Maybe some of you pinkos can help me here. I don’t really like President Bush that good. I want to say bad things about him, be good loyal opposition and all, but I’m having a hard time right at the moment. A lot has been going right for him recently, starting with that catching Saddam thing.
Particularly, getting Gaddafi to open Libya up to weapons inspectors, throwing open the doors, and voluntarily destroying bunches of chemical weapons, and shutting down a surprisingly advanced nuclear program looks awfully good on President Bush. On the surface, it looks like him knocking off the Baathists has made a big payoff here on the side.
Now, this isn’t right. President Bush didn’t do anything to cause this. He should get NO credit at all for this breakthrough, and it’s nothing anyway. Right? Don’t make me give this SOB credit for making the world safer. I won’t do it.
Come on, some of you pinkos and Bush haters help me out. I’m drowning here. I can’t figure out any reasonable explanation except to say that the hawkish policies of the Bush administration have led directly to this major voluntary disarming of an ugly dictator. There HAS to be some explanation that makes Dubya look bad.
I just can’t find it.Powered by Sidelines