So You Want To Be A Critic? - Page 7

And then there are the closes that probably leave the reader cold:

"Rather than continue to babble on in a vain attempt to describe the book, let me just say that it is a darn good read and one I would recommend to anyone. Interesting characters, thought-provoking, easy to read, it has it all. If you like your fiction intelligent and suspenseful, Spies should be on your list."

The last two lines are good. The first two inadvertently say, “Why should you listen to me. I’m just babbling and can’t really describe the book anyway.”

Conclusion

If the point hasn’t been driven home by now, let’s make it simple: Being a critic is hard work, it requires study and analysis. Being a critic means sitting in a theater or music hall with a notepad on your lap, trying to capture everything going on around you without losing the essence of the experience.

When I was a theater reviewer many years ago, friends who’d accompany me would ask, “How can you enjoy the play when you’re always taking notes and tearing it apart like that.”

Hence the “like” vs. “good” issue. Critics enjoy the work more because they understand how difficult it is to get all the elements to come together in a masterpiece, or they can see which elements failed which caused the piece to not be a masterpiece. Ask yourself, who would appreciate a jazz album more, Thelonius Monk or a five-year-old. (Note, I didn’t say enjoy. Appreciate is an aesthetic experience, enjoy is a personal one.

Being a critic can be one of the most satisfying things you’ll ever do - but you’ll only succeed if you know what the hell you’re doing. The more you know, the more you’ll appreciate the work of art. And the more you know, the easier it’ll be to break all the rules and still write great reviews.

Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6 — Page 7

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for mark-schannon

Article Author: Mark Schannon

Crisis/risk/issues management and communications and PR consultant, free-lance writer, aspiring pundit and author. Blogcritics.org asst. ed, politics. Wanted to set world on fire, but bride won't let me play with matches, so I'm counting on upcoming, …

Visit Mark Schannon's author pageMark Schannon's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Gordon Hauptfleisch

    May 23, 2006 at 2:14 am

    Mark, you had me at "Bad, Naked Girls With Kinky Tattoos." I laughed, I cried, I learned, dammit.

    Good stuff, well-expressed. To quote you: You "started with a clear idea of what you wanted to communicate to your audience [and] you created a smooth-flowing analysis that helps the reader understand that idea."

  • 2 - Nicholas Stix

    May 23, 2006 at 9:02 am

    I'm just putting my mark on this so I can find it to read later today.

  • 3 - mschannon

    May 23, 2006 at 9:24 am

    Gordon,

    Thanks. I do appreciate the comments. I put more time into this *&%$^& article than into my doctoral thesis--wait a minute, I never wrote a doctoral thesis. Well, you get the idea. Glad it's appreciated.

    In Decaf Veritas

  • 4 - chantal stone

    May 23, 2006 at 9:43 am

    Mark...as soon as I buy some printer ink, I'm going to print this out for reference. Great job, and THANKS for the advice!

  • 5 - mschannon

    May 23, 2006 at 11:13 am

    Chantal, bless you, my dear. All compliments welcome--and needed.

  • 6 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    May 23, 2006 at 11:33 am

    Mark, excellent article. Much of this advice holds for writing any article, and a lot of the things you write here also go for writng a short story s well. Reminds me an awful lot of the kinds of things that Emily Crofford used to teach is in a junior high in east Saint Paul 25 years ago...

    She didn't drink decaf, though.

    Ha'emét nimtzá b'kafé hafúkh
    (in 'Kaffee mit Schlag' veritas)

  • 7 - mschannon

    May 23, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    Ruvy, good writing is good writing, regardless of the form...point well taken. (By the way, I haven't ignored your two e-mails--I've just been too buy to give them the time they deserve, but I will read them.)

    I'm sorry, though, Kaffee mit Schlag sounds German...I ain't doin' no German tag line. Plus, at some point, I'm going to drink again & I can return to the truth...

    In Jameson Veritas...

    But thank's anyway.

  • 8 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    May 23, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    "...Kaffee mit Schlag sounds German...I ain't doin' no German tag line."

    Well, I think, sir, that I'll use a Hebrew one.

    Reshít Hokhmá yir'át Hashém
    The beginning of wisdom is fear of G-d


  • 9 - mschannon

    May 23, 2006 at 5:13 pm

    Ruvy,

    I guess I'm dumber than a rock. I refuse to be afraid of God. If I ever make the leap of faith, I may learn to respect, admire, love, be in awe of....etc. But fear...never.

    Life should not be dominated by fear...of God or anyone/anything else. Life is a blessing, a gift--who know's from where--and should be cherished for what it offers even in the face of everything that would cause one pain.

    I don't know if you've read John Spivey's articles or books, but I believe he is on the right track, and I'm even considering giving up my curmudgeon status in my spiritual quest. John tells the story of the Bhudda holding up a flower and only one person in the crowd smiling--understanding the significane.

    I once understood it, and John's example brought it back to me. It's not deep, metaphorical, spiritual...it's not cosmic consciousness. It's a simplicity of appreciation for the flower for what it is, asking nothing more from it but to be allowed to appreciate its beauty.

    Every step on our journey offers moments of awe that sound trivial. A rock in a garden that somehow just fits right. A smile from a stranger. An upwelling of joy just for the privilege of being alive. Helping another for no other reason that it's a good thing to do.

    Where in all of that could a fear of God exist? (Hmmm. I'm on my way to an article here, I think.)

    I keep coming back to that Thoreau quote: "Most men lead lives of quiet desperation and go to their graves with the song still in them."

    Fear of God? Doesn't that foster desperation? The last few years have been difficult for me, and for a while I gave in to desperation. I've worked my way out...with some help from John.

    I will learn to fear nothing...not through strife or struggle but through acceptance of myself and the world in which I find myself.

    Ruvy, I'm afraid your God and the one I wished I could believe in are very, very different. I hope you find comfort, peace, and tranquillity in yours--but at least from what I've seen of American Jews, that's something we're not very good at.

    Know, however, how much I value your friendship and knowledge.

  • 10 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    May 23, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    Mark,

    The common translation of the word yir'á is "fear." A more apporpriate translation of the sense of the word is not so much "fear" as "awe." In other words, one stands in awe of the Almighty - and this is the beginning of wisdom.

    Example. A man sits on a bus and fears - very nearly trembles in fear - over the coming shut-off of his electricity if he fails to pay the bill. And he hasn't got the money and doesn't know where h will get it. For a moment, he calms himself and asks "what is he supposed to learn from all this?" And he has the "ahah!" moment of realizing that rather than being in fear of the electric company and what it can do to him, he should be in awe of G-d and how He can help him. A sense of serenity and clear-mindedness returns and he is able to try to formjulate what he should do.

    Standing in awe of the Almighty is the beginninig of his wisdom.

    Reshít Hokhmá yir'át Hashém

  • 11 - mschannon

    May 23, 2006 at 6:45 pm

    Ruvy, now you tell me after my long diatribe!!!

    I'm perfectly happy being in awe of God if only He'd show himself. Awe is good. Fear is bad. Except (there's always an except) I have trouble with this notion of God interceding on our behalf. But that's another diatribe, and it's time for dinner, LOL.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    In Awe Veritas

  • 12 - chantal stone

    May 23, 2006 at 11:19 pm

    Mark...wow...you really should expand #9 into an article. Very good, indeed.


    In diet coke Veritas

  • 13 - mschannon

    May 24, 2006 at 12:34 am

    Thanks,Chantal. I was actually doing that when Ruvy pulled the rug out from under me by substituting awe for fear. However, there's enough religion based on fear of God that it still might work.

    Those sneaking Israelis!

    In Decaf Veritas

  • 14 - chantal stone

    May 24, 2006 at 12:40 am

    it'll definitely work...go with it

    in pinot noir veritas

  • 15 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    May 24, 2006 at 3:42 am

    Mark,

    G-d shows His wonders (if not Himself) to those who put faith in Him. The grace after meals pulls a line from Jeremiah to illustrate the idea. "Blessed is he who trusts in G-d for G-d shall be his security."

    I've seen this in my life and my wife's life - far too many times to be mere coincidence or good luck - this comes from a former atheist, Mark, not some yehiva boy.

  • 16 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    May 24, 2006 at 3:45 am

    And don't forget the line, Mark.

    Reshít Hokhmá yir'át HaShém.

  • 17 - mschannon

    May 24, 2006 at 10:55 am

    Ruvy, a born-again Christian arch conservative web-friend who I happen to like and respect a lot asked me to read this book about how God's hand was apparent in the founding of America. The two authors were Yale-educated and the book was well-written.

    The problem with the book was what can only be called unconscious selective evidence. (In individuals, its unconscious selective recall.) They picked examples of when bad things happened after people fell from a state of grace and what good things happened when they regained it. But they ignored the good things happening to people who never met Grace & vice versa.

    If one prays and lives a good life according to the laws of God, good things will happen to them. Sometimes bad things will happen. If someone lives a bad life, ignoring God, the same thing will happen.

    There's an old philosophical theory called Occham's razor which states that the simplest explanation is the correct one. Also, an extraneous parts of a theory have no value to the theory.

    Translated, everything one's experienced in life can be explained without God's intervention--hence there's no rational reason to include Him.

    That doesn't mean He doesn't intervene. It just means it cannot be proven by rational methods, which, for religious people, should be a positive. If one could rationally define God, then He wouldn't be God.

    And I haven't forgotten the quote--I'm just choosing another path.

    (Damn, I wish we could sit down and talk for about 2 days--or 3 or 4. You should come visit the U.S. I'll even fall off the wagon so we can drink and be merry as we argue into the wee hours of the morning.)

    In Decaf Veritas

  • 18 - temporal

    May 24, 2006 at 11:09 am

    mark:

    can you post this at desicritic also?

  • 19 - mschannon

    May 24, 2006 at 11:56 am

    Temporal, absolutely, as soon as I figure out how.

  • 20 - temporal

    May 24, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    aaman will help you join and set up passwords etc.

    have sent him an email

  • 21 - Matt SUGRUE

    Dec 28, 2007 at 1:16 am

    my wife says I cant be a critic but Hello... Cabin boy was possibly the most underated film of the century

  • 22 - Matt Sugrue

    Dec 28, 2007 at 2:53 am

    hope to trade opinions about all entertainment related coolness

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 12, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs