Today on Blogcritics
Home » Domesticating Torture Creates New Jobs

Domesticating Torture Creates New Jobs

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

With the United States reopening the case of Maher Arar to determine if he was sent to Syria to be tortured, it got me thinking.

Outsourcing torture has long been an issue with American governments. Outsourcing has taken place both in the form of outsourcing the actual individuals doing the torturing, meaning using an Egyptian or an Afghani or a Syrian to do the torturing, or in the form of outsourcing the location used for the torturing, such as Guantanamo Bay or Abu Ghraib or Hong Kong.

The presidents of the United States have long stuck by the same message: “We do not torture.” Reagan said it with his message to the Senate in 1988. Clinton ratified the UN Convention to Congress in 1994 and used similar language to Reagan, using four diplomatic reservations focused on one word: “mental.”

Yes, most American presidents and governments have continued to uphold this stance with clarity and without contention or quibbling.

President Bush has repeated it consistently throughout his tenure, often whispering under his breath the slight addition: “But we know someone who does.”

Of course, Bush knows as we all know that America is at war and must do whatever it takes to protect its citizens. That means getting the terrorists and possible terrorists and possible potential terrorists and their families and friends and physicians and mail carriers and bartenders and barbers and neighbours and teachers and priests and foot massagers as far away from American soil as humanly possible.

I think this is a mistake.

With the economy looking to be in less than ideal shape, outsourcing should be the last thing on American minds at this point and time. By pushing torture outside of America in an effort to duck regulations, American officials are making a serious mistake in protecting what could be a burgeoning job market.

With auto plant shutdowns and huge warehouses sitting empty, the potential for torture chambers and secret interrogation locations that the entire population knows about is ripe for the picking. Plus, there’s ample parking!

And most people know a retired mill worker or crane operator with a lot of free time on his or her hands. Why not dispatch some of our nation’s more industrious individuals to a new and exciting vocation in protecting American freedoms? That guy who lost three fingers in the band saw would be perfect! Just think of the intimidation someone like that could foster with a simple steely glare.

Of course, in order to domesticate torture, officials would have to consider changing the semantics. Torture does, after all, carry somewhat negative connotations even if America is at war.

Individuals working in the field could serve with titles such as “Creative Coercions Officer” or “Trendelenburg Supervisor” and save any awkward moments explaining their new vocation to family members or friends. Plus, future presidents could still stand rigidly by the concise assertion that the United States doesn’t torture without quibbling over details. Changing the terms changes the idea.

Wages and benefits would naturally be equal to or greater than most fast-food benefits, offering a skilled “Creative Coercions Officer” the opportunity to still receive some of the medical benefits those he or she coerces will receive free of charge. By opening up doors of equality, more individuals long forgotten by outdated and outmoded occupations will be renewed afresh in the job market.

Naturally for some, the addition of new jobs in the torture sector will create somewhat of a domestic stir. Pesky human rights groups may object to the United States’ protecting of its own citizens on its own soil for once, but a few hours with the Trendelenburg Supervisor should change all of that.

Powered by

About Jordan Richardson

  • bliffle

    Torture doesn’t work. You never get any useful information. Just ask our own guys who have been tortured. Ask John McCain: did torture make you reveal USA secret plans? No. Soldiers are usually pretty resolute.

    Our best interrogator of Viet Cong prisoners during the Vietnam war stated this unequivocally: torture doesn’t work. The only thing that works is empathy.

    All you accomplish with torture is to employ torturers.

    It also turns decent peopple into torturers. It’s the competitive effect. You have to become a ‘good’ torturer to advance and get promotions. The boss himself is a torturer and judges you. Lacking any real accomplishments what matters is your adherence to the torturers orthodoxy and your enthusiasm for supporting torture. Mob psychology.

    Torture doesn’t work, and it leads to corruption and ineffectiveness of the society.

    Those who support torture are traitors to their society: they accomplish nothing and discredit their politics.

  • http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/39420/joanne_huspek.html Joanne Huspek

    There are several empty warehouses in Detroit you could use. Say, could you shoot a quick email to Governor Jen about the possibility? Or maybe drop a line to Jeff Daniels and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation?

  • http://canadiancinephile.com/ Jordan Richardson

    Waste not, want not. I’m on it.

  • Ruvy

    One hopes this is a satire: when unemployment gets bad enough, even breaking someone else’s knees for information is a job that can put food on the table.

  • Cindy D

    What happened to Ruvy’s post? I see it in “fresh comments” but not here.

  • Ruvy

    My comment is there, Cindy. There just ain’t a whole lot of comment. It’s right above yours

  • Cindy D

    me<—blinks

    I swear it wasn’t there all morning. I was looking at that since 7:30 a.m.

    Oh well, you know what they say about eye witness testimony.

  • http://www.EurocriticsMagazine.com Christopher Rose

    No, Ruvy’s post definitely wasn’t there earlier. I’ve asked our tech supremo to look into it…

  • http://canadiancinephile.com/ Jordan Richardson

    Well Ruvy, it does say it’s a satire, but these days you can never be too sure.