Twelve Step Groups Need to Get Real

. . . I went to twelve step meetings because of a parent's addiction. I often ended up in combined AA/Adult Children of Alcoholics meetings. Later I went to Overeaters Anonymous meetings because of difficulty following a restrictive diet for a health condition. Years earlier I had had an eating disorder, but had recovered from that without 12 stepping. I live in the United States, so this article reflects my experience there.

At first I found a little help from seeing others like me, and being in an environment where people were trying to drop their plastic facades and be real. It wasn't very long before I began to see things that were wrong, however. The sharing seemed rather forced and compulsive, without the deep comfort of saying your feelings to a group of people who are really listening. Part of that was simply the set up of the meetings, with flaky self-absorbed Caucasian baby boomers coming and going throughout. If that one thing had been dealt with, I feel a lot more real sharing would have gone on. There were also self-aggrandizing individuals who would hog group time bragging about their exploits. This made people uncomfortable. It drove the more reticent people underground. Eventually I think a rule about taking up too much time was instituted in one group I went to. Mixing of quiet victim types and noisy braggarts is a bad idea. I think a lot could be gained from separating these two groups and closing meetings to latecomers and those who leave before the meetings are over. Of course cell phones and pagers should be verboten. (I went before these were so popular).

I've read about twelve step "predators" who prey on new female members. If anything, the anti-authoritarian nature of people where I live made "predators" non-existent, as well as sponsors. We also lacked leaders to stop abuses of the groups' attention in a timely manner. There was a general abdication of authority due to the fact that so many flaky Caucasian baby boomers had migrated to my area to flee their families. [For those that care, I am white but I have my limits.] Collectively they didn't do well in leadership positions, if they would even acknowledge such existed. So it's not all gurus and predators at AA. In fact I was looking for a sponsor but could never find one or even someone to give me a straight answer on how to get one.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - -E

    May 07, 2005 at 2:55 am

    Interesting post. I think a lot of the 12 step groups and if they work for you depend on two things- who you are as an individual and the dynamics of the group. My mom is a recovering alcoholic and drug addict. She goes to both AA and NA. I recently went to visit her to witness her picking up her 6 month chip. The meetings she has found are entirely different from your experiences. That is why she goes to those. She has gone to a few that sound exactly like what you described. But luckily she has found some smaller groups of real people out there who genuinely want to improve themselves and help others. None of the sharing time hoggers and such. They feel the freedom to share what is going on, what struggles they are facing and all respond to each other. And they are a pretty diverse crowd- in terms of race, age and religion.

    But they all also understand that they need more than just those meetings and 12 steps.

    So I dunno. I guess it depends on what you can find out there.

  • 2 - Dave Nalle

    May 07, 2005 at 3:07 am

    Great insight into the 12 step world. I've always been skeptical about the programs, but not having been in one I've reserved judgement. It's always seemed illogical to me to look for help and support to other people whose problems are as bad as or worse than your own.

    Dave

  • 3 - Cerulean

    May 07, 2005 at 3:19 am

    I tried at least a dozen different meeting sites within my city, possibly twenty. The meeting where the drug deals went on was in another county and was in the country. The guy who drove me to it was a sober former drug addict who had been helped by the program, obviously. Then the meetings I've observed in the park make three more groups. I've observed about twenty-three or four meeting sites/groups of twelve step people over fifteen years time. It could be the nature of people here making them flakier and more self-absorbed than elsewhere. Twelve step groups do help some people keep sober, denying and there is that value of seeing others admit they are flawed and in pain, perhaps pain a lot like yours.

    I'm not trying to say that there isn't good done by twelve step meetings. I'm glad your mother found help and more stable people to share with. The guy who started one of the meetings in the park here decades ago is sober today but unpleasant and overly emphatic and rigid. He's really uncomfortable to be around, but yes, he is sober. I just think there is more work to be done.

  • 4 - Cerulean

    May 07, 2005 at 3:23 am

    My comments above are directed at -E. There's a typo where I wrote "denying" when I meant to say, there's no denying that twelve step groups have helped some people get sober.

  • 5 - -E

    May 07, 2005 at 3:47 am

    Oh I certainly think there is a lot more work people need to do than just get sober. And that is what my mom is getting with these other people that think there is more. She moved to Florida and found good groups. When she lived here in Austin- they were mostly as you describe.

    I am not saying it will work for everyone though.

  • 6 - Mary

    May 07, 2005 at 11:55 am

    As a child of an alcoholic, you should have also gone to Al Anon group meetings. They are there for you as a group of people whose lives have been affected by alcohol. AA for for the alcoholics. When questioned one time at an open meeting, one recovering alcoholic said the reason they joke, is because they themselves find it difficult to come straight out and confront it. One person who was in AA came to Al Anon. WHen asked why, he said "He goes to AA for his drinking, while he comes to Al Anon for this "thinking." I thought that was just a good analysis of these two groups.

  • 7 - Cerlean

    May 08, 2005 at 3:18 pm

    You misunderstood what I wrote. I did go to some Alanon meetings, but Alanon emphasizes how to cope with having an alchoholic in your life currently, which wasn't the case. Codependents Anonymous, Adult Children of Alchoholics, and combined Alcoholics Anonymous/ACA meetings ended up being the most appropriate meetings available to me. Regardless of the title, many attendees were both addicts and codependents or ACA's. The addict-survivors tended to be the Wild Ones I wrote about. They should have been separated out, with a trained leader to get past the bragging and into the stuff underneath it. It would take skill, trust, and an appropriate setting.

  • 8 - Nancy

    May 08, 2005 at 4:29 pm

    I slogged away at 12-steps for two years, then finally quit. I didn't get any better, and listening to their problems just made me anxious and down. I also went to some AA/Adult Children of Alc.s meetings, and to my surprise, not once did any of the AA/ACA leaders bring up the fact that for most addicts, the inability to ever handle alcohol has a chemical reason: normally alcohol breaks down into acetic acid + water. No problem. For alcoholics, alcohol ALWAYS breaks down into acetic acid + water + THIQ (tetrahydro-ioquinidine sp?) which is a brain chemical which produces addiction to whatever substance it is someone's particular DNA is sensitive to. All they ever did at the AA/ACA was harp on this 'higher power' mumbo-jumbo, never getting past the old 'it's your moral inability to control yourself' schtick. Yeah, the alcoholic is helpless - after all, who can (at this time, we may someday) control their brain chemistry? But to know it's a chemical fact and not a personal shortcoming seems to me a lot more helpful and positive as far as information goes. When I volunteered this bit of biochemical information, they didn't want to hear it; I guess they preferred to continue thinking it was a personal failure? I should think they'd present whatever anyone could grab onto for help as well as the higher power factor - and that's something else: they keep hammering on 'higher power' - but everyone there knows they really mean God, even tho they tiptoe all around the word. What foolishness. Additionally, I had someone come to me and 'apologise' for wrongs they'd done me. Well, this may have made HIM feel better, but it only made me mad all over again. I didn't care if it made him feel better, and I didn't care to listen to him yammer on about his contrition. If he wanted to confess, he should have gone to a priest. The 12-step groups encourage this, but they spend absolutely NO time at all considering how the victim to be apologized to will feel to have this garbage brought up again. I do wish I had made myself feel better by just hauling off and decking him, and THEN telling him, 'apology accepted'. I think that would have truly brought closure to it.

  • 9 - HW Saxton

    May 08, 2005 at 4:50 pm

    I don't have anything against ANY kind
    of a support group that will help in a
    positive way.I've several friends that
    have seemingly (so far) made these AA
    programs work for them.I've also lost a
    couple of friends in the recent past to
    substance abuse so I know how important
    it is for some people to be able to put
    forth their problems to others who may
    understand.This is all for the good.

    I have to agree with Cerulean that there
    are many problems with the 12 step and
    similar programs. Many people become as
    addicted to meetings as they were to the
    drugs and drinks. Switching one extreme
    for another without addressing the real
    problem underneath it all seems a waste
    of time. My main problem with these 12
    step programs is that they teach that
    you and only you are to blame for your
    problems(largely correct) but that only
    a "higher power"can resolve these(wrong)
    problems. Bullshit. This is just like
    saying give yourself to God and he''ll
    make it all right. They should put more
    emphasis on rebuilding the individuals
    self esteem,positive goals,forgiveness
    of ones self (guilt is a KILLER)and many
    other problems that are commonly seen in
    people with substance problems. There is
    an underlying sense of base Christianity
    at the core of the 12 step program that
    I find disconcerting,the "Higher Power"
    concept & the use of The Lord's Prayer
    mainly.Once again I can't knock anything
    that may help someone get clean & sober.

    But there are alternatives & other ways
    to achieve this laudable goal.I've been
    to AA meetings and have seen many of the
    problems that the author speaks of and I
    hope that any and all that want to get
    clean can come to a happy resolve w/o AA
    programs.

  • 10 - Cerulean

    May 08, 2005 at 5:00 pm

    Good comments, Nancy and HW Saxton.

    I had forgotten about the tacit Christianity, even the enforced belief in a diety. I believe in dieties personally but I don't want this forced on others, and I certainly don't want Christianity foisted on desperate people. At the same time, I recognize that discovering God has helped a lot of addicts. I think that overtly Christian or God stuff should be limited to Christian recovery groups.

    It can be important for some addicts and survivors (moreso addicts) to have some kind of consideration of a higher power or "the universe," or their own limitations, or their own need for help and light from without. The words can be rewritten to be inclusive and as inoffensive as possibe. There will never be a perfect wording but they can do better.

  • 11 - Aaron, Duke De Mondo

    May 08, 2005 at 7:42 pm

    Cerulean, thanks for your post, and its perfectly true. these things just don't work for some people. it worked for me though. it is working. and i never experienced any of the things you describe, except maybe for the long-winded types. heh. but as for the sharing in a roomful of folks who ain't listenin, for me anyhow, i don't give a fuck if they hear or not. half times i barely speak in sentences. but it makes sense to me, and maybe irons out stuff i couldn't get a handle on.

    there's plenty folks who've done worse or not as bad things than me, but there's always something they've got goin on that i can identify with. i was told not to look for the contrasts. somethin along those lines.

    certainly it was the only thing that DID work for me, when hospitals and doctors and family and friends were helpless. i owe it absoloutely everything i got, which might'nt look like much, but the peace in the head-space is worth a hell of a lot to me.

    i was lucky enough to fall in with someone who did become a sponsor, and certianly one-on-one yacks are much more beneficial for me than roomfull's of listeners.

    but as you said up there, your comin from an american perspective, so i dunno what it's like. i dunno what it's like 50 miles away, never mind america.

    but anyway, thanks for the honesty, and im off for to watch somethin about werewolves.

  • 12 - parker

    May 11, 2005 at 1:23 pm

    Thanks for the post. I've always wondered about the 'making amends' part of it too. I finally came to the conclusion that they didn't see things the same way as I did. They are always the victim, so they couldn't see how they were victimizing others. I'm just talking about one specific person here, not making a general statement. But I think it may be a plausible explanation.

  • 13 - clara

    May 16, 2006 at 6:39 am

    Thank you! I am an incest assult survivor/child of active addicts. Who harras me to this day to continue their inappropriateness. To put it lightly, if that is possible. I had someone make amens to me. I began to think and I realized all my bosses I picked all my boyfreinds except one were addicts. After years of therapy for the first my primary issues I went to al-anon for support. Honestly I found people without compassion for the victim, themeselves or others in the group. The focus was on interprting the abusive behavior no matter what or how wrong , of the addict in a non-personal manner. Another focus was in being of purpose to the addict. I went for support to hear people say yeah good for you! break ties with those addicts care for yourself finnaly. Care for people who treat you like a whole person. Care for people who you can work through problems with, who don't try to control your life in the most manipulative ways. But what I got was litterally from a pamphlet "Losing one's temper destroys the chance to help at that moment". Anger=taking it personally =putting up boundaries to abusive behavior=no al-anon till they creat one specialized for people who are dormats. So thank you I will find a good group with a well educated leader.

  • 14 - Stephen M (Ethesis)

    May 18, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    Most of us were quiet and could have shared more authentically away from these crazy women.

    Hmm. I'm in an OA group, mostly for the fellowship. It is a guys only meeting, and it works best when we follow the formula. The only guy in it that people dislike fits the description you have of everyone in your 12 step experience.

    Interesting. Makes me glad for the group I'm in.

  • 15 - James Burns

    Dec 10, 2007 at 8:12 pm

    I completely disagree with your arguement. Alcoholics need to take responsibility for their behavior. They have a tendency to feel victimized by their parents, or their environment. They may even blame their drinking on someone else, and use this as an excuse to drink. Alcoholics like to control people and use guilt in order to do so. No, no one is going to apologize to us including our alcoholic parents. So what. Alcoholics need a clear conscience in order not to drink. Their own behavior has screwed up enough people, they need to make amends with the people that they have harmed. That they can control

  • 16 - seekingtruth

    May 15, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    I was hard core program 8 years worked steps every year and was honest. Now realize most were lying we were not all the same and my personality too trusting nature beat up on myself etc made me perfect mark for predator serial killer who still free uses it to dismiss his crimes and they help him get off give free housing even after over 15 years of same pattern. He raises his hand pretends b nice guy bad disease can site big book my memory yet its all lies. I hired a well known expert forensic psych and he confirmed its not normal surround myself criminal people he is killer and I was 1 of many of his marks and I am still in danger. I got sober but realize that was only medicating the real issue and AA only enabled my core issues and put me in danger. Many have good intentions but most lie. I was shocked when I realized well respected "sponsors" were lying through their teeth. They like the power credibility and control they get by using vulnerable people to make them feel better than and manipulate for their sick perversion! I'm so grateful I am no longer associated however I still fear them and by opening up and sharing my vulnerabilities and weaknesses I am still a perfect target. I hope my recent moment of clarity, as they say, helps me recognize red flagS and run when dangerous
    people try to enter my life. I hope this helps someone else do the same!

  • 17 - J Davies

    Sep 09, 2010 at 9:37 am

    Its too bad that the 'recovery' and 'treatment' industry in the US seems to be locked into 12 step programs as the best possible solution. For me it was just a bunch of Calvinist claptrap. The underlying theme seemed to be that addicts need to suffer and be punished for their 'crime' of addiction. I found AA/NA to be explicitly Christian Lord's Prayer and all! Americans view recovery success as total abstinence while Europeans take a more rational approach and judge success on the basis of functionality within society.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs