Radio Host Fired For Slip of Tongue

A St. Louis radio talk show host, Dave Lenihan, was fired on the air this week after making a racial slur, in what seems, to this pundit anyway, clearly an accidental slip of the tongue.

Just prior to this on-air flub, the host praised the Secretary of State Condolezza Rice's illustrious career. He did so in a manner that would preclude any normal human from assuming that he was also an undercover racist seeking to destroy Ms. Rice. Here's the statement in question:

    "She's been chancellor of Stanford," Lenihan said on the air. "She's got the patent resume of somebody that has serious skill. She loves football. She's African-American, which would kind of be a big coon. A big coon. Oh my God. I am totally, totally, totally, totally, totally sorry for that."

Mr. Lenihan clearly was remorseful and knew immediately he'd made a major screwup. Does that sound like someone trying to project a racist view? And how coy of him to use a racial epithet that's so old and unused that the typical young person today would assume he was talking about the nocturnal creature most known for knocking over trashcans.

But no, we must make an example of this man and our society's complete lack of common sense. Now were this, say, Imus, Trent Lott, or Rush Limbaugh, or anyone on the Fox News channel who did this, I might be a bit more skeptical as to their internal motives. But this guy doesn't have a racist rap sheet. He's just some radio host who did what each of us has done at least once in our lives: fumbled his words. Mr. Lenihan has continued to express in statements regarding the incident, that he was trying to say "coup" but instead the now infamous slur came out.

This reminded me of a similar incident I had a few years back. While cleaning up the kitchen at my in-laws one day, I off-handedly mentioned Eric having left his glass of milk "vicariously perched on the edge of the table" just waiting for someone to knock it over (typical of his absent-mindedness) and was met with knee-slapping laughter by my sweet, but hardly without faults mother-in-law and Eric, of course. I am often reminded of this verbal misstep which still brings inexplicable laughter from all parties whenever it's mentioned. I find it embarrasing and mildly annoying, but the consequences and flub weren't nearly so severe as Mr. Lenihan's.

Clearly, I meant precariously perched. Precarious, vicarious, my addled brain could hardly distinguish the two very different words. I spoke before I thought thoroughly and so did perhaps Lenihan. "Coup" certainly fits the context far more than "a big coon" which really couldn't describe anyone, let alone the inimitable Condi Rice. Well, maybe that overweight catfood thief with a furry face and paws that shows up on our back deck, but that's about it.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dawn-olsen

Article Author: Dawn Olsen

Dawn Olsen is a veteran blogger who proudly supports the guy who publishes this awesome site. When not engaging in neologistical pursuits, she writes about popular culture, Hollywood and those fanciful creatures called "celebrities" at Glosslip.com. …

Visit Dawn Olsen's author pageDawn Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Carmine

    Mar 25, 2006 at 6:16 pm

    I adore Condoleezza Rice and would gladly vote for her for president. But my word, when PC insanity leads to this poor buffoon Lenihan being fired that is just plain wrong. I could see how nut case intolerant feminists like Katha Pollit or Ros Baxandall would salivate over the opportunity to destroy someone's carreer like this. But I am sure Dr. Rice is vastly more kind and reasonable than any of those types. So I hope she somehow rises above all this and makes a pitch to save this poor guy his job. After all the PC crowd still refuses to recognize that Muslims are actually murdering women on a daily basis. We need to respect their culture even if it does lead to the death, stoning and honor killing of their own daughters, sisters and mothers. The PC academics still pretend that somehow Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot were actually good if misunderstood Marxists. All their murders were somehow the fault of America and colonial nations that made them do it. And of course, PC is synonomous with anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. Please Dr. Rice don't be like the fraudlent professional victims who now want to claim you as one of their own. Dr. Condoleezza Rice you are above these third wave PC losers. Dr. Rice you are a real intellectual and a real international leader; let this poor little bufuddled guy keep his job. Really.

  • 2 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Mar 25, 2006 at 6:53 pm

    Maybe he has Ron Burgundy Syndrome and someone wrote that on his notes.

    I bet it was WES MANTOOTH!

  • 3 - Lisa Bee

    Mar 25, 2006 at 7:15 pm

    I think you meant, "racial EPITHET", not epitaph. Otherwise, I'm with you on this one. What a waste of time to go after this guy for an honest mistake.

  • 4 - Dawn

    Mar 25, 2006 at 7:28 pm

    See Lisa, there's the proof that it's easy to mistake like sounding words. But in this case I will fix it, thanks for the heads up.

    So glad so many hear the voice of reason, I was sure that people would call me a racist too.

  • 5 - Sterfish

    Mar 26, 2006 at 3:01 am

    It's unfortunate that he lost his job over a slip of the tongue. I could understand it if the guy didn't understand what he had said, if he had joked about it, or wanted to say it with malicious intent. However, it seemed like he not only realized exactly what he said (and how bad it actually was) but he felt incredibly guilty about it. He should've had the chance to apologize on the air and keep his show.

  • 6 - Dave Nalle

    Mar 26, 2006 at 3:13 am

    I think that in this case 'racial epitaph' might be the correct phrasing, at least in terms of this guy's career.

    Dave

  • 7 - Dawn

    Mar 26, 2006 at 8:28 am

    I first heard this story on Rover's Morning Glory and he got a really mixed reaction from the audience, some people actually thought the guy was covering up some hidden racial agenda.

    And then after listening to the Roundtouble on Ed Gordon's show (I have diverse radio selections in my repertoire) I really wasn't sure what to think.

    After a fair amount of thinking about it and reading the story in various news outlets and not ONCE hearing that this guy has a track record for racism and in fact really digs the Secretary of State, it's just ignorant and single-minded to assume anything other than the fact it was an accident.

    Does anyone remember the guy who was fired for using the word "niggardly" in a closed meeting a few years back?

    What the heck happened to this country? I mean there is REAL racism in the world, we sure don't need to make shit it up to prove it.

  • 8 - Mary K. Williams

    Mar 29, 2006 at 8:58 am

    However, it seemed like he not only realized exactly what he said (and how bad it actually was) but he felt incredibly guilty about it. He should've had the chance to apologize on the air and keep his show

    Ster - Yeah, I agree.
    Dawn- good write up. Its so exhaustingly sad that certain methodologies are put into place for good reasons - originally. The whole PC movement was born of good intentions. Same with ACLU. But it all gets so easily fucked up. And then we are left with everyone being afraid to breathe the wrong way.

    Its a shame that we need laws to promote and protect what one would think would be common sense stuff.

    Robert Fulghum (All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten)got it right.
    (and no, this isn't spam : )

  • 9 - Mary K. Williams

    Mar 29, 2006 at 8:59 am

    However, it seemed like he not only realized exactly what he said (and how bad it actually was) but he felt incredibly guilty about it. He should've had the chance to apologize on the air and keep his show

    Ster - Yeah, I agree.
    Dawn- good write up. Its so exhaustingly sad that certain methodologies are put into place for good reasons - originally. The whole PC movement was born of good intentions. Same with ACLU. But it all gets so easily fucked up. And then we are left with everyone being afraid to breathe the wrong way.

    Its a shame that we need laws to promote and protect what one would think would be common sense stuff.

    Robert Fulghum (All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten)got it right.
    (and no, this isn't spam : )

  • 10 - Mary K. Williams

    Mar 29, 2006 at 9:10 am

    I bet it was WES MANTOOTH!

    Probably the ones from public news : )

  • 11 - Matthew Milam

    Mar 29, 2006 at 9:10 am

    I'm sorry to tell you guys this, but a racial slur is a racial slur. Asking blacks of all walks of life to simply laugh it off as a mistake is more like trying to have a Phil Collins concert in the ghetto, bullets will fly and hearts will bleed.

    Sometimes you gotta keep the anger to yourself, and that's a lesson that none of us ever learn. In his unforunate case, it ended up on national television.

  • 12 - Nancy

    Mar 29, 2006 at 9:22 am

    This reminds me for no reason except that its something blown out of proportion of the incident here in DC where an officer in city government got canned by Mayor Williams because he (the officer) said that the city's budget for some item or other was "niggardly", and the idiots he was talking to thought he used the N-word. They refused to back down even after someone showed them a dictionary.

  • 13 - Dawn

    Mar 29, 2006 at 9:39 am

    No Matthew, sometimes people just don't speak probably. Just like not every death is caused by murder, not every word uttered is meant to offend. The result might be the same, but the intent certainly isn't and we usually judge people based on their motives and intentions.

    That's we have things like manslaughter when someone commits an accident that results in death.

    I mean what's the point of saying a racial slur if you are only going to apologize profusely for afterwards? How has that helped anyone? It hasn't, so clearly it was an accident.

    The context is the key hear. The racial intent doesn't match the context in which the word was said. Why? Because there was not racial intent.

  • 14 - Rodney Welch

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:01 am

    This is the first I've heard of this and my gut reaction is: what kind of stuff was this guy on? "She's African-American, which would kind of be a big coon." Was he trying to say something else and it came out wrong, or what? Where did "coon" come from?

    What if he had said: "She's African-American, which would kind of be a big nigger. A big nigger. Oh my God. I am totally, totally, totally, totally, totally sorry for that."

    Would you look at him any differently? The offense is the same.

  • 15 - Mary K. Williams

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:17 am

    Rodney - from what I read, he meant to say 'coup'.

  • 16 - Rodney Welch

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:19 am

    Oh, I see. Well, that makes sense. I just couldn't figure out what he might have meant. If it's that kind of slip of the tongue, then I could forgive him.

  • 17 - Dawn

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:20 am

    There has been some speculation that he thinking of the words "boon" and "coup" - both appropriate for the sentence and context, and instead a conjunction of the two came out.

    Unfortunate, but hardly malicious.

  • 18 - Rodney Welch

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:29 am

    Ah! Now that makes even more sense. I can totally see that. And, the more I think about it, it would make no sense at all for him to call her "big," because she isn't.

    If it weren't so sad, this is a funny story, the idea of calling Condoleeza Rice that.

  • 19 - Mark Saleski

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:34 am

    i heard the replay. he was clearly appalled that those words came out of his mouth. completely sincere, especially considering how he'd been praising her earlier.

    for some reason, this is reminding me of that freudian slip joke where the guy is having dinner with his mother:

    "What I meant to say, was, 'Mother, would you please pass the salt,'" he explains, "but what actually came out was, 'You bitch, you ruined my entire life.'"

  • 20 - Nancy

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:37 am

    This was gross overreaction by the management. They could just have censured him; that would have been enough.

  • 21 - Dawn

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:38 am

    Wow, Mark, that's quite a slip.

    I sure hope that wasn't the case in this situation, as I would have to wonder about this guy's depth of anger in holding in so much racial resentment towards Ms. Rice.

    That word is not nice at all.

  • 22 - Dawn

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:41 am

    Ms. Rice has since accepted his apology, but followed it up with a cryptic message about birth defects and racial injustice.

    I have no idea what she was trying to impart come to think of it. But if someone called me something that derogatory, even by accident, I would be a bit befuddled too.

  • 23 - Matthew Milam

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:48 am

    Befuddled wouldn't be the only reaction you had if you were told the word often enough in your life.

  • 24 - Dawn

    Mar 29, 2006 at 10:51 am

    I can't imagine Condi Rice being called that in the last 40 years of her life. She's pretty highly regarded around the world I would think.

  • 25 - Don't call me Shirley

    Mar 29, 2006 at 11:48 am

    I don't chink he did it intentionally. It was a spick of the tongue. Oh shit.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 12, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs