Suri Cruise: "Funny Looking" But "Doing Great"?

I am no conspiracy theorist, folks, but even I have to wonder about the circumstances surrounding the birth and very early life of Suri Cruise, now almost three-months-old.

Not only have parents Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes kept her hidden her from view – which is just odd, what's the point of having a baby if you aren't going to show perfect strangers her little Festeresque countenance? – but oddities regarding her birth records are puzzling as well.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting The latest intelligence to emerge on the missing Cruiseling is a three-page US magazine spread featuring a pic of Katie sipping coffee with a friend while vacationing in Telluride, Colorado. When asked about Suri by the US photogs, Katie responded cheerfully, "Suri's doing great. She's back at the house."

Tom was nowhere to be seen, but there were reports from locals that a baby was spotted and one clerk at a natural foods store reportedly said the baby (presumed to be Suri) was "funny looking."

Not sure if "funny looking" is meant to mean the baby was "comical" or a bit "off," but considering virtually all newborns are "funny looking," we can only guess at the implications for little Suri. 

As the mother of two children, I am inclined to not entertain other people's idea of what's cute in a baby. All babies are beautiful to their parents and sometimes they are the only ones who think this; but Photobucket - Video and Image Hostingall questionable "funny" business aside, strange goings-on with Suri's birth certificate are a curiosity.

Celebrity sleuths at TMZ did some digging and have discovered some odd irregularities regarding the child's birth records.

Suri was born on April 18, but athough St. John's Hospital has a policy of filing birth certificates within 10 days of birth, the certificate was not filed until May 8, 20 days later.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dawn-olsen

Article Author: Dawn Olsen

Dawn Olsen is a veteran blogger who proudly supports the guy who publishes this awesome site. When not engaging in neologistical pursuits, she writes about popular culture, Hollywood and those fanciful creatures called "celebrities" at Glosslip.com. …

Visit Dawn Olsen's author pageDawn Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 12, 2006 at 5:47 pm

    thanks Dawn, Rosemary's Baby comes to mind

  • 2 - Dawn

    Jul 12, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    Oh, that's not nice. Maybe Suri just has a lot of hair. On her head hopefully.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 12, 2006 at 5:59 pm

    so that would be the Suri with the Fringe On Top?

  • 4 - Shannon Okey

    Jul 12, 2006 at 6:34 pm

    Oh, that's bad, Eric. Just bad...

  • 5 - Eric Olsen

    Jul 12, 2006 at 6:38 pm

    Hi Shannon! I agree, really really bad

  • 6 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Jul 12, 2006 at 6:45 pm

    You don't know the history of ugly babies. I do.

  • 7 - Eric Berlin

    Jul 12, 2006 at 7:33 pm

    One would have to imagine that there's some kind of bad pub in the public seeing that baby... which is really really sad, isn't it?

  • 8 - manfred

    Jul 12, 2006 at 7:53 pm

    Anyone read how Will Smith and wife Jada came to the Cruise mansion and wanted to see the baby but they blown off by Tom and Will felt insulted and asked: DOES SHE EVEN EXIST MAN?

    Hehe I found that pretty funny too.

    Anyway nice article, really makes me wonder if that baby is real.

    -manfred

  • 9 - gossett

    Jul 12, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    you guys should be pretty proud of yourselves for making fun of a new born baby and his parents....maybe they want their privacy,at least their not abusing their child like britney spears.

  • 10 - lynn

    Jul 12, 2006 at 10:08 pm

    I agree with gossett Privacy and some parents are very protective Maybe they are like that. Heck every one hears and sees Brad's baby Kinda boring now. let them come forth when they re ready. and knowing from experience. One is over joyed with the birth of ones child that filing paper work is the last thing on ones mind. So going over the 10 days no big deal. Give them there privacy.

  • 11 - Mary K. Williams

    Jul 12, 2006 at 11:29 pm

    I'm sure she's positively breathtaking!

  • 12 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Jul 12, 2006 at 11:50 pm

    ...And that's a wrap, everybody. Mary wins. See you all next time!

  • 13 - Charles Almon

    Jul 12, 2006 at 11:52 pm

    I'll bet she looks like Sluggo from the old Nancy comic strip. Who's Suri now!

  • 14 - Joanie

    Jul 13, 2006 at 12:20 am

    Heffernan brings to mind The King of Queens. Heh.

    And, she IS a registered nurse midwife. If she didn't actually attend the birth or see the baby, her signature might only mean she was responsible for the person who did. Still, as a nurse myself, I wouldn't want to risk my license on something I didn't personally witness. Most nurse clinicians would also refuse to do so.

  • 15 - TonaWanda

    Jul 13, 2006 at 12:31 am

    Wow, celebs are one thing, but picking on innocent children who didn't ask to be born into the life is pretty tacky.

    Sure the parents actions are odd, as is everything Scientology, but leave the kid out of it.

    I have to wonder if you really are a mother of two.

  • 16 - duane

    Jul 13, 2006 at 12:54 am

    Innocent!? Hah! Innocent, my eye. You should get a load of this kid. Selfish as all hell, constantly crying and whining over this or that. Just laying around the house not lifting a finger to help out. Too lazy or spoiled or something to get up and go to the bathroom. Overeats and pukes all over everything. Eating disorder anyone? Probably obsessing over her weight. So Hollywood. Sleeps all the time, content to freeload off the parents. Another typical self-centered rich kid who thinks the world should be served up on a silver platter. Innocent ... bah!

  • 17 - Jewels

    Jul 13, 2006 at 2:03 am

    duane, babies live to puke; it is their only real physical activity beside screaming...and well, 'making pants' - you know - when it's time to change the Pampers...

  • 18 - suraiya

    Jul 13, 2006 at 6:44 am

    Let them be for God's sake!

  • 19 - Barb

    Jul 13, 2006 at 7:03 am

    I think they're geniuses. By not showing the baby they're creating interest, questions about them and the baby thus increasing their box office bankability.

  • 20 - Chris Evans

    Jul 13, 2006 at 9:56 am

    I honestly wish TomKat would go eat shit and die.

    Tom Cruise's talent doesn't live up to his celebrity--and poor Katie Holmes needs to be set free.

  • 21 - robert

    Jul 13, 2006 at 11:01 am

    who the fuck cares anyways?? they're celebrities, so what? does that give any of you the right to know ANYTHING about their personal lives?

  • 22 - Eric Berlin

    Jul 13, 2006 at 11:42 am

    There are plenty of celebrities who live very private lives, because they choose not to plaster themselves over the public consciousness via every means imaginable. So, Cruise and Holmes have managed to perk the interest of the public what with the hopping on Oprah's couch and interviews and carefully engineered photo ops, etc. etc. Now that interest is perked, it's natural for that curiosity to extend to the whereabouts of the uber-couple's child, isn't it?

  • 23 - Mark Saleski

    Jul 13, 2006 at 11:50 am

    my interest in suri was perked, until i started seeing that Taylor Hicks ford ad. now i'm just dying to know what these "possibilities" are all about.

  • 24 - DJRadiohead

    Jul 13, 2006 at 12:40 pm

    When people do bizarre things, other people are going to talk about it whether they are celebrities or not.

    Dawn, you took it too easy on them. Don't go getting soft on us! =)

  • 25 - Texas

    Jul 13, 2006 at 1:01 pm

    This is why Tom and Katie want privacy. Comments like, "funny looking" is the very reason why I wouldn't want my kid photographed either.

    Everyone isn't like Brad and Angelina(home wrecker) and bid their baby's photo to the higher bidder. I think that was a way to rub it in Jennifer's face.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 18, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs