Verizon Says Wait a Minute

"Excuse me Judge Very-Unhelpful":

    Verizon Communications Inc. asked a federal judge Thursday to stay his ruling making it much simpler for the entertainment industry to tie a digital pirate's online activities to his real-world identity.

    Verizon lawyers want U.S. District Judge John D. Bates to wait until a federal appeals court reviews the case before they are forced to disclose the identity of an Internet subscriber suspected of illegally offering more than 600 songs from top artists.

    The company previously indicated it will appeal the Jan. 21 ruling, which raised the risks of getting caught for computer users who illegally trade music or movies online.

    ....Verizon's lawyer, John Thorne, promised Thursday the company will "use every legal mechanism available to protect the privacy of our subscribers."

    "If this ruling stands, consumers will be caught in a digital dragnet not only from record companies alleging infringement of their copyright monopolies but from anyone who can fill out a simple form," Thorne said. [AP]

The more time people have to think about this, the more absurd it becomes: how can you grant corporations or other "copyright holders" unlimited subpoena powers without judicial supervision? Since when did the US become an official plutocracy?

Peter Swire, the Clinton administration's top privacy official and now a professor at Ohio State University, made this statement yesterday:

    Court Decision Must be Stayed: Would Unleash Widespread Surveillance Into Private Communications

    Peter P. Swire, Professor at the Ohio State University, and former Chief Counselor for Privacy in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, submitted a declaration today in the case of Recording Industry Association of America ("RIAA") v. Verizon, pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

    The case began when the RIAA issued a subpoena to Verizon, demanding to know the identity of one of Verizon's Internet customers. The RIAA suspected that Verizon's customer was offering music files on his or her computer for distribution to other "peer-to-peer" music swapping on the Internet. The RIAA brought this case under the previously untested subpoena provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA").

    Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs