Why Television Is Worth Not Watching - Page 3

Color me gregarious.

And finally, I found another side-effect of not watching television. It seems to me that the medium is necessarily self referential. And because television shoots for the widest possible audience within its particular market segment, the programming carries all sorts of underlying assumptions within it that can easily be taken for granted. But the further I got from television-watching, the less I tended take those assumptions for granted.

Color me deconstructionist.

I do, of course, still see television on occasion. Usually this occurs when I am in the home of a friend or relative. When I go home for the holidays, I tend to see quite a bit of it. In fact, I make it a point to do a little bit of catching up. Not enough to miss the reason for my visit (which is, of course, to see the person I am visiting), but just enough to get a sense of what's currently on.

Color me a binge-watcher.

The difference in my perception of it is interesting to me. One effect is that the tube now has a strange magnetic power. If the TV is running while a conversation is going on in the room, it is quite difficult for me to shut out the TV and focus on the conversation. So to make sure we have a real visit, I sometimes ask that the television be turned off.

Color me mesmerized.

The other effect is that when I watch television, I tend to go far more "meta" with it than I did previously. I think not only in terms of the programming itself, but in terms of the medium's effect on the programming. The thing itself has become interesting to me, not just what's on it.

Color me McLuhan.

But when I return home, I don't really feel that I've been missing all that much. Some of it is good (indeed, quite good), but I rather like the direction that my television nonwatching has taken me. So I think I will keep not watching television for a little while longer.

Color me okay with this.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Phillip Winn

    Jan 18, 2006 at 7:55 am

    Excellent, excellent work on this! My own experiences echo yours in many ways. I do have the added pressure of appearing monthly on a radio show to discuss... wait for it... television!

    Okay, I discuss pop culture, which often includes television. It's delightful, discussing shows I've never seen, entirely on the basis of what I've read about them.

    But I do download Lost from the internet. I allow myself one show. It's a weakness!

    What I don't miss most are the commercials. The shows that are really good I can catch on DVD or via download, and commercial-free!

    Anyway, *great* article. Thanks!

  • 2 - Victor Lana

    Jan 18, 2006 at 8:22 am

    Very enjoyable, Jumper. The merits of not watching television are many, especially when you have children. This can affect parent TV times too, but we have a policy of TV off at 8pm and then having story time (reading books) before bed. It has become a routine and it also proves that it's worth not watching television.

    Oh, and to be honest, I tape 24 and The Shield , so I'm not depriving myself of what I want to see.

  • 3 - Brian Sorrell

    Jan 18, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    Pure brilliance!

    I was off television for about 10 years, during which time I got two undergraduate degrees and a graduate degree, learned to play guitar, learned some basic audio engineering, wrote obsessively, and discovered that the 3-5 second chunks in which television is delivered (watch the epileptic editing closely) has a dreadful effect on one's perceptions of the world.

    We've been back on television for a few years, but just last week, we started to phase it out again. It turns out that we only use it for documentaries and independent films, which we can get from Netflix anyway.

    Plus it's more fun to try to kick my wife's butt in Monopoly or Sorry with some beers and chips. The neighbors must think we're nuts, screaming at each other about putting houses on St. Charles Place..... But it's a good life :)

  • 4 - Welfare Cheese

    Jan 18, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    If anyone ever catches me playing Monopoly or Sorry and having a great time... please shoot me in the temple.

  • 5 - Jumper Bailey

    Jan 18, 2006 at 2:13 pm

    Which temple? I've been a visitor to a few different temples (and one mosque) with friends since I started not watching television.

    Of course, one of the benefits on non-TV watching is the ability to enjoy board games and other things that don't have exploding special effects.

    Unless, of course, you like to add exploding special effects to your board games.

    If so, I recomend this.

  • 6 - Tiffany Leigh

    Jan 18, 2006 at 2:46 pm

    I'm all over this post. I heart this post very much.

    I was between apartments for over three months in Manhattan two years ago, crashing on a friend's couch. She didn't have a television, just a radio. I was itchier than a kicking heroin heroine. (Not to mention that the Red Sox were in the playoffs that year, which was killing me not to be able to see).

    And much like you, the damnedest thing happened: I didn't miss it so much once I got my TV privileges back. I caught all the games on the radio, which was old-school thrilling.

    I used to tune in for specific shows but got turned around inevitably and started grazing - watching without specific choices or purpose in mind. Non-destination watching. I was glad to relinquish the feeling.

    And with The Internets™ & XM radio I'm further ahead of the curve for my news/culture/television anyway. Television is Last To Know most days.

    When I want to see a movie I go to the theater. Or I watch it on DVD on my laptop. When I want to watch a television show I wait for DVD and watch commercials (which are incredibly frequent & annoying when you're off the reservation for a spell).

    And if I need my "water cooler" talking points on The Desperate Lost OC Etc. I either go online or listen to my co-workers that are professional television watchers - ones that watch EVERYTHING and speak of the goings-on as if recounting family reunions.

    I didn't want to get all NPR-ish about unplugging - remember the Y2K navel-gazing? - but I do like the fact that I read more, write more, and am less concerned about "missing" something.

    PS = (Geek Spoiler Alert): If Monopoly & Sorry & "party games" are your gaming references you've been scratching the tip of a very old iceberg. Boardgames are an exponentially growing industry in the states with lots of superior booming migration occurring from Europe since 1994. It's a brave new world now. =)

  • 7 - Bliffle

    Jan 18, 2006 at 2:49 pm

    I, too, have frequently enjoyed long periods free of TV, but sometimes I missed good documentaries. Lately, I think I have found the ideal middle-ground: OTA DTV. "OTA" is for Off the Air signals delivered free to your home, just like the old days! No cable. No satellite. No fees. And "DTV" is for Digital TV. DTV is terrific! The picture is clear, steady and free of ghosts. What's more, every analog TV broadcaster is required to broadcast the same content on DTV, usually given a UHF channel to use.

    You can receive OTA DTV off that old analog antenna on your roof, or from one of a variety of indoor antennas, all you need is a DTV receiver, which you can get for $200 at WalMart, or an even better one on eBay for $100 (or less). Most DTV receivers also receive HDTV (High Definition TV), which is spectacular, and even better than cable/satellite HDTV.

    To see the full beauty of DTV you should have a new display (or use your computer!) to show all the resolution and color. Plasma displays are pretty but prohibitively expensive, LCD displays are still expensive, but you can buy an excellent CRT HDTV display for $200-$300 because the stores are dumping them in favor of the new LCDs.

    But the money and trouble are all in vain if the content is unsatisfying. I find that with the major networks OTA (NBC,CBS,ABC,UPN,FOX), and a couple local independents, and the PBS stations, I actually have better content with a smaller number of channels. DTV provides for multiple feeds on one channel, so that the local PBS can send 4 feeds during the day so that I have a richer content selection than I ever had with cable. Fewer commercials, too, since the commercial stations now use 20 minutes of every hour for ads.

  • 8 - Welfare Cheese

    Jan 18, 2006 at 3:02 pm

    Bliffie, the next time you are on your roof fixing your antenna, I hope you fall off the cabin, land on your Model T and choke on a hotel. Get cable you cheap bastard.

  • 9 - Jumper Bailey

    Jan 18, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    Hey, I'm a cheap bastard. Don't be hatin' on cheap bastards.

  • 10 - Bliffle

    Jan 18, 2006 at 7:42 pm

    Actually, of course, Cheese is wrong, as one would expect from his previous posts. DTV is the very latest TV. It is cable and satellite who are outdated, peddling trashy content in an unwatchable format.

    Go digital! It makes TV worth watching again.

  • 11 - Welfare Cheese

    Jan 19, 2006 at 7:14 am

    Who doesn't have digital cable? It is $2.99 a month for the digital box. You can't even get HBO on comcast with an analog box. Almost every satellite channel comes in digital. I had digital cable for years. Sorry Bliffie you're not cutting edge. I heard they have this new "broadband" internet service, can you please explain? (keep it simple for us non-techies)

  • 12 - Bliffle

    Jan 20, 2006 at 11:31 am

    The cheesy one is wrong again. Digital cable is around $50-60 per month and is not as good as OTA digital. Why pay so much money just to get content polluted with 33% commercials? Pay to get commercials? Not for the wiser among us.

  • 13 - Scott Butki

    Jan 25, 2006 at 10:05 pm

    Color me impressed with this essay.Very cool and well written.

  • 14 - Welfare Cheese

    Jan 26, 2006 at 11:56 am

    Bliffle, 2.99 for the digital box in addition to the cost of basic cable. Have you heard of a DVR? No commercials for me, thanks. Congress is set to mandate that all signals be digital by 2008. Get Hi-Def and you will realize how shitty digital really is.

  • 15 - Nancy

    Jan 26, 2006 at 12:22 pm

    Ah, Jumper, this is a GREAT article - if I could write, I would have written it myself; you hit every nail on the head unerringly, at least as far as my own experiences are concerned. Thanks.

  • 16 - Stasey

    Feb 07, 2006 at 11:57 am

    I could get you into LOST. ;-)

  • 17 - Jer

    Jun 28, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    This is a great piece. My wife and I recently reduced our cable package to limited basic. I personally would have preferred to have it altogether eliminated. I have most certainly found that we are far more active and innovative in ways to entertain ourselves without the medium. Moreover, consumer impulses are immensely reduced. Without sounding pretentious, I have felt that television is utterly absurd for the past decade. It is just a device to get people to buy more crap that they don't need and it beats the self-esteem unmercilessly. It is so warped and divorced from reality it is laughable. People in the future will call us morons for being duped by it. KILL YOUR TELEVISION.

  • 18 - Blue

    Feb 20, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    After Six Years without television...and for similar reasons, I experienced all of the points you brought up, plus two:

    1. Weight loss. I still cant figure out why, but I think it has something to do with moving more (rather than sitting in front of the box) and TV snacking. Without TV, I snacked less for some strange reason.

    2. More contact with neighbors, friends and family. Telephone calls are great boredom cures.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 21, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs