In becoming a mother, women have a unique opportunity to show their better nature, substance and worth. Nothing says "I love humanity" like taking the role of mothering seriously and with good grace. And Jesus, if she didn't totally, utterly, and with extreme prejudice, take a big, ripe, steaming crap on that opportunity.
As if her first child, Sean Preston, wasn't dealt the worst hand from the deck of parental cards, at least Britney was around to make sure he wasn't properly strapped into car seats and highchairs. But what about baby #2, little Jayden James? All he has known of life thus far is absentee parenting and indifference.
Jayden is certainly guaranteed a space in an ESL class by the time he gets to kindergarten. I wonder if little JJ and SPF even know who their mommy and daddy are? You KNOW those babies call their nanny "Mommy," and cry when a drunken, bloated Britney shows up trying to feed them Doritos at four in the morning.
Spending night after night at the clubs, drinking and partying when you have two children under the age of two at home is simply not an acceptable option. Neither is shirking you professional obligations, putting a rotating door on your panties, and/or not bothering to wear panties at all.
It is NOT okay to let yourself go in the most extreme ways when you have little children - celebrity or not. But at the current pace, Britney's celebrity days are numbered - maybe she wants to live out her days in obscurity, the punchline of a forgotten joke. If that's the case Britney, your road to perdition is paved with hot dogs and Diet Coke.
It's just sad and unacceptable. Children aren't pets and you don't treat them as such. This is Britney's shame and this is why the media has treated her with no mercy. She deserves no mercy. When you have children, your days as a low-class poptart should be over.
Here's the breakdown for those with ADD: Britney is not Paris, and therefore she is not allowed to act like Paris. Paris is ho and as such is allowed to revel in her ho-dom, Britney is a mother and better stop being a ho. She better stop eating ho-hos too, 'cuz girlfriend is looking puffy and worn out.
.jpg?t=20120527181101)
Article comments
1 - Marcia L. Neil
Nice young women, caught in the cultural crossfire of the effort to control telephone demand-call strategies which had telephone harassment laws and obstruction-of-justice laws as a result. If you've ever complained about influence-network callers who won't stop even after police complaint -- claiming it's their freedom of speech to ruin/waste respondent time and health -- you'd know these two are actually decent young women singled out to 'spread' political influence while traversing uncommon terrains.
2 - Kaonashi
Second only to Whitney Houston, Britney Spears is the one celebrity who has disappointed me so much in such a short period of time. She wasn't the best singer, but she was a good entertainer and seemed like a sweet girl. I can't even begin to understand why she decided to destroy her career and reputation like this. I still like her music and think it's catchy, but I no longer respect the person.
3 - Dawn
Marcia, I am afraid I don't undestand.
Kaonashi - I concur. Britney has really turned on her fans and the public in general. Regardless of what celebrities think, they have a responsibility to their fans. Or else they will no longer have fans.
4 - Mary K. Williams
Comment #1 - talk about your non sequitur! Man, I couldn't make the connection.
Dawn, good work as usual. : )
5 - Dawn
Thank you Mary - your kindness is legendary ;)