Nicole Kidman Still Carries a Torch for Tom Cruise, But Why?

According to an interview in the June issue of Lady's Home Journal, Oscar winning actress (The Hours) Nicole Kidman still "loves" her ex-husband Tom Cruise.

Nicole "He was huge; still is. To me, he was just Tom, but to everybody else, he is huge. But he was lovely to me. And I loved him. I still love him."

What does she mean by huge anyway? He's a short, little man. Does she mean he's a huge star? A huge jerk? A huge pain in the ass? Or does she mean he's huge in the pants? Were I interviewing Nicole, I would have pressed for more detail on that statement.

Honestly, when I first read her statement, I was both disturbed and a little sobby. How many of us hold a small torch for a former love? It's not uncommon to miss someone you once shared your life with, even someone who's kind of a freak like Tom Cruise.

Eyes Tom and Nicole were the golden couple, long before JenBrad, Brangelina, Bennifer, and so on and so forth. I was sad to hear of the breakup of their ten-year marriage, but not surprised. Ten years is almost an eternity by Hollywood standards.

Then again, did anyone see Eyes Wide Shut? They were kind of a black hole of sexual chemistry.

Tom and Nicole were always an odd couple: on one side there's the beautiful, long, willowy, cultured, and demure Nicole Kidman; on the other there's the half-cocked, squat, defiantly handsome knucklehead Tom Cruise.

I know it's not really fair to judge a relationship from the outside looking in, but I am not really fair, so indulge me:

I have no doubt that Tom Cruise can be charming, sweet and larger than life; but what the almost 6-foot, former model from down-under saw in him is beyond me.

Strangely, even Nicole seemed to think her life with Tom was doomed, although she clearly couldn't put a finger on what it was exactly. "I always knew the rug was going to be taken out from underneath me at some stage ... I didn't think it was going to happen in the way it happened ... I knew I was going to get hit with something. But I think a divorce, and the demise of what your family is, is a little death in itself."

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dawn-olsen

Article Author: Dawn Olsen

Dawn Olsen is a veteran blogger who proudly supports the guy who publishes this awesome site. When not engaging in neologistical pursuits, she writes about popular culture, Hollywood and those fanciful creatures called "celebrities" at Glosslip.com. …

Visit Dawn Olsen's author pageDawn Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Eyes Wide Shut (R-Rated Edition) Eyes Wide Shut (R-Rated Edition)

    A wifes admission of unfulfilled sexual longings plunges her husband into an erotic odyssey that could destroy his marriage and perhaps even ensnare him in a lurid murder mystery. Studio: Warner Home ...

  • The Hours The Hours
  • Tom Cruise Action Pack (Top Gun -Widescreen Special Edition/Days of Thunder/Mission Impossible) Tom Cruise Action Pack (Top Gun -Widescreen Special Edition/Days of...
  • Livin' Right Now Livin' Right Now
  • Be Here Be Here
  • Golden Road Golden Road

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    I just noticed that when juxtaposed together like that, Keith and I have the same hair cut.

    Same stylist?

  • 2 - Mark Saleski

    May 10, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    it might just be me & my browser, but i swear that i can see the "lust vibes" moving from dawn's pic over to urban's.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 2:27 pm

    for completely different reasons, had to ax that last Keith pic - no room.

    Nice job, Dawn!

  • 4 - DJRadiohead

    May 10, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    Tom Cruise: bad for film, psychiatry, normalcy, pregnancy. Great for BCRadio.

  • 5 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 3:23 pm

    DJR, I am always thinking of you when I write these stories. Ever present in my mind you are - but of course, I have a lot of room up there :)

  • 6 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    unless you're thinking about Keith Urban

  • 7 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Yeah, Keith does own a small corner in my brain!

    Mark's right, my picture was attempting to molest poor Keith's, good thing Eric removed it or we might have multiplied into little bloglettes.

  • 8 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 3:44 pm

    but that wasn't WHY I removed it, of course

  • 9 - Peter Forrester

    May 10, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    It's funny that personal attacks are not allowed when posting a response. But you happily attacked someone you've never even met (Tom Cruise) by calling him a freak. Will you even post this?

  • 10 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 4:00 pm

    Are you a Charlie Sheen fan too Peter?

  • 11 - DJRadiohead

    May 10, 2006 at 4:04 pm

    Peter, I can understand how a person might read this and conclude Dawn is attacking Cruise on a personal level. That said, I think you can also see this as a humorous, entertaining bit of analysis of things Nicole Kidman said and things Tom Cruise did. She is not alone in thinking that Cruise is behaving in a bizarre way. Calling him a "freak" in that context doesn't seem so awful to me.

  • 12 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 4:07 pm

    Peter is a Scientologist

  • 13 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 4:08 pm

    also, to be precise, she called him a "sort of freak," which is softened considerably

  • 14 - NR Davis

    May 10, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    Does the comment policy govern articles? That doesn't make sense.

  • 15 - Eric Olsen

    May 10, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    and then there's that

  • 16 - Eric Berlin

    May 10, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    "Kind of a freak" is so inside the bounds as a reference to a very public figure that it's... freaky.

    Great piece, Dawn !

  • 17 - Dorothy Lenz

    May 10, 2006 at 7:41 pm

    Dear Dawn,
    I personally like Tom Cruise and I like Nicole Kidman. I don't feel I need to criticize either. I think both of them are great. There are better things to put your attention on that really do handling in life. . . . poverty, war, sickness, revenge, hatred, etc. Why don't we get off the "Cruise is bad" "Nicole is crazy for loving him" kick, and do something constructive for the world?
    Dorothy Lenz
    [Personal contact info deleted]

  • 18 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 7:42 pm

    Honestly, I said lots of nice things about Tom too, I was fair and balanced and ultimately generous.

    I also just happen to think pretty highly of Nicole Kidman. I didn't even mention the positive and kind work she is doing for UNIFEM, an organization that fights for women's rights around the world.

    She, unlike Tom, is a class act A-lister!

    PS - Thanks Eric and Eric!!

  • 19 - Dawn

    May 10, 2006 at 7:44 pm

    Dorothy, duly noted. But I am the resident celeb gossip person around here, I am just doing my job, while simultaneously enjoying it.

    PS. Future reference, don't include personal info about yourself on the web. I will see about having that edited for you.

  • 20 - Eric Berlin

    May 10, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    Dorothy, if Dawn chooses to spend her time fulfilling herself via writing and entertaining an audience in an online medium, is that such a bad thing?

  • 21 - NR Davis

    May 10, 2006 at 8:14 pm

    Trust me; you don't want her running loose on the streets. ;)

  • 22 - Paula

    May 10, 2006 at 8:33 pm

    This has got to be one of THE BEST articles I have read in forever!! I found great humor in it. I have always liked Nicole AND Tom and the way I read it....there was no bashing. It was all TRUE! I bet Tom laughs at himself daily. As for Keith....one of the most beautiful creatures on Earth. Inside and out. Keith and Nicole are very lucky indeed!

  • 23 - NR Davis

    May 10, 2006 at 8:54 pm

    I have my doubts that Tom Cruise is capable of laughing at himself. He knows the truth. He knows the facts. You don't.

    (lol)

    Gosh, I hate to stir the gossip pot, but is anyone hearing that an "amicable separation" may be on the agenda? I've read (via Ted Casablanca) that people thisclose to TC say the lovey-dovey bit is all for show. Team Cruise, of course, denies, denies, denies the naysaying and insists a wedding will come soon (rumored date: July 1, which is my anniversary too, dammit; I feel like Brooke Shields). Which story will turn out to be the real one? Will Tom jump on more upholstered furniture? Will the glazed look ever leave Katie's eyes? And what about Baby Suri? Find out more... as the stomach turns.

  • 24 - Victor Plenty

    May 10, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Nicole didn't say she's still in love with Tom, only that she still loves him. From the context it isn't clear what sort of love she means.

    Moving slowly on a new relationship might not mean she's carrying a torch. It might merely mean she's trying to make sure her next marriage lasts longer than her last one.

    If it weren't for Nicole's signature on the non-disclosure agreement that's surely on file with Cruise's lawyers, maybe she would talk about her sincere hope that one day he will find, settle down with, and perhaps even marry, the man of his dreams.

  • 25 - Eric Berlin

    May 10, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    I think if Tom separates after the kid is born he'll be one step closer to Michael Jackson-land.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 12, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs