I have to start out by making a concession. In my last piece on Wal-Mart it seems that I used a poor choice of words when I stated that Wal-Mart opening more stores was not a very good way to cut costs. The simple point that I was trying to make was that Wal-Mart, by openening more stores while continuing to shaft its employees on basic benefits and decent living wages, in my opinion, shows that Wal-Mart cares little for the well-being of its employees.
Here's a fact: Wal-Mart reported record second quarter sales and earnings this year. The retailer's net income for the second quarter was $2.8 billion (up 5.8%). This is the typical song and dance from these corporations...cut jobs and shaft employees while the company is raking in record profits (view the earnings statement).
So yes, I was wrong in stating that opening new stores was not a good way to cut costs as it will indeed increase store revenues. But how does that help the employees? Lee Scott has made it very clear that Wal-Mart has no intention of raising the wages of its workers.
But that's not the point of this week's rant. Today is the release of Robert Greenwald's documentary "Wal-Mart: The Hight Cost of Low Price" which takes a look at what the mega-corporation is doing to our communities and our nation and it seems like the movie has Wal-Mart a little worried. According to an article in the NYTimes today, Wal-Mart is concerned that the film could be a success on the caliber of Michael Moore's "Rober & Me" and do further harm to the company's already sullied image.
Wal-Mart's response: they hired some of the biggest names in the PR industry and have fired up a war room to try to ease the minds of reluctant shoppers. They've even gone so far as to make a film to counter Greenwald's documentary which they've so cleverly titled "Why Wal-Mart Works & Why That Makes Some People Crazy".






Article comments
1 - Tan The Man
"(and 50,000 times as much as the workers of Wal-Mart's Chinese suppliers)"
I think a lot of companies take advantage of the Asian workforce to help cut costs.
2 - Aaman
Comparisons of this nature mean little, really, and as long as $5 DVDs and $10 jeans are still available, the wage increases become of little import in the marketplace.
What the workforce is up against is a near-complete erosion of labor solidarity, a consumerism wave that's nowhere near it's peak, and their own capitalist lust.
Some wars are over before they begin, methinks
3 - Alethinos
You said it Aaman...
Alethinos
4 - Howard
Why aren't those opposed to Walmart content to never shop there? There are many of us who believe Walmart is one of the great success stories of our nation. If you don't agree, go ahead and pay twice the price to support mom and pop stores whose proprietors go to Walmart to do their own shopping.
5 - Scott Butki
Howard: Because it's more complicated than just where one shops when Wal-Warts are getting governbmetn subsidies, some of its employees are on welfare, etc.
Good post, Mr. Parker. watched the new documentary today and it touched on some of these topics. I also wrote this piece on some new Wal-Mart news.