O Unbiased News, Where Art Thou?

I try to read the paper every day. Yeah, I only read one, but the crap they put in it is all I can take for one day. I read some web news, like Drudge and Yahoo News. I watch TV; that’s where I get most of my news. I read a few different blogs – holy mackerel, there are some wing nuts out there in cyberspace! How do you pick and choose? How do you know what’s spin and what’s unwashed truth?

The problem as I’m seeing it right now though is where I should get my news. People I regularly converse with tell me all kinds of things about the news. “Fox is too conservative.” “CNN is too liberal.” “Bloggers don’t have a clue.” So where do you go to get just plain news? No spin, no bullshit; just plain news?

I try to watch the Sunday morning news shows on the networks; ABC has This Week, whose host, George Stephanopoulos, is the former press secretary for Clinton. If George can’t spin a story then a story can’t be spun! Think about all the crap he had to spin when he worked in the White House!

NBC has Meet the Press, whose host, Tim Russert, has worked for a couple of democrats in the past. Mr. Russert worked as a counselor for Mario Cuomo when he was governor of New York and for Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan as Chief of Staff.

NBC has another Sunday morning news show, but I have a hard time listening to Chris Matthews. He seems liking he’s yelling at the world most of the time. I live with three women — I don’t need anyone else yelling at me, so no Hardball for me! I think he might have a little bit of a saliva problem, too.

Besides, Matthews worked for Carter. I was in the military when Carter was president. Did you know that when Carter was president, China called the United States a paper tiger? I’d rather watch Saturday Night Live impersonate him anyway — a lot more fun.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for andy-marsh

Article Author: Andy Marsh

Andy is a 20 year retired navy vet living in Virginia Beach. He's not a writer, just a blogger.

Visit Andy Marsh's author pageAndy Marsh's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Michael J. West

    Jun 28, 2006 at 5:29 pm

    Perhaps it's in your perception?

    Study after study of journalism, mass media, and its audiences has practically made this a law among communication scholars:

    A person of strong political opinion, regardless of the orientation of that opinion, will, when acting as an audience for major news media, perceive that news media as biased in the opposite direction of the person's political views.

    Which means that no matter what your opinions are, you'll think the media's biased against you. If you're looking for something that doesn't seem biased, you have to have no political opinion whatsoever.

  • 2 - gonzo marx

    Jun 28, 2006 at 6:40 pm

    oh c'mon Andy...

    you know you get it from here...

    heh

    me? i go fer a mix, Lou Dobbs then Hardball if nothing else is on at 8 , some Keith Olberman, a healthy mix of Google news links and right here at BC

    but the real Answer is...yes Andy, you have to figure this shit out for yourself...the Media are in it to make money, so there Interest in getting the whole unbiased Story out there is colored by financial concerns at the least...and in some cases, partisan axrd to grind at worst

    use that grey matter and make up yer own Mind

    but you knew that i would say that

    Excelsior?

  • 3 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 28, 2006 at 6:48 pm

    thanks gonzo...as always...you really are worse than those nuns ya know!

  • 4 - gonzo marx

    Jun 28, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    why Andy..that's the finest Compliment i've had since a troll remark a few months ago...

    i'm Honored

    Excelsior?

  • 5 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 28, 2006 at 6:53 pm

    hey, I'm just glad you don't have a ruler handy!

  • 6 - lori

    Jun 28, 2006 at 9:07 pm

    Ruler?

    You boys gonna be measuring something?

  • 7 - JR

    Jun 28, 2006 at 9:49 pm

    Lou Dobbs is blatantly biased on a few issues that he's obsessed with. However, for the most part he avoids those stupid Hollywood-celebrity-on-trial-for-removing-the-
    feeding-tube-of-a-trapped-coal-miner stories. You get news on issues that might actually impact your life and some slightly-more-informed-than-average analysis. Dobbs would have leaned toward conservative back before the term was hijacked by religious nuts and lobby capitalists.

    The other option is PBS's News Hour, but I find it about as enticing as a protein bar. Pity I didn't grow up before TV could rot my brain. Sigh.

    But that's the thing about totally unbiased news: it's boring. The bias gives you a point of reference from which to follow a narrative. Without that it seems like a pointless recitation of meaningless facts.

  • 8 - JustOneMan

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:11 am

    Think about it....nobody was watching Lou Dobbs until he took a stand became a vocal anti-illegal immigration spoke person...unlike many of the CNN & MSNBC types who pretent they are being nonbiased in their biased reporting..he is no longer hiding behind a "story"

    This is the reason that FOX has grown and Dan Blather has become a living fossil....

  • 9 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 6:56 am

    It sounds like I'm stuck yelling at the TV. Either yelling in agreement or yelling in dissent, but still yelling.

    The kinds of stuf I'm talking about are things like this latest issue with the NYT. Depending on what news program you watch this was either really really bad or no big deal...I haven't seen one news show that put it somewhere in the middle.

  • 10 - Clavos

    Jun 29, 2006 at 9:18 am

    ...I haven't seen one news show that put it somewhere in the middle.

    Probably 'cause "in the middle" doesn't sell a hell of a lot of airtime (or papers).

  • 11 - gonzo marx

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:23 pm

    as for something in the "middle"

    it seems SCOTUS gave the Administration a figurative bloody nose today when it ruled that the WH had overstepped it's bounds concerning detainees in GITMO...

    from Bloomberg news... a clear cut case of checks and balances kicking in... Roberts recused himself cuz he had ruled on a lower court... so the only dissent was from Scalia and Thomas (suprise) with Thomas making an unprecedented move by reading from his dissent, basicly saying that the WH should have carte blanche in wartime...

    luckily the Majority did not agree, and stated that the proposed military tribunals violated both the Geneva Conventions(which were ruled applicable, that's Important) as well as a violation of the UCMJ (uniformed code of military justice, the laws from which our military operates...also important precedent)

    so much for a bunch of Gonzalez's legal Opinions on exactly these matters

    can't wait to see how the rulings go on other of Gonzalez's opinions...like torture, or extrodinairy renditions...

    time wounds all heels

    Excelsior?

  • 12 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:28 pm

    I'm gonna try not to say this to loud...but I watched FNC last night...

    Wesley Clark was on O'Reilly...his idea for the GITMO detainees is for an international tribunal...let the rest of the world get involved with these terrorists...like he said...if he's an enemy of the US...he's an enemy of every other democracy in the world...

    As O'Reilly would say...what say you?

  • 13 - gonzo marx

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    i say, if you watch O'Reilly, then i must question your rational ability and sanity

    if you take him for an entertainment source, and toss out his blatant factual errors, partisan bias, and outright fabrications...but just enjoy him for a belly laugh ...then fine

    but you get about the same amount of hard news from Jon Stewart (which is to say, almost none) as you do from O'Reilly...so taking him even remotely seriously as any kind of "journalist" besides a muckraking partisan mudslinger is beyond the pale of Reason

    your mileage may vary

    Excelsior?

  • 14 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    but then again...you like Olberman...who seems to spend more time slamming O'Reilly than reporting news...but he's not biased?

    I watched to hear what Clark had to say...after that they were talking about Jolie and Pitt...like I give a fuck about them!

  • 15 - chantal stone

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:53 pm

    any so-called journalsit who spend an iota of airtime on jolie and pitt should no longer consider themselves to be in the realm of serious news, imo.

    gimme a break

  • 16 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    that's why I turned it off! I mean. come on...it was either that...or watch the Sox beat up on the Mets!

  • 17 - gonzo marx

    Jun 29, 2006 at 1:02 pm

    for the Record, Andy..Olberman is in the same entertainment category as the Daily Show

    some info, but not a serious news program

    Excelsior?

  • 18 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    gonzo - I honestly didn't know that! I thought he was supposed to be serious reporting...obviously, I've never watched or I'd know this...my apologies master...

  • 19 - Clavos

    Jun 29, 2006 at 1:07 pm

    Andy...Andy...Andy,

    Never EVER feed the ego of someone who calls himself Gonzo...talk about opening Pandora's Box!! :>)

  • 20 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 29, 2006 at 1:10 pm

    Clavos - gonzo and I go back a ways on BC..he actually is a pretty smart guy...in spite of his nom de plume!

    He has pointed me to the path many times...I don't always follow...sometimes it's kinda scary...but he has shown the way.

  • 21 - MCH

    Jun 29, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    Besides that, us squids gotta stick together...

  • 22 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 30, 2006 at 9:03 am

    You know, I woulda thought that too...but it don't always seem to be the way...

  • 23 - MCH

    Jun 30, 2006 at 9:57 am

    Best news programs I ever watched were Chevy Chase, Jane Curtain, Dan Ackroyd and Gilda Radner on SNL...

  • 24 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 30, 2006 at 10:02 am

    The first time I heard Dan Akroyd say "Jane, you ingonrant slut" was the first time I was in CA...I thought...I heard CA was a little different the Jersey! I'd never seen SNL before that...

  • 25 - MCH

    Jun 30, 2006 at 10:05 am

    Hey Andy...did you get a chance to see that match between Kendrick and Nadal yesterday? Wow, almost one of the biggest upsets in Wimbledon history...

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs