Real Estate Information Distribution Companies Steal Brands To Market In Google

Inman News reported today that companies like AgentConnect have been buying keywords like "Prudential," "Century 21" and "Coldwell Banker" (and perhaps even other keywords like "RE/MAX" and "Realty Executives," but none of them came up in the recent search by Inman News) in order to lure real estate buyers and sellers into their web so they can take their names, contact information and alleged real estate need, then redistribute that information to a Realtor in exchange for money. Must be nice to get away with scamming the real estate industry and prospective buyers and sellers, huh?

Services such as these do not work. I tried one of these services one time, only the company I used was Service Magic. The lead said the person wanted to buy and sell. For a $60 investment, the return I would have received in two closed sales would have been worth it, however, after calling the person who filled out Service Magic's form, he informed me that he didn't want to buy or sell, he just wanted to see if a real estate agent would call him. Well, it worked for him, but he paid nothing. I, on the other hand, was out $60.

Companies such as Service Magic and AgentConnect should be required by law to screen the potential clients that they are selling to Realtors, prior to a Realtor paying for that information, thinking it's an actual lead. A lead that is purchased for say, $60, should be guaranteed to lead to an actual prospect, because if it doesn't, these companies are wasting Realtors' time and money, and since Realtors are their customers, if they don't become more professional, don't look for them to be around for too much longer. Remember, cold calling and warm calling are both cheaper and easier to guarantee leads that become prospects, then buyers or sellers. Realtors should be getting their leads by farming, not buying them from companies that can't even guarantee the information, and are even using unethical methods to market, such as using the brand names of other companies, without their permission.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - John Mudd

    Jul 04, 2004 at 12:11 pm

    Eric,

    Could this spam be removed, please? It's rather disgusting, and it has nothing to do with the post. Thanks.

  • 2 - Scott

    May 10, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    Companies that do this kind of thing need to be reported. It is pretty unethical.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs