Will the real John Kerry stand up please - Page 2

All this while true war heroes like Senator John McCain were being tortured and sodomized at the hands of communists in prisoner of war camps.

Senator John Kerry also participated in demonstrations where soldiers would throw their medals on the steps of Congress. Though he did throw medals, the ones he threw were not his own. His medals hang proudly in his Senate office.

What one does years ago is one thing, and can be forgiven. But you cannot discount the un-American tone of his protesting. He now goes on pretending to be proud of his Vietnam war experience and has made jabs at President Bush's lack of active service in Vietnam.

You cannot have it both ways. You cannot protest the war while at the same time using your service as a flower in your vest to dress up what really is an un-American, anti CIA and military past.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Eryk

    Feb 03, 2004 at 11:00 am

    Just out of curiosity, what good is it to be pro-war if you don't have the courage to actually fight? Kerry's country called and he answered. Doesn't this, the experience of having fought and witnessed these terrible things for the sake of America, give one the right to speak their mind? You call Kerry un-American but he did what he was asked to do. I don't see how your spin of the situation goes to return any credibility to George Bush. "Look! Kerry's a coward too!" isn't really going to swing my vote one way or the other.

  • 2 - Tom

    Feb 03, 2004 at 11:06 am

    It's not spin, it's fact. He did protest the war.

    I never called him un-American I said he acted un-American.

    And I guess you are implying that GW didnt' really serve his country because he was only in the National Guard.

    Tell that to all the National Guard and Reservists who are fighting in Iraq and to the families of those reservists and National Guardists who died.

  • 3 - J Marsh

    Feb 03, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    The right to protest for or against the things we believe in are rights granted to us by the Constitution and he Bill of Rights. The fact that Senator Kerry also fought, and shed blood, in a foreign war defending these same rights gives him a broader perspective on war in general and the Vietnam war in particular.
    I am really getting tired of people who think that it is un-American to disagree with the way our government is handling our domestic and foreign affairs. It is every Americans duty as well as their right to speak up when we are not satisfied with the way things are being handled. The fact that John Kerry is taking the time and energy to run for President so he can better effect the changes he and his supporters think are necessary to ensure fairness from our government makes him very American.

  • 4 - Hal Pawluk

    Feb 03, 2004 at 1:30 pm

    I never called him un-American I said he acted un-American.

    So if I were to say you were acting like a, for example, Fascist, I wouldn't be saying you were a Fascist?

    Wow. Personally, I wouldn't buy that, but chacun a son gout.

  • 5 - Tom

    Feb 03, 2004 at 2:14 pm

    The right to protest does not mean you have to right to be free from criticism.

    If he did act in a way contrary to his duties as a commander-in-chief that might bring into question his ability to manage the armed services.

  • 6 - Tom Johnson

    Feb 03, 2004 at 2:24 pm

    The problem is that Kerry is acting like he's really proud of his actions in the military, while he was never proud of it before. He's using something he was ashamed enough of about which to write a book that rails against it, yet when it will boost his standings he's just fine with it. That's hypocrisy.

  • 7 - Eryk

    Feb 03, 2004 at 5:35 pm

    I think proud to have served and proud to have participated in war are two entirely different things. Is war something a nation, any nation, should be proud of?

    I still don't see the point you are trying to make. Having served in the military and fought in a war makes one an unfit commander-in-chief yet being an AWOL National Guardist does. Some crazy logic, there.

    The right to protest doesn't exempt one from criticism, no. But, you've been so brainwashed by the post-9/11 media that you don't even see how inherently un-American your own words are. America is about change, growth, and moving forward. America is about questions and pluralism. America is about standing up for what you believe in.

    Knocking John Kerry for refusing live as an American Lemming and fight, work, and die on command for the sake of Le Gouvernement is insane. I don't know the man, but I find it insulting that you would attempt to sully anyone's reputation, not for the Government, not even for America, but for George Bush. Explain that to all the National Guard and Reservists who are fighting in Iraq.

  • 8 - Jackson Brown

    Feb 04, 2004 at 6:04 pm

    John Kerry is a big part of why the troops who served in Viet Nam were met with extreme hostility...often being spat upon.

    THAT is the reason he deserves criticism...period.

    His 4 months on a patrol boat did NOT give him the "perspective" to attack the American troops about things he NEVER witnessed. Like in all wars, some troops do horrible things...but Kerry and the VVAW created a BROAD hatred for ALL soldiers of that era.

    I am not brain washed, I was there, demonstrating against the war. However, many who saw the war as wrong had the common sense to see that the troops -- nearly a million that served -- were being attacked and treated in a vile manner for years, in large part because Kerry and his group.

    I remember that time well. If you wore a uniform, you were likely to be verbally assaulted. We knew the difference between the policy makers and the troops who had no choice but to go or become a criminal.

    Kerry's actions and speeches attacking the troops were UN-AMERICAN...period!

  • 9 - Rick

    Feb 11, 2004 at 8:20 am

    I would have a lot more respect for Kerry if he had thrown his own medals over the White House fence. What a hypocrite.

    Is the proud American serving his country, which he claims, or the shamed soldier who killed women and children, which he claimed a few years back?

  • 10 - JR

    Feb 11, 2004 at 10:19 am

    ...the troops who served in Viet Nam were met with extreme hostility...often being spat upon.

    Urban myth.

  • 11 - Bob

    Feb 14, 2004 at 9:49 am

    ...the troops who served in Viet Nam were met with extreme hostility...often being spat upon.

    Urban myth.

    Urban myth? I am a Viet Nam vet.....don't try to rewrite my history! The only thong that stopped my harrasment when I got back was bashing a few heads.

  • 12 - JEANMARRY

    Mar 13, 2004 at 11:44 am

    hello
    the Mondial site for the Peace of Jeanmarry Grandpa with a Great man JOHN KERRY helps me while playing at Granpa, "I can shout" jeanmarry more extremely

  • 13 - John Weiss

    Apr 04, 2004 at 6:33 am

    Did you serve or are you serving your country? If not then sit down and shut up coward. If so, you must not have seen the serious shit that went down. I was there, and if you thought it was a just war then you must be messed up in the head. Sorry the union kept you from seeing your favorite television program.

  • 14 - Mac Diva

    Apr 04, 2004 at 12:38 pm

    It seems to me that John Kerry is being criticized for growing as a person. I find nothing all that odd about him being first a soldier (a volunteer I think) and then deciding the war he fought in was being waged for the wrong reasons. Nor does it strike me as hypocritical that he is proud to have been willing to fight for his country, though he now believes he fought in an unjust war. What I see is a complex, intelligent person being misjudged by people who are not up to the task of understanding him.

  • 15 - Jeanmarry click ling please

    Jun 12, 2004 at 5:52 pm

    THE SITE PEACE GRANPA FOR UNICEF

  • 16 - Jeanmarry PEACE click ling please

    Jun 20, 2004 at 5:31 pm

    The site Peace Granpa Jeanmarry NEW VIDEO!! NEW VIDEO!! JOHN KERRY

  • 17 - JEANMARRY PEACE NOT WITH THE CHILDREN SOLDIER

    Jun 27, 2004 at 10:19 am

    NOT !!The CHILDREN SOLDIERS The HEART OF The WORLD The CHILDREN EAST IN DANGER!! (UNICEF)

  • 18 - John Kerry John Edwards two men for the peace of the world

    Jul 07, 2004 at 3:47 am

    John Edwards speaks the heart of America – hope and optimism. He is a lifelong champion for America’s families who has shown courage and conviction standing up for America’s values. In the Senate, he has a record of reaching across Party lines and working to reform our intelligence, to combat bioterrorism and keep our military strong. Together, we will campaign tirelessly across the country – fighting to build an America that is stronger at home and respected in the world.
    See the continuation Click the ling please

  • 19 - Tom

    Jul 07, 2004 at 8:36 am

    You can believe that if you will. John Edwards is an opportunistic trial lawyer whose lawsuits against doctors and companies have cost people jobs and led to higher costs for health care and products we use every day.

    What is reallly sad is that you are relying on the "strength' of the VEEP choice to bolster your boring, weak candidate, John Kerry.

  • 20 - James Tittle

    Jul 25, 2004 at 8:31 pm

    Kerry is an opportunist politician who cannot make up his mind on anything. It's a scary thing to even imagine that he could be president. Taxes will soar, the economy will topple, and the defense of our country will be non-existant. Be wary!

  • 21 - Michael Ashbury

    Aug 05, 2004 at 10:28 am

    Book Surge, LLC PRESS RELEASE
    [edited]

    EXPLOSIVE NEW POLITICAL BOOK! ?Who is the REAL John Kerry?? by Michael Ashbury, illustrates John Kerry?s lack of leadership experience and character to lead this great country.[remainder of sales pitch deleted]

  • 22 - Hal Pawluk

    Aug 05, 2004 at 11:54 am

    George W. Bush is "an opportunistic politician who" is in the thrall of neoconservatives on foreign policy and big business and rich campaign contributors on everything else.

  • 23 - Hal Pawluk

    Aug 05, 2004 at 11:57 am

    Who is the REAL Michael Ashbury?

    And what on earth qualifies him to comment on Kerry? Please include all political affiliations when responding.

  • 24 - Tom

    Aug 05, 2004 at 4:09 pm


    Where is the comment editor. Please delete these spam comments #21, #24.

    I don't appreciate not being able edit out shitheads comment spamming my entries.

  • 25 - Justene

    Aug 05, 2004 at 4:56 pm

    the comment editor went to lunch and apologizes for her dereliction of duty.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs