Today on Blogcritics
Home » Cutler Was Traded Because He Failed the Patriot Way

Cutler Was Traded Because He Failed the Patriot Way

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Jay Cutler was jettisoned to Chicago to play for the Bears not because he didn’t want to work in Denver any longer but because the Broncos — mainly new coach Josh McDaniels and owner Pat Bowlen — thought Cutler’s attitude was self absorbed and a threat to poison that delicate but critical winning element called team chemistry.

McDaniels might still be scratching his head that his former quarterback, whom many league experts label a franchise-caliber player, threw a tantrum that never stopped after rumors surfaced that the team was interested in the price tag on former Patriots’ and now Chiefs’ signal caller Matt Cassel.

That bit of window shopping left Cutler feeling betrayed. Only problem, this wasn’t a romantic relationship. It was business. Pro football is fun and games for fans but it’s also business to owners and coaches, the latter who need to win quickly and keep winning to retain their job and income. Coaches don’t take to ego massaging easily or willingly.

While the question can certainly be asked “why would the Broncos be interested in Cassel when they already had one of the bright young stars at the position” it is also immaterial because in the end, Cutler was still the team’s big man on campus.

The Broncos tried, although reportedly without much feeling, to repair the hole in Cutler’s heart, or ego, but principle had been violated obviously in Cutler’s mind so he and his agent (never on a team’s Christmas card list) Bus Cook created a storm to the point where it seemed a trade made sense. It didn’t from a talent standpoint but by the end the acrimony was so heated a move likely had to be consummated.

McDaniels may have thought back to his days and the mega-success the Patriots had under coach Bill Belichick. The Boss of those three Super Bowl triumphs is a no-nonsense, button-down, all-about-team-first, none-of-this-diva act from individuals type of man. He doesn’t tolerate individualism. He appreciates talent but the ego tripping is not just frowned upon it’s scorned.

Case in point — Randy Moss. Did you see shenanigans out of him after he arrived in Foxboro? He knew better. He knew his act of youth and indiscretion and Minnesota and Oakland would not fly with Belichick or that franchise culture. Terrell Owens would never be invited to Patriot Town.

“I would say that New England mindset certainly played a role after the (Cutler-McDaniels) relationship began to deteriorate” said Dave Krieger, a longtime columnist in Denver, now writing for the Denver Post. “From the outside it appeared that McDaniels was more intent on demonstrating his authority than ameliorating the situation. (Former head coach Mike) Shanahan would have sat down with Cutler and thrashed it out. Cutler would have participated because he trusted Shanahan.”

McDaniels knows that a team can’t have a player being a bigger voice than the team, than the coach so when Cutler’s disappointment and act couldn’t be reigned in, Bowlen wasn’t going to be embarrassed that his coach was being tested. The Broncos’ Money Man stepped in and allowed McDaniels and general manager Brian Xander to seek out a trade.

The question many fans wondered about was what if McDaniels had apologized to Cutler for talking to the Patriots about Cassel. Would falling on the sword have healed the rift or would it have cost a young coach credibility with the rest of his team?

“I think he would have lost credibility had he apologized for engaging in trade talks but not if he had apologized for mishandling the situation,” Krieger said. “Honesty goes a long way — the the general public and with football players too.”

Finding a hungry team in Chicago a deal was struck giving the Bears a late Christmas present, the one they had desired for years. The Broncos gave up something very valuable, a playmaking quarterback, but they did fetch quite a price for him too in a draft picks booty.

Cutler is not a cancer. He just reacted poorly. He and the Bears will be a strong match. The heat is on the Broncos. They are forced to prove they can draft astutely for this move to work out in their favor. If Cutler excels and wins big and the Broncos’ draft picks bust or are marginal producers at best this decision could haunt their franchise for years.

The 2009 draft is almost here. The Broncos get a No. 1 in 2010 too. Player evaluation. Character evaluation. Two classes the franchise must pass with A’s to avoid the media backlash it fears if Cutler goes on to star for the Bears and the Broncos offense proves inept or hardly explosive like when Cutler was driving.

Powered by

About Michael Toebe on Behavior, Culture & Relationships

  • mike

    No. You are wrong.

    Actually McDaniels is practicing the “Belichick Way”, not the “Patriots Way”. One snag, though- McDaniels ain’t Belichick. Frankly, none of Belichick’s proteges have had a whole lot of success helming their own teams in the NFL. Can you take a guess as to why? Because they ain’t Bill Belichick. There’s only one Bill Belichick.

    Now here’s a kid, McDaniels, who got rid of a man, Cutler, who not one, not ONE, of his teammates or coaches at any level had ever said anything bad about except that he had a temper forged by a real desire to win football games. Pouter? Not until this. Selfish? Not until this. Locker room diva? Not until this. Huh? I wonder what in the world got into him?

    And by the way- it IS a business. You sports writers can’t have it both ways- if a guy felt he was being lied to and mistreated by his bosses, he can’t express displeasure with management? If a player has the ability and leverage to enact positive change for his career, he can’t, but a GM or coach that thinks in the exact same manner as it relates to their careers has carte blanche to say whatever they have to or do whatever they have to in the name of business?

    Cutler decided he didn’t want to play in this situation because his new boss was a dick and he had the leverage to enact change for the betterment of his long term career. If this had been any one of your friends, you would have applauded the move and taken him out for drinks. Cutler took care of his business and his career with cold and quick efficiency. NOW THAT’S BUSINESS.

  • twodogs

    As I stated within the first couple of weeks of this incident. Jay-dude: “take the money and run”.

    Everyone is telling you to quit complaining, this is just football business.

    I say McDaniels would throw Cutler under the bus in a New York second and getting out of Denver was the best thing for Cutler.

    Now McDaniels must prove to Denver fans that he is a man of his word. He starts off his Head-Coaching career by losing a proven young QB, and also has an integrity issue with his football players.

  • YAWN

    This is OLD news. Dude the horse is dead stop beating it you look like a moron.

  • Jason O.

    It’s quite amusing that the anti-Cutler position seems to be an interesting redefinition of a “business” relationship:

    1) Employer can do whatever he pleases.
    2) If employee does not swallow employer’s actions whole without a peep (regardless of past performance or any other circumstances) he is “whining.”

    Let’s review: McDaniels trying to move Cutler behind the scenes (i.e., lying in his statements about Cutler after taking the job) is “just a part of the business of pro football.”

    Yet Cutler forcing a trade is “unprofessional” and “self absorbed.”

    Sorry. Try Again.