Today on Blogcritics
Home » Do Spiritual Naturalists Believe in God?

Do Spiritual Naturalists Believe in God?

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Path through woods at Grand RapidsThat depends on what you mean by God. Do you believe in divinity consistent with the latest findings in modern science, free of superstition and supernaturalism? Or do you prefer to leave “God” out of the picture, but still lead a spiritual life close to nature? If either is true, chances are Spiritual Naturalism agrees with you.

This perspective, also called Religious Naturalism, embraces the natural universe as revealed by modern science, while cultivating an attitude of awe and reverence toward nature. Supernatural interpretations of God or gods are left behind, in favor of a general reverence toward our breathtaking universe.

From the chrysalis of the butterfly to the destructive power of the black hole, the universe is awesome in grandeur. Some Spiritual Naturalists feel such awe in beholding its beauty, they can find no more appropriate word to call it than “God.” Others forego theological language, but are just as moved, and partake in the same experience of the mysterium tremendum described by Rudolf Otto as the characteristic religious feeling.

There are many today in traditional religions as well as outside them who take a naturalistic view. For example, among Christian theologians, Paul Tillich and Bishop Spong both espouse a view of God that is essentially naturalistic. Jewish naturalists include Mordecai Kaplan and Sherwin Wine. Buddhism finds many naturalists, Stephen Batchelor and the Thai monk Buddhadasa being just a few. Taoism has long espoused a philosophy that is basically naturalistic, based on the Tao Te Ching and the writings of Shuang-zi. Contemporary Paganism counts many naturalists in its fold, with some discussing the idea explicitly in the Yahoo group Naturalistic Paganism and on the community blog Humanistic Paganism.

Outside traditional religions, there are also those by-passing God-talk altogether to speak directly of awe for nature. A Google search for “Religious Naturalism”, “Spiritual Naturalism”, or “Spiritual Humanism” reveals a plethora of sites devoted to precisely that. There are also many authors bringing this idea to life, such as Ursula Goodenough, Chet Raymo, Loyal Rue, Jerome Stone, Michael Hogue, and Donald Crosby.

If you are looking for a transcendent God that stands outside the world and intervenes though miracles, you probably aren’t going to be happy as a Spiritual Naturalist. But if what you seek is a God immanent in the world, a God you can see and touch and feel, a God that doesn’t demand you believe strange things but rather empowers you to discover the world for yourself, then Spiritual Naturalism may be what you’ve been looking for.

Powered by

About B. T. Newberg

  • jason

    I believe in nature’s God and science is one way to learn about the creation. Science is a method of separating objective fact from opinion. There are things that are outside of the perview of science. The scientific method allows us to create a procedure that, if followed by anyone in the world, will recreate the exact same results. Then we can say that we understand something about the world. Einstein famously said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. The point of science is to always get the same result.
    The scientific method is not applicable to spiritual belief, at least not yet. Maybe someday we will have learned enough to test our spirituality. One hundred years ago radio would have been considered magic.

  • http://humanisticpaganism.wordpress.com/ B. T. Newberg

    Thanks for the comment, Jason.

    The scientific method is not appropriate to belief in general, except beliefs about how the universe appears to be. As for beliefs about what matters most in life, or what is “true” in the artistic sense, there’s no way to test and verify the “best” way to believe.

    Yet science does have important things to say regarding spirituality. Philosopher Loyal Rue says that all religions answer two questions: what’s real, and what matters. Science gives us a good idea of what appears to be real, so it has something to contribute to religion, even if it is not the final arbiter of every aspect.

  • sona

    have a read and share