In the quest to remove any and all obstacles and delays in the race for a woman (or girl) to get an abortion, abused women have been forgotten. Abusive men were coercing women against their will to get abortions. Bringing down the full force of constitutional law to make it not only constitutional to kill one's unborn child, but to be able to do so as fast as possible, has made it possible for women to be abused in the process.
First, Planned Parenthood apparently covers up obvious cases of abuse. Bill O'Reilly recently made news for getting in a medical records controversy about underage girls getting abortions. While the scandal is about how O'Reilly got the records, what has been overlooked is how underage girls are getting impregnated by presumably overage men and there are no reports made. Kansas, like most other states, requires all cases of suspected child abuse be reported to authorities. Planned Parenthood has argued in court that such requirements violate the privacy rights of those underage girls. The result is that these girls are left to be abused by overage men.
Second, women are coerced to get abortions. I know this because I personally know women it has happened to. Other testimonials and stories are freely available in the news and on the web. By eliminating even the most sensible restrictions such as parental notification (note that is not parental consent), a woman can be rushed to have an abortion and no questions will be asked. This is a boon to men who don't want to pay child support, don’t want to "lose face" for having a child, or want to cover up for their crimes of impregnating a minor. Coerced abortions are a problem.
However, laws such as HB 5882 in Michigan are a profoundly bad idea. Instead of going after coerced abortions by preventing them, it makes it a crime for a man to even be involved in the decision-making process in any way except for complete deferral. It's another attempt to separate men from children. "Constitutional" law says men have no say in the decision to get an abortion. This law says they aren't even allowed to speak on the subject. Considering the current state of child support laws and custody laws, apparently the only thing men can contribute is their paycheck and all other effort is disallowed.
Sure, the law could catch men who engage in coercion. However, how such violations would ever be proven is a problem since it is entirely a "speech crime." Further, "battered woman syndrome" suggests that the women most in need of protection are least likely to seek help and the redress that such a law would allow. In short, more innocent men would be prosecuted than true domestic abusers who ought to be nailed to the wall.
The problem is not that there are no laws to punish coercion, there are. The problem is the weight of the Constitution being brought down to rush women through abortion mills without question. Planned Parenthood has no incentive to slow or stop abortions while they get paid to perform those procedures.
Taking the typical image the pro-abortion crowd likes to use, imagine an abused woman (or girl) who has an abusive boyfriend or family. She discovers she is pregnant and she knows her family or boyfriend will be livid once they discover the pregnancy. She is lonely, scared and has no place to turn. In come the knights in crimson-stained armor, Planned Parenthood. They pledge to help this young woman and bring her into their clinic. They abort the child and send her on her way. The problem is they send her right back into the abusive situation she came from. The problem wasn't the child, the problem was the abusive relationships that remain unaddressed until the next time she gets pregnant and Planned Parenthood wants to make a buck.
It is the failure of "constitutional" law that leaves these women prey to abusive and coercive relationships. The solution is not more bad laws but to rethink the culture of drive-thru abortions.Powered by Sidelines