Wi-fi Nation: a terrific map

Author: KaiserPublished: Aug 03, 2005 at 12:18 am 3 comments

Here is one terrific map, courtesy of Ray Vella at Business Week. Great job!

Wifinationsm

This map works on two levels:

  • The red and green dots provide strong visual cues to support the conclusion that Wi-Fi networks are being widely deployed across American cities, except in the mid-west
  • The three shades of brown show the number of networks installed or planned in each state.  Inclusion of such state-level information justifies the printing of state boundaries.  Without plotting state-level information, state boundaries become chartjunk, as in the heat wave maps I've previously discussed.

What's more, we can assimilate the city and state levels. For example, focusing on Texas, we see from the dark brown shade that it is a state with many networks, and then from the dots, we can see further where those networks are.

A few minor improvements could be made:

  • Tell us the upper bound of the legend, and name the legend. By changing 10+ to 10-X, the designer not only provides us another piece of data but
    also harmonizes the presentation with the other two categories. Besides, the legend needs a title
  • Be more friendly to the color-blind: the red-green contrast should be avoided as much as possible. If a graphic designer is reading the blog, please tell us where we can find studies of color contrasts
  • Use a softer national boundary: the solid black line sticks out against the soft background and it is the least important bit on the map
  • Wifihistogram One would expect the choice of three shades of brown and the intervals used for each shade to be keyed to the frequency histrogram of the number of networks (shown right). The current division divides the 50 states into groups of 8, 16 and 26. Are there better divisions?

Finally, most readers will find the number of networks to be a dissatisfactory metric because more populous states will likely install more networks.  A density measure such as networks per person or per household or per unit area would have been more telling.

Reference: "Wi-Fi Nation", Business Week, Aug 1 2005, p.12.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Phillip Winn

    Aug 03, 2005 at 12:28 am

    For once, I agree with all of your suggestions!

    And it is a nice chart to start with, as well.

  • 2 - RJ

    Aug 03, 2005 at 1:14 am

    Great post. Lots of statistical analysis. Thanks! :)

  • 3 - Eric Berlin

    Aug 03, 2005 at 2:33 am

    Very cool stuff.

    So can we assume that these are free wi-fi networks?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 13, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs