I’ve been chided in the past – by friends, acquaintances, and people who don’t necessarily fit into either category – for what has been described as my sometimes judgmental personality. I’m sure you too have on occasion been instructed snappily, “Don’t judge,” immediately after being made privy to some bit of personal news or information that – let’s face it – calls for just that.
So what are people so afraid of when they say this? And if other people’s judgment is enough of a pressing concern for these people that they feel the need to make a disclaimer before revealing what is presumably confidential information, why do they even bother sharing what they have already logically predetermined to be judgment-worthy information in the first place? I’m getting a headache.
The thing is: I don’t necessarily see the problem with judgment. If we assume said friend/acquaintance/other is sharing this information with you to glean some sort of objective third party perspective, doesn’t that inability to see one’s own dilemma objectively inherently indicate that something is probably off-kilter? And doesn’t the objective advice this person is requesting naturally imply a belief by this person that you possess a sort of better judgment than that which led him/her to his/her predicament to begin with? As I always say to anyone within earshot: the only people who worry about being judged are the people who have already realized they’re about to do, or have already done, something stupid.
I’m sure it’s never pleasant to hear “Wow, you’re a slut!” after divulging details of your one-night stand with the overly-tattooed 22-year old barista you met playing darts at the bar last Tuesday night. Nor do I think it’s easy to stand there under the condemnatory gaze of your gainfully-employed friends after telling them you’ve quit your well-paying job to create abstract collages from public restroom accessories. But the fact remains that, consciously or not, you are sharing this information with these people for a reason. You WANT their judgment. You may, in fact, NEED it.
Assuming the person with whom you’re sharing this nasty bit of business isn’t some stranger off the street, chances are you think this person can offer value to your thought or decision-making process. So don’t get all bent out of shape if the bit of good advice you seek comes with a small price tag (namely: a momentary assault on your dignity). Own your decisions. And certainly don’t be apologetic for them. Unless, of course, you’re thinking of sleeping with that overly-tattooed, 22-year old barista playing darts at the corner of the bar on a Tuesday night. Dangit, there I go again being all judgmental.
Article comments
1 - diana hartman
I assume from the title of the article and the sharing of the article itself that you are prepared for comment.
“Wow, you’re a slut” is not a judgment; it is an insult based on a judgment.
It’s been my experience that negative people judge, the insecure insult, narcissists give unsolicited advice, the optimistic assess, the charitable listen, and the altruist gives feedback.
A hallmark of maturity is the ability to accept responsibility for what one says rather than blaming the other person for having shared " the old “You asked for it” defense, if you will. Abandoning all decorum may be our right, but many who do so are left.
2 - KenCheng21
Dear Altruist - thanks for the feedback! I can tell from your even and non-accusatory tone that you took the article for what it is; a (hopefully) humorous attempt to play devil's advocate.
I completely agree that constructive criticism or feedback is the ultimate form of support. Additionally I agree that unsolicited advice is a nuisance on par with hearing your next door neighbors having aggressively wall-banging sex.
That said: I don't think pointing out the obvious to a person who probably already knows what they're sharing may be ridiculous (hence the "Don't judge!" disclaimer) is necessarily blaming or invocatory of the 'you asked for it' defense. I think a good friend calls a spade a spade.
In any case Diana Hartman, I appreciate the time and thought to comment.
PS. Nice wordplay on the right/left comment!
3 - malbec
You are hilarious :) Great article.
4 - malbec
I had a recent conversation with a friend about being judgmental..and I don't think it's all that bad. I think that we don't do it enough...especially with close friends. I think a lot of us are afraid to offend our friends by offering our opinions when in fact...I think that being a good friend requires one to be a little judgmental.
5 - Mu
Judging is failing to understand the true meaning of situations, and considering events under one light only.
It is a lack of wisdom, but it is also very human because necessary to our society. (Sexual taboos are necessary to an orderly society).
I like to consider myself more than a mere human being, whose way of thinking is dictacted by the society I evolve in.
I find judging unecessary. And I do not open myself to those who might judge me.
I had rather elevate myself to more important things. And enjoy my life as much as I can.
6 - Shari
Being judgmental doesn't do anything for the person being judged. It is a way for the person making the judgment to feel superior. Making oneself feel better at the expense of others is generally agreed upon by the vast majority of people to be a bad thing. It reflects poorly on the judge's self-esteem and character.
If you can't see why being judgmental is bad though, then you probably have greater issues to work through than merely being a judgmental person as you lack self-awareness (of your own motivation in judging others) and empathy.
7 - Christopher Rose
I don't see that there is anything at all wrong with having an opinion about something.
Saying someone is judgemental is more normally a snide way of objecting to the fact that someone has an opinion of you that you don't like, so it has nothing at all to do the views of people like Shari.
8 - roger nowosielski
We are rational, thinking beings, and part of that means making discriminating judgments of situations and people - if only to ourselves. Making our judgments known is another ball of wax. I tend to agree with #7 as to the connotation of the word "judgmental," but Diana Hartman makes interesting distinctions. And the crux of the matter seems to be - what purpose does making our judgments/assessments known serve? The underlying intent may well be the key to assessing the meaning.
Also, there's another interesting thought which emerges in the course of these comments - the grounding of the modern term of "political correctness" in the good old notion of decorum and social etiquette, extrapolated to specifically apply to a political kind of environment and conversation. Something to think about.
9 - Ken Cheng
Thanks for the comments, folks.
Let me first say that I agree completely with Diana, Mu and Shari in their central premise that callously unreasonable and unsolicited judgment is irritating and only leads to debacles like California’s Prop. 8 and the likes of Kris Allen winning American Idol.
That said, I should emphasize again my original distinction between the kind of unprovoked judgment they note above and the very specific, micro-level judgment of which my column refers.
Malbec, Christopher and Roger all bring up good points. I simply don’t see the point in merely telling a friend what he/she wants to hear in discussions in which you two share a fundamental disagreement. Why bother having the conversation in the first place? Going back to my (admittedly ridiculous) example, I am 100% okay calling my friend Susie a “dumb slut” if she tells me that she eschewed reviewing depositions for her big murder trial last night because she was feeling randy and decided instead to pick up the first guy she saw playing darts at her local bar. I would be 100% okay saying this to her because I know that she knows that comment comes from a place of well-thought-out love. Of course, it would be completely different if I said this to the woman whose cell phone conversation I happened to be eavesdropping on while standing in line at the DMV.
Either way, my original point remains: own your decisions. Stop prefacing your latest idiotic misadventures with “Don’t Judge!” and then get all indignant when your friend(s) inevitably do just that. Perhaps go with “Wanna hear something awesome?”
10 - roger nowosielski
Good points, Ken. Much of the trouble with human discourse is that we tend to be enamored with the descriptive use/model of language as if there were no other, more important or just as frequent uses. A remark must have its point, it must be addressed to someone, there has got to be a reason for saying things. To evaluate our locutions apart from the context and our reasons for them, as though there were kind of absolute descriptions, more often than not misses the point and is the perennial source of trouble with human communications and understanding.
11 - Ruvy
Ken,
Being judgmental has a whole series of connotations. One is rendering judgment upon a person who has told you a story about themselves, perhaps one too revelatory for your tastes. Another is insulting that person (to his face) based on the judgment you have made.
But a third aspect of "being judgmental", the one that occurred immediately to me when seeing the title of the article, was ignored - the act of judging a person to others without telling the person to his face.
Any comments?
12 - Ken Cheng
Roger - agree that judgments are not made in a vacuum, which is - more or less - my point in dismissing the generalization that judgment of others is always a bad thing. After all, our entire legal system is predicated on the notion that 12 people, when presented with facts from opposing sides, will make a sound and fair judgment. But then again, some smart aleck will just point out the O.J. jury and I'd have no rebuttal...
Ruvy - I chalk up the third scenario you mention less to being judgmental and more to just being a dick. After all, that's what you are if you are habitually expressing judgment of others behind their backs, don't you think?