transformed into the masked driver Frankenstein, the star of a deadly sport played by condemned prisoners in the privatized prisons of businessman Weyland (Ving Rhames).

As the new movie starts, Weyland’s corporation suffers a hostile take-over by Niles York (Dougray Scott), who has plans to franchise Death Race at multiple locations around the world. The first off-shoot is scheduled for South Africa, and Lucas and his crew are shipped overseas for a grueling three-day contest in the desert.

Inferno gains what originality it has from the shift in location, taking advantage of the desert landscape as well as African townships which give it visual echoes of the social upheavals which accompanied the end of the apartheid regime. The sketched in character conflicts involve, on the one side, the crew’s resentment of Lucas’s having kept his survival a secret (something he had to do to protect them) and on the other side, York’s increasing interference in the race which threatens the success of the franchise as he becomes too personally involved.

Anderson’s original film was a reworking of Paul Bartel’s 1975 satirical action-comedy Death Race 2000 as a grim dystopian commentary on current social trends (the privatization and monetizing of the U.S. penal system, the rise of increasingly violent “sports” like MMA, the Internet’s insatiable consumption of graphic content). It was one of the best and most visceral action films of the decade, its impact deriving from the director’s decision to go with real vehicles and stunts rather than CG, and his ability to stage, shoot and edit the action in such a way that no matter how chaotic it got, the viewer could always tell what was happening and what the relationships were between the various drivers.

While Reine continues this non-CG approach, however, his editors chop the action up into such fragments that the cutting defeats the purpose – what we get is a visual frenzy which obscures rather than reveals what’s going on. On his enthusiastic commentary track on the disk, Reine asserts that he prefers to cover action in extended shots which clearly display the stunts being performed, implying that this slice-and-dice approach represents what he and his producers believe is what audiences want. But despite this, Reine isn’t just a direct-to-video hack: he gets decent performances from his cast and, as his own cameraman, he has an excellent eye for dynamic imagery. In fact, it’s the look of the movie which is most significant as it illustrates dramatically what is now possible with the latest digital cameras.

Shot primarily with new Red Epic cameras, the film has a richly cinematic look which belies its small budget (just $6.5 million). The sensitivity of the new chips allows for effective low- and natural-light shooting, with a remarkable contrast range (shooting directly into bright lights doesn’t blow out the image the way it used to on video). And more importantly for an action movie like this, these cameras provide the kind of fast-paced shooting which allows Reine to create large-scale action on a very tight schedule – principal photography took just four weeks, with an additional two weeks of shooting with a reduced crew for all the desert driving sequences. Reine claims he does 85-90 set-ups a day, often with multiple cameras, generating a lot of material to work with.

As theatrical features are now almost exclusively shot on hi-def digital video, the use of this equipment closes the production gap between big budget movies and cheaper direct-to-disk product. While Death Race 3: Inferno is itself basically just a slick popcorn movie, it represents interesting new possibilities for low-budget filmmaking. Reine’s movie looks as polished and visually textured as Anderson’s $45 million Death Race; the only difference exists at the creative level, with a weaker script and less coherent editing.

The Universal DVD supplies an excellent picture with dynamic sound, as well as a number of extras. The most significant is that commentary track with director Roel Reine, a Dutch director transplanted to South Africa, who has some interesting comments about shooting in the black townships around Cape Town, with echoes of the violence of the apartheid era. The track is rich in technical details. As Reine explains, one of the advantages of digital equipment is the advent of cheap, “disposable” hi-def cameras which can be placed in dangerous positions in and around the stunt vehicles to provide what would previously have been impossible shots – he mentions at least once salvaging a memory card from a camera melted in a vehicle fire and retrieving a shot from within the explosion. This kind of thing would previously have had to be simulated by CG, resulting in a less visceral effect.

About K. George

I have been a film editor for some twenty years, cutting shorts and features, drama and documentary, theatrical and television. Since my earliest memories of movies — watching Omar Sharif as Ghengis Khan, Ursula Andress as She in the Odeon or Regent or Pavilion in Chelmsford, Essex, in the early ’60s, or catching King Kong or Quatermass 2 on a small black and white television in our living room in White Roding — what engaged me, and still engages me, is story and the techniques of storytelling. Even in my documentary work, the concern is always with how to shape the material into a compelling narrative. When I returned to school in my mid-20s, I started hanging out at the University of Winnipeg student newspaper office and eventually became the weekly film reviewer — an excellent gig because it meant I got to see a lot of movies for free. No doubt that experience helped when I fortuitously got an opportunity to go to Los Angeles and interview David Lynch and many of his collaborators on the production of Eraserhead for an article for Cinefantastique. And that article in turn landed me a job on the production of Lynch’s Dune, a remarkable six months in Mexico helping to document the day-to-day details of production on one of the most expensive movies ever made. Eventually returning to Winnipeg, I wrote fairly regularly about film and other matters for Border Crossings, an arts quarterly. And then, in 1989, I joined the Winnipeg Film Group and set about making my own first film, a 9-minute comedy in the form of a dubious documentary called Incident at Pickerel Fillet. This was followed by a short piece in a collaborative project called The Exquisite Corpse, and then a more ambitious comedy parodying old-style sci-fi movie serials called The Adventures of Stella Starr of the Galaxy Rangers in the 23rd Century. These experiences led inexorably to a career in film editing, mostly on documentaries. Over the years, I have also sporadically continued writing — a number of unfilmed scripts, plus a brief history of the Winnipeg Film Group for Cinema Scope, and most recently a chapter on filmmaker John Kozak in the WFG’s anthology about Winnipeg directors, Place.
  • jim

    Did you see the shot at the end when the girl sat down…whoo whoo!!!