From afar, one might think that Paris Hilton and Britney Spears are two peas in the celebrity pod of ho-aciousness. However, upon closer inspection, there are subtle, yet fully distinct differences. The sum total of these differences means one continues to grow more famous as the other sinks more deeply into self-parody.
As more private information and video footage leaks from the ParisExposed.com site, the fuzzier the line between celeb-reality and public perception becomes. It is plausible that the private Paris and the public Paris have merged to create a separate and unique entity unto itself - an insuperable Super Paris. 
While I stand firm by my assertion of Paris' own complicity in this latest scandal — whether through stunning carelessness or direct involvement (the same thing?) — I do feel a twinge of sympathy for her.
Or maybe it's indigestion.
Surely, even Paris doesn't want her most personal medical information laid bare for the world to paw over and judge. Lots of people may have herpes, but not many go around with a scarlet H on their chests, which, if nothing else, would make for awkward dating situations.
All this tawdry business aside, one thing remains concrete: Paris might be burning, but she isn't going down in flames. In fact, once the smoldering ashes of this latest scandal blow away — and blow away they will — all that shall remain is an ever-heightened awareness of Paris Hilton's existence in this world - an existence that has built itself on the old adage "that which decimates my character, serves to make me more famous."
While we all agree that this is Paris Hilton were discussing and there's simply no danger of her curing cancer, discovering alternative fuel sources or bringing peace to the Middle East, we can thank her (or as I prefer, beat her with a shovel) for helping to define the next generation of youth culture, which I affectionately call The It's-All-About-Me Generation.
Paris is the embodiment of this group of self-absorbed, spoiled gimme, gimme, gimmes.
Only a true narcissist would videotape and retain in her possession hours upon hours of incriminating and irrefutable proof that she engages in illicit drug use, promiscuous sex, the perpetuation of racial stereotypes, and general indolent lazing about.
.jpg?t=20120527181101)
Article comments
1 - Marcia L. Neil
Nice young women, caught in the cultural crossfire of the effort to control telephone demand-call strategies which had telephone harassment laws and obstruction-of-justice laws as a result. If you've ever complained about influence-network callers who won't stop even after police complaint -- claiming it's their freedom of speech to ruin/waste respondent time and health -- you'd know these two are actually decent young women singled out to 'spread' political influence while traversing uncommon terrains.
2 - Kaonashi
Second only to Whitney Houston, Britney Spears is the one celebrity who has disappointed me so much in such a short period of time. She wasn't the best singer, but she was a good entertainer and seemed like a sweet girl. I can't even begin to understand why she decided to destroy her career and reputation like this. I still like her music and think it's catchy, but I no longer respect the person.
3 - Dawn
Marcia, I am afraid I don't undestand.
Kaonashi - I concur. Britney has really turned on her fans and the public in general. Regardless of what celebrities think, they have a responsibility to their fans. Or else they will no longer have fans.
4 - Mary K. Williams
Comment #1 - talk about your non sequitur! Man, I couldn't make the connection.
Dawn, good work as usual. : )
5 - Dawn
Thank you Mary - your kindness is legendary ;)