Tom Cruise, the new Jerry Falwell

With Tom Cruise drawing so much media attention to Scientology in recent weeks, it would be easy to jump on the Tom-bashing bandwagon and dismiss Scientology as a fringe, extremist cult. Like a friend's coworker who recently referred to Cruise as an "atheist with no balls," while watching him tear in to Matt Lower on the break-room television.

But, honestly, I don't know the first thing about Scientology. Yes, the general consensus among the American public is that Scientologists are about as sane as Wacko Jacko. But this is the same American public that acquitted Michael Jackson, elected someone named George Bush three times, and bought millions of Britany Spears/Jessica Simpson albums.

So, I did what I always do when I want to learn something new, I went to Wikipedia. I wikilearned that Scientology's central beliefs are that:

1. A person is an immortal spiritual being (termed a thetan) who possesses a mind and a body, accompanied by a lesser "genetic entity"; 2. The thetan has lived through many past lives, stored memories of which can cause problems in the present day; 3. And that a person is basically good, but is "aberrated" by the memories of past traumas.

That doesn't sound too odd. It has combined bits and pieces from some of the major religions. Basically, like all religions, it's a system of beliefs and ritual that help us deal with life, the universe, and everything. I could have learned a little more about the specifics of the religion, but I grew tired of reading the long Wikipedia entry, skimmed through the headings, and left in search of a shorter, more entertaining answer.

So, I went to the Scientology website, hoping to find a few answers there. After clicking the "What is Scientology?" link, I came to a page divided into 13 ways Scientology can improve your life. But when I clicked on these categories, instead of an explanation of what Scientology offered, I was asked to purchase a book or pamphlet by L. Ron Hubbard, the religion's founder. Now, I'm not expert on the whole evangelizing thing, but it seems that charging people for information is a hard way to spread the word.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • What Is Scientology? What Is Scientology?

    The complete and essential encyclopedic reference on the subject and practice of Scientology. This book contains the pertinent data on every aspect of the subject: The life of L. ...

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - -E

    Jun 28, 2005 at 6:05 pm

    It is because there is the evil alien Xenu that has imparted several different evil spirits into us. Hubbard figured out that he knows the secret to thwart these evil spirits to allow up to fulfill our own demigod potential. And for 350k, you too can learn the secrets....

    It is a for profit religion. And it is set up in a way that there can't be any IRS investigations and such.

  • 2 - Eric Olsen

    Jun 28, 2005 at 6:35 pm

    were they involved with the WTC?

  • 3 - KC

    Jun 28, 2005 at 6:52 pm

    In To Kill a Mockingbird Lee Harper wrote something along the lines of: "A bible in the hands of one man can be more dangerous than a gun in the hands of another." (I know I don't have the exact quote)

    Maybe there's nothing wrong with any idea of religion (including TomKat's) but the problem might be how we're movitated to behave by our own take on those beliefs.

    Hadn't heard of Under the Banner, have to look into that one. Sounds good.

  • 4 - Just Scattered

    Jun 28, 2005 at 7:31 pm

    I think they should both be committed. If Jerry Falwell was as nice looking as Tom Cruise we would all be in serious trouble...

  • 5 - Wikipedian

    Jun 29, 2005 at 7:22 am

    The Wikipedia general article didn't cut to the chase.

    You should start from here

  • 6 - andy marsh

    Jun 29, 2005 at 7:28 am

    And we care what Tom says...why?

  • 7 - KC

    Jun 29, 2005 at 8:27 am

    From Wikipedia: " The kidnapped populace was loaded into space planes for transport to the site of extermination, the planet of Teegeeack (Earth). The space planes were exact copies of Douglas DC-8s, "except the DC-8 had fans, propellers on it and the space plane didn't." DC-8s have jet engines, not propellers, although Hubbard may have meant the turbine fans."

    You know when ever I read what Hubbard is supposed to have written I keep thinking: "No...really, that can't be it." Yet, there are those who swear up and down this has helped them. The whole think looks like a combo of Charles Berlitz's books and EST with a little Eastern philosophy thrown in, and yet...

    I don't get it, but it's their faith and I don't think anyone should knock it. Now when an individual seems determined to deter anyone needing medical help from getting it--then I'm all ears.

  • 8 - Joan Webster

    Jun 29, 2005 at 12:10 pm

    Tom Cruse is a nut case. Just a spoiled little man going through mid-life crisis. Who cares what he thinks or says. He's a idiot, just like a lot of the other actors. Their so impressed with themselves only the weak minded believe what comes out of their mouths.

  • 9 - Laurel

    Jun 29, 2005 at 5:58 pm

    Tom Cruise doesn't have medical training and I doubt he's ever suffered from postpartum depression. Maybe he should keep his mouth shut.

    If anyone is researching Scientology, look up the name Lisa Mcpherson.

  • 10 - Tracy

    Jun 30, 2005 at 2:24 am

    I find it curious that with a religion so controversial as scientology, the fact that none of it's famous disciples seem willing or able to explain their beliefs. Tom Cruise gets almost livid if even the slightest derogatory remark is made about this mysterious faith. Jerry Falwell on the other hand patiently explains the Christian beliefs and answers it's critics accusations time and time again. Still, Falwell is the one they criticize for having different beliefs from the culture we live in today.

  • 11 - KYS

    Jul 06, 2005 at 10:08 pm

    I have no problem with Mr. Cruise's beliefs (though I don't share them in the least). Nor do I have a problem with Scientology (though I think it's laughable). I think this is a phase. Didn't we all go through something like this when we were newly post-adolescent? You know, the righteous rage, the angst of youth without the benefit of critical thought, experimentation with different spiritual beliefs? Tommy is hitting this phase rather late in life I suppose, but doesn't that make him a perfect emotional match for Katie? I don't know what he's read about the 'history of psychiatry', but I think it takes more than a high school education to tackle this topic. I hope he never has to deal with a severely mentally ill friend or family member. He is clearly not educated on this issue. I suspect the 'papers' he reports to have studied are by Hubbard, et al, - not any credible peer-reviewed journal submissions (those would be beyond him). My hope for him is that one day he will grow up, and learn that passion for a belief does not necessarily lend it any credibility. Oh, and by the way…Brooke Shields is a brave and honest woman who deserves the utmost respect and support for sharing her story in the hopes of helping the many women suffering from this very real and life-threatening disorder. Tom…get a clue.

  • 12 - KYS

    Jul 06, 2005 at 11:15 pm

    "Tom Cruise gets almost livid if even the slightest derogatory remark is made about this mysterious faith"

    Great point, Tracy.

  • 13 - Greg

    Jul 08, 2005 at 10:38 am

    Tracy, KYS, I don't agree.

    I've been a Scientologist for over two decades. I am perfectly willing to answer any questions you might have on Scientology. Just use the feedback form on my www.liveandgrow.org site.

    Tom Cruise and others have been extremely forthright in talking about Scientology. But they are constantly reduced to sound-bites and bizarre out-of-context quotes (and misquotes.)

    There is one specific area of Scientology that Scientologists are unwilling to talk about - and that is their own individual experiences in session. Which is just as true for Catholics and their experiences in the Confessional booth, or shrink-goers and their experiences on the couch. An individual journey is personal and private.

    Outside of this, Scientologists are willing to talk about anything. Or at least I am.

    Please do keep in mind the following facts though:

    1) There is a selective bigotry alive and well in our culture, where it seems perfectly alright to mock and ridicule one religious belief and not another. This is not ethical. Questions should be respectful and courteous. You'd never says "those wacky Jews!" or "and she's marrying a Methodist!!" - but apparently some people think it's totally ok to speak like this of us Scientologists, call us a wacky cult, etc. Selective bigotry is still bigotry.

    2) Big Pharma spends oodles of money to make us look like "just a nutty cult" - why? Because our activism has cost companies like Eli Lilly (makers of Prozac) billions of dollars in revenue. We believe SSRIs are dangerous, addictive and overprescribed. You know who else agrees? The FDA. And many doctors (www.blockcenter.com), neurologists (www.adhdfraud.com), even psychiatrists (www.breggin.com) agree with our views on this.

  • 14 - KYS

    Jul 08, 2005 at 8:14 pm

    Greg-

    Your points are well taken. And, as I’ve said, I have no problem with anybody’s belief Scientology (or Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism). I respect your right to believe what you want. What I have a problem with is Tom Cruise calling Matt Lauer glib or ignorant, because he doesn’t share the same beliefs. It is an irresponsible (and ill-informed) statement to say that there is no biological cause for depression. It is arrogant for him to claim he understands the chemical make-up of the human brain. I agree that medications can be over-prescribed. I agree that medications can be abused. But they can also help people. Tom Cruise has no right to condemn a person for choosing medicinal support for a documented illness. I also wonder if his refusal to allow medical intervention includes dental cleanings, mole removals or laser eye surgery…..

    I also agree with you that bigotry is a general problem in this country, (which is why I raised an eyebrow at your “shrink-goers” comment…;)). Is it possible that the Scientology community in general has a prejudice against any and all medications, regardless of their potential to help people?

    Finally, I would take you up on your willingness to clear up some circulating facts about Scientology, and invite you to explain Thetans and the whole deal with humans being exiled from an alien race. Is this a belief of Scientology? I don’t see them on the Scientology website, but I’ve read that they are central to its core.

    Thanks for your thought provoking response.

    K

  • 15 - KYS

    Jul 08, 2005 at 9:34 pm

    PS, Greg. I looked up "Auditing" on your site, and here's what I got:
    auditing: Scientology counseling, taken from the Latin word audire which means “to hear or listen.” Auditing is a very unique form of personal counseling which helps an individual look at his own existence and improves his ability to confront what he is and where he is. See Chapter 5.

    Auditing by List: a technique used in certain auditing procedures.

    auditor: a minister or minister-in-training of the Church of Scientology. Auditor means one who listens, from the Latin audire meaning “to hear or listen.” An auditor is a person trained and qualified in applying auditing to individuals for their betterment. An auditor does not do anything to a preclear, he works together with the preclear to help the preclear defeat his reactive mind. See Chapter 5.

    Can you tell me more?

  • 16 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 6:44 pm

    To K:

    First of all, I appreciate your courtesy.

    I want to clarify a few points, taking point-by-point your posts:

    1) TC did not call Matt Lauer ignorant at any point. He used the word "glib" - which is Scientology parlance connotes a person that skims study without doing proper research, who bases his opinions and views on unevaluated information. And Lauer most definitely fits that bill, by parroting the Big Pharma party line without himself knowing the first thing about the subject. I agree with Cruise in that Lauer has a responsibility, in such a position of leadership as he hold as host of the Today Show, to not make vain pronouncements without first educating himself thoroughly. Katie Couric speaks about colon cancer from deep and thorugh study and personal experience. That is not glib. Matt Lauer speaks about Ritalin from what he's seen in the News. That's glib.

    And it is not about "sharing or not sharing beliefs" - it's about documented fact. Ritalin IS a street drug. 1 out of every 10 kids in the US are being doped. Ritalin IS addictive, and it IS an amphetamine-like substance (more addictive than cocaine.)

    You say "It is an irresponsible (and ill-informed) statement to say that there is no biological cause for depression." And yet Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical, told Katie Couric in a followup interview that he concurs with Cruise, that there's been no medical evidence of the "chemical imbalance in the brain" theory.

    Notice, by the way, that ALL commercials for Paxil, Prozac and the like are careful to say "you *may* have a chemical imbalance" and "it *may* be due to..." they use the word "may" because they're forbidden by the FDA to claim that there IS a chemical imbalance, because there is no proof.

    You say that drugs can help people. What is "help"? Because a person could take X and feel "better", and a person could smoke pot and feel "happy", or take cocaine and feel "powerful" - but is this really helping them? Keep in mind that LSD was a psychiatric drug, invented by psychiatrists.

    In a study as thorough as the ones used to approve drugs, it was proven that diet and exercise were AS EFFECTIVE as Zoloft to improve mild to medium depression. Why take the drug then? Why risk the addiction, the side-effects, the suicidal ideation?

    TC did not "condemn" anyone. But he did not agree with a celebrity endorsing a drug which he knows to be harmful. Brooke Shields promoted Paxil in her book. Paxil is related to many, many deaths and violent acts. It is banned for minor in the UK. There are "paxil survivors" groups on the Net.

    You wonder iif TC's refusal to allow medical intervention includes dental cleanings, mole removals or laser eye surgery - I have your answer: No Scientologist opposes medical treatment. We do oppose, vehemeently, the cult of psychiatry cloaking itself in medical terms to promote methods which have no medical basis.

    Scientologists do get teeth cleanings, mole removals, surgery, etc. In fact, when I lived in Hollywood I used to go to the same clinic where TC got his medical checkups (never met him though.)

    There are many Scientologists who are themselves medical doctors, dentists and nurses.

  • 17 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 6:47 pm

    To K:

    On: Thetans, etc.

    theta: energy peculiar to life or a thetan which acts upon material in the physical universe and animates it, mobilizes it and changes it; natural creative energy of a thetan which he has free to direct toward survival goals, especially when it manifests itself as high tone, constructive communications. See also thetan.

    thetan: the person himself - not his body or his name, the physical universe, his mind, or anything else; that which is aware of being aware; the identity which is the individual. The term was coined to eliminate any possible confusion with older, invalid concepts. It comes from the Greek letter Theta, which the Greeks used to represent thought or perhaps spirit, to which an n is added to make a noun in the modern style used to create words in engineering. It is also n, or “theta to the nth degree,” meaning unlimited or vast.

    (From the Scientology glossary)

  • 18 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 6:52 pm

    To K:

    more on Thetans:

    A thetan is YOU. You are a thetan. You do not "have a soul", you ARE a soul, an eternal spiritual being.

    In the early 50s, when thousands of people were using Mr. Hubbard's methods of counseling, more and more data was emerging about past lives. It cause quite a debate. Some said to leave it alone, that it would cause controversy and discredit the practice. Mr. Hubbard conducted side-by-side studies of groups that got counseling that allowed for past lives, and groups that didn't. The ones that were allowed to delve in past lives improved considerably faster than the ones who didn't.

    From this, it became standard practice that what the person brings up in session is not dismissed, censored or evaluated. It is accepted as-is, and the counselor simply steers the person's attention to that which brings about the most improvement (emotionally, mentally) in the person.

    As Scientology became an organized body of data, the premise that we as spirits live many, many lifetimes was simply accepted as an empirical fact.

  • 19 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 6:55 pm

    A Scientology article on Past Lives"

    A Scientolgy article on the phenomena of death

  • 20 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 6:56 pm

    A Scientology article about the Supreme Being

    "The Rehabilitation of the Human Spirit", by L. Ron Hubbard

  • 21 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 7:08 pm

    To K:

    More on Thetans:

    (I hope I don't get yelled at for "proselytizing" - all this is "take it or leave it", and is written in response to K's questions.)

    No K, the stuff on aliens is neither "core" nor a "belief."

    Now, it stands to reason that, if we are eternal beings that have lived since way before Earth, that we have therefore lived elsewhere. (I mean, duh.)

    But that hardly makes you or me an alien! :-)

    I am reminded of a funny line in "Star Trek 5, The Voyage Home" - Kirk is asked "are you from Outer Space?" and he replies "No, I'm from Iowa! I just *work* in Outer Space."

    Anyway, we are not aliens. Neither you nor me. We are from 'round here. The question is, where did we come from?

    Many, many (most, in fact) religions believe that we did not start right here on Earth, or at least not in the way that we are now.

    The Hindus speak of celestial battles between gods. The Abrahamic religions speak about a fall from grace, about a banishment from paradise.

    Scientology is not a belief system. But it does have at its core a system of counseling which helps you regain a sense of self, and a higher awareness of who you are. Part of this is past-life memories.

    But a very important part of Scientology practice is to not coerce or force ANYONE to "believe" or "accept" or adopt any preconceived notion about where you came from, or how you came to be where you are, etc.
    It is an individual journey.

    Now, Hubbard did write many of his findings from thousands of cases in his research. This was to be taken by auditors as direction for use in counseling, not to be adopted as dogma.
    It is not a question of whether this stuff is real, it is not a question of how much of it is subjective, but simply that, when addressed in session, it yields results and an improved condition in the person.

    There are a few disgruntled angry apostates who for one reason or another hate Scientology. You can find some of them here. A few of these individuals have stolen Church materials and posted them illegally on the Web, out of context, to try and paint a picture that we're a kooky cult. Anyone who knows a Scientologist personally knows this is not so.

  • 22 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 7:15 pm

    Hi K,

    On audting:

    Auditing (meaning to listen) is Scientology spiritual counseling.

    An auditor can be someone trained on a few basic techniques for improving a person's overall wellbeing, as in the case of our volunteer ministers.

    A professional auditor, however, follows a trainig path much more rigorous than the average psychiatrist, and a Class VI Auditor undergoes about 3 times the amount of training in the subject of the human mind and spirit (in hours alone) than any shrink.

    Auditing follows very rigorous procedures, that an auditor does not deviate from. It is not just talking and listening. It is a specific methodology, a directive form of counseling, where the subject is guided, by specific questions, to gain understandings about him/herself.

    Just exactly what these understandings are, is a very personal, very individual journey. It varies considerably from person to person.

    But it follows a specific path, which is described here.

  • 23 - Greg

    Jul 12, 2005 at 7:17 pm

    Here is some great information on Scientology auditing.

    Ok, phew! I gotta take a break now. :-)

  • 24 - KYS

    Jul 12, 2005 at 9:28 pm

    Greg-
    Thank you for all this info. When I tried to learn more through the Scientology website the information was vague and usually pointed me in the direction of a book purchase. Give me a chance to digest what you've sent and I will respond (likely off-line through your website, with your permission).

    I still believe TC is out of line.., I work in a research environment (and know how to critically review scientific data) and I have a personal family history of psychiatric illness. I can tell you that diet and exercise do not solve all psychiatric issues- trust me, I know. Psychiatry has helped people. TC was irresponsible to make such a blanket statement, and did a great disservice to Ms. Shields.

    Best,
    K

  • 25 - Greg

    Jul 13, 2005 at 4:20 pm

    Hi K;

    Cool, contact me whenever you want to.

    I understand what you mean about blanket statements. Personally, I believe we could've made his point in a different way. But I'm glad he spoke up, remaining silent is often the choice of cowards.

    I do agree that diet and exercise do not solve every mental issue (I refuse to call it psychiatric issue - Geez! Has psychiatry ever become the State Religion!)

    Looking forward to more dialog.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs