Think Twice Before Giving Your Child a Disease as a Birthday Present

Part of: Spotlight on Spirituality and Health

I like toy stores. Seeing the old classics (Legos, pogo sticks, balsa wood gliders, etc.) always provides a pleasant reminder of childhood innocence.

Yet on a recent visit to my local toy store, my reminiscing received a disturbing jolt.

Turning a corner, I found myself confronted with colorful representations of various disease microbes like “Cholera,” "Anthrax,” and “The Pox”! Each was a huggable-looking stuffed toy with big playful eyes. They were also tagged with “Fact” descriptions noting the prevalence and frequency of each ailment.toy

All I could think was: Why? Don’t we hear enough about health problems on television commercials? Now dreaded diseases are being represented as attractive, lovable toys for children to adore! 

What would you think if your little one unwrapped a birthday gift only to exclaim, "I've got polio!" A 2007 Newsweek article addressing the toys noted, "This combination of gag gift and educational toy can be an awkward marketing fit. Toy stores steer clear of STDs, and [the manufacturer] aims bugs like HIV at health-care professionals..."

Are these really the type of “educational” toys to give small children? I can think of so many more important things to teach children than about cholera or the black death. And the toy store I visited didn’t get the message about steering “clear of STDs.” The stuffed “Herpes” toy was front and center.

I asked the woman at the register about the colorful stuffed microbes and she told me they were popular with doctors and nurses. OK, fair enough, but why are they being sold in a children's toy store?  

For instance, each tag includes a child safety precaution that notes, “Remove plastic hangtags and ribbons before giving to a child under three years of age.” Does this mean there is an educational motive to get children over three years old to read which stuffed disease microbe they are snuggling up with for the night? Sounds like some scary science fiction novel, doesn’t it?

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for bill-scott

Article Author: Bill Scott

A retired architect, Bill Scott works to correct misunderstandings about Christian Science as the Christian Science Committee on Publication for Washington State.

Visit Bill Scott's author pageBill Scott's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Dr Dreadful

    May 04, 2012 at 8:30 am

    I would have thought giving children stuffed toys representing diseases for their birthday was the least of our worries, especially when there are plenty of idiot parents giving kids actual diseases for their birthday by refusing to get them vaccinated.

  • 2 - KG

    May 04, 2012 at 8:51 am

    They're made for science geeks. If you don't like it, don't buy them. Personally, I love the idea that kids can see in plush form the diversity of shapes in our microbe world.

  • 3 - Dr. Joseph S. Maresca

    May 04, 2012 at 11:32 am

    Children handle all kinds of toys in pre-kindergarten and the early grades. The thing to do is to discuss environmentally friendly cleansers with your medical provider.

    The typical environmentally friendly cleansers are baking soda, alcohol, white vinegar (for floors) and hydrogen peroxide. Definitely stay clear of substances loaded with inorganics.

  • 4 - Dan Barnes

    May 05, 2012 at 4:34 am

    Perhaps the idea of a stuffed toy representing a disease needs rethinking, but the educative features here are important - surely the ability of these toys to spread disease awareness in young children is a good thing?

  • 5 - STM

    May 07, 2012 at 4:42 am

    Geez, what happened to the good old days when a childhood was a childhood and a stuffed toy was called "Spot" ... and not the kind of spots you get from smallpox or anthrax.

    Seriously, what's going on with this planet?

    As for Dan's reply above, a good idea? Not so much.

    Kids can be educated about deadly diseas when they're about 14 or 15, by picking up a book and reading about it.

    In the meantime, let's have rhe 0-13s actually having a childhood.

    Besides, where I come from there's enough risks in nature for kids to worry about -including deadly massive ocean sweels, fast-flowing rivers and flash floods, bushfire, sunburn so bad it resembles a burn from a flame, riptides, crocodiles, sharks, deadly snakes and spiders, poison jelly fish and venomous octopus, stingrays, poison-spined shells and fish, canetoads, cockroaches the side of mice, rodent plagues, etc - without throwing deadly germs into the mix as well.

    I can teach my kids to spot a rip and how to get out of one if caught, or why you need to shake out your shoes every morning, but the idea of a olethora of deadly germs floating unseen in the air might just have tipped them over the edge.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs