Sweeney Todd on B'way

Sweeney Todd
by Stephen Sondheim & Hugh Wheeler
starring Michael Cerveris & Patti LuPone
on Broadway, at the Eugene O'Neill Theatre (in previews)

I've always felt that what's wrong with Sweeney Todd is that it fits just a bit too comfortably into the New York City Opera repertoire, where it has been given the ultimate stamp of prestige for a musical. But what's Stephen Sondheim doing writing a grand opera in Victorian garb? And what's a piece supposedly telling us "we all deserve to die" and we are victims of post-industrial alienation doing entertaining the Lincoln Center set in a huge glitzy opera house? (Yeah, what about Wozzeck, you'll say. Fine.) And while Sweeney always delivers some chills and some of Sondheim's grimmest music and lyrics, all the dress-up of it has struck me as not a little pretentious and disingenuous.

Well British director John Doyle has rectified many of these problems. His new production--originally for his own Watermill company in the UK, now restaged on Broadway with an American cast--certainly ain't your father's Sweeney Todd. Or Hal Prince's, at least. Performed by a cast of ten on a claustrophobic stage platform of wooden planks, under harsh white lights, there's nothing lavish about it. And, except for what seems to be the setting of an old apothecary shop, nothing Victorian. Nostalgic for Angela Lansbury's cute red pigtails? Well, gone are the traditional costumes, too, in favor of a wash of generically modern 20th century blacks-and-whites. Sweeney, in his mid-size black leather coat and black skinny tie here resembles a classic gangster or Gestapo agent more than George Hearn's vintage sideburn-twirling villain in a barber's apron. By stripping away the (automatically) comforting and familiar Victorian trappings, Doyle lets us see Sweeney for the 20th century--I dare say modernist--piece it is.

To call Doyle production "Brechtian" might be too facile. There is indeed a "frame" which provides layers of mediation and distance between us and the proceedings. (Basically, it's presented as the vision of the boy, Tobias, supervised by actors in white lab coats. Sweeney himself appears almost as the boogeyman of the boy's fantasies.) Doyle is actually reclaiming the show's roots in Brecht, believe it or not. I was always under the general impression Sweeney was based on an authentic melodrama by this "Christopher Bond," some forgotten 19th century hack, I assumed. But not so fast. Look at what his program bio reveals:

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for playgoer

Article Author: Playgoer

Garrett Eisler started the blog, The Playgoer, in May 2005. He has also reviewed theatre for the Village Voice and Time Out New York, and written articles for American Theatre magazine, Stage Directions, and the Best Plays Theater Yearbook series.

Visit Playgoer's author pagePlaygoer's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Oct 24, 2005 at 6:39 pm

    absolutely splendid GE, we are starving for live theater reviews - thanks!

  • 2 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 24, 2005 at 6:58 pm

    I have seen Sweeney Todd twice -- the original cast performance on Broadway and the City Opera production. Both were wonderful, IMO. At the same time, I pray the gods shine upon me so that I can see this new version. It sounds absolutely intriguing, and reinventions help to make the Great White Way great. I remember Mendes' Gypsy; it was a hit-or-miss production, but very exciting nonetheless. Part of the thrill is seeing whether the new company can pull off a reinvention. Here's hoping that the new Sweeney Todd is a dark, demonic gem.

  • 3 - doodlenyc

    Oct 25, 2005 at 11:05 am

    This is not the first revival on Broadway for Sweeney Todd. there was a revival in 1989 with Beth Fowler and Bob Gunton, directed by Susan Schulman. It is often called Teeney Todd because it was much scaled down from the original production directed by Hal Prince

  • 4 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 25, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    Teeney Todd, the wee-mon barber of Fleet Street?

    I am a Beth Fowler fan, but missed that one.

  • 5 - Emily

    Nov 02, 2005 at 11:36 pm

    I saw the prduction on Monday and I don't really agree with you about the false endings. I don't feel that the lovers needed a garish blocked resolution; it would have taken away from the theme. I like how toned down they were, and I found myself enjoying the Nightinggale song, which usually grates on my nerves. In the end, The lovers do emote whilst playing, and it is obvious if you are taking in all of the action on the stage and not just the main action. The story is sort of told from Toby's perspective, a perspective that seeps into your perspective as an audience member. Toby's ending was ceremonial and blocked as that was necessary to the theme. I liked that he was trapped, living, a fate worse than death. Anyway, that's my take on it.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 11, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs