Why was David's Penis so Small?

Why is the willy on Michelangelo's famous statue of David so... tiny?

Shrinkage <----- click on that! (Username: obfuscator and password: whome)

By the way: (And thanks to AJ)... for sites that ask you to register: If you encounter a registration screen when you click on a link, try bugmenot.com, which will provide you with password access.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for lenny-campello

Article Author: Lenny Campello

F. Lennox Campello is a widely published Washington, DC based art critic, as well as an award winning artist and curator. He is also often heard on NPR and the Voice of America discussing visual art issues. …

Visit Lenny Campello's author pageLenny Campello's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - anish

    Nov 29, 2007 at 2:10 am

    Probably Michaelangelo sculpted his own...

  • 2 - BOB

    Sep 08, 2008 at 10:55 pm

    ITS A NORMAL SIZED PENIS

  • 3 - Mephisto

    Sep 23, 2008 at 5:40 am

    then ur penis is rather small

  • 4 - kot

    Nov 19, 2008 at 11:11 am

    imagine that you are a homosexual guy. your vision of perfect male body wouldn't rather include big penis unless you are a masochist too.

  • 5 - Dr Dreadful

    Nov 19, 2008 at 3:29 pm

    The penis is normal-sized.

    Unfortunately, the statue is 17 feet tall...

  • 6 - Ruvy

    Nov 20, 2008 at 5:19 pm

    Goliath (a cousin of David) was supposed to be 17 feet tall. Who was this guy sculpting anyhow?!

  • 7 - Dr Dreadful

    Nov 20, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    Goliath was David's cousin?? I didn't know that.

    Anyway, apparently there was this big lump of marble lying around a quarry that someone had started sculpting a statue out of and then abandoned. Since it was a really nice lump of marble, they weren't about to let it go to waste, so they put out tenders for an artist to make something out of it and Michelangelo got the commission.

    The head, shoulders, arms and upper torso are larger than they would be if David had been sculpted in true proportion. It's thought that Mike intended for him to be displayed on top of a wall some way above eye level, so that to the viewer beneath he would appear to be proportionate. That also probably explains the teeny todger.

  • 8 - garry

    Nov 23, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    in that time large penis was conidered grotesque, and ugly.

  • 9 - willow

    May 01, 2009 at 12:40 am

    It is normal size- for Italians, not for Africans.

  • 10 - Scott

    Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    It is not normal sized for any race. That is extremely small in proportion to his body. It would be the equivalent of an averaged sized person having a 1 inch penis. All of you people who say that is an average sized wee-wee... I'm guessing you say that because yours is the same size. I hate to break it to you, but that is not average by any means. Don't feel bad, there's always surgery! :D

  • 11 - Tyler

    Oct 02, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    I know why is everybody saying this is average size? Maybe to yours, yeah but not 95% of the rest of men.

  • 12 - STM

    Oct 02, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    What worries me is that so many people are commenting on the knob size (or lack thereof) of a sculpture. I'm sure Italians would be rather miffed too if they thought David was representative of "average" knob size.

    Having said all that, all the conjecture over the years is that David was a) a boy, and b) Michelangelo didn't want to offend anyone with a small knob by making David's any bigger.

    The real issue, though, is why it's such an issue. The real factor, as well know, is the so-called "stretch" factor".

  • 13 - Cindy

    Oct 02, 2009 at 9:07 pm

    Size shmize. Most men could use a lesson or two about what to do with it. The size of the statue is adequate. And if he knows what he's doing, hypothetically, he'd be better than most. It's not for sword fighting after all.

    P.S. Italian men (from Italy not the US, it's not in the blood after all) seem to know better than most American men I've encountered. Maybe they were spurred on to be their very best by having that statue to contend with.

  • 14 - roger nowosielski

    Oct 02, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    Hi, Cindy,

    Just got the message. Respond.

  • 15 - Cindy

    Oct 02, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    My comment was pretty insensitive. Okay, so most women probably don't know much more about their own sexuality than most men do. The thing to do is go out and learn. There's plenty to find out. :-)

    (good luck)

  • 16 - roger nowosielski

    Oct 02, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    Why should you worry about a man's ego? It's their greatest weakness.

  • 17 - Dr Dreadful

    Oct 02, 2009 at 11:13 pm

    Aesthetics?

    Perhaps having a vestigial virgin-vandaliser was desirable in Renaissance Italy.

  • 18 - art history major

    Oct 14, 2009 at 8:34 am

    He's a grower not a shower!

  • 19 - Frankenbeans

    Oct 25, 2009 at 1:17 am

    Yeah, so the shaft sits on the sac. that is not normal for non-arctic temperature.

    Might this be a hold over from Greek pederasty?

  • 20 - Jason

    Nov 08, 2009 at 2:51 am

    The penis is small because it follows classical standards. The Greeks found the glans to be obscene, so the foreskin is always covering it. And for whatever reason, they found smaller genitals to be more pleasing (to keep from distracting from the rest of the statue, maybe). So you get these small baby penises on grown men, and gigantic horse-phalluses (with foreskins unretracted, no less) on satyrs and other comic figures.

  • 21 - Megan

    Dec 11, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Maybe Michelangelo liked small penises!! Since it is HIS statue. And NOBODY (including Michelangelo) would have been alive to actually see David's penis, so nobody knows. And, btw, small penises are pretty gross!

  • 22 - Silas Kain

    Dec 11, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Even the tiniest acorn can grow into a mighty oak. Michelangelo used Italian models and was meticulous. So the "larger" question is, is David's penis size typical of Italian males? And, if so, which one of us wants to tell the cast of Jersey SHore?

  • 23 - Cindy

    Dec 11, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    lol

  • 24 - PoorOldEdgarDerby

    Jan 13, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    The statue of David was done in the ancient Greek tradition. In those times, smaller penises were seen as civilized and thus more desirable. Large ones were belonging to barbarians and savages.

  • 25 - Shelley

    Feb 06, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    It symbolized his innocence...

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs