Never again

I hope.

On the eve of the 10th anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda, I think it would be a good idea to understand what happened that ignited the attacks and what didn't happen that allowed them to go on to such an obscene extent. So I'm directing interested folks to one of the two best sources of local African news and opinions (thereby giving up one of the unique elements of my blog).

APPROACHING THE HEART OF A RAGING FIRE
Firoze Manji, Fahamu
This 150th issue of Pambazuka News is dedicated to the international mobilization on Remembering Rwanda. This marks the 10th anniversary of a human catastrophe of gigantic proportions that led to the massacre of nearly a million people in Rwanda in the space of a few months. It was an event that was made all the more shameful for the criminal negligence of the international community, in Africa and beyond, to intervene - despite their full knowledge of what was happening. 1994 marked a tragedy that unfolded in Rwanda whose repercussions continue to be felt throughout the Great Lakes Region.

The focus on Rwanda is important not only as an act of solidarity with the survivors of the genocide. It should also be a reminder of the unfolding tragedy in the Great Lakes, particularly in the DRC, when many millions more have been and are being massacred.

Rwanda has been, as Mahmood Mamdani says in 'When Victims Become Killers', the “epicentre of the wider crisis in the African Great Lakes. Tied together by the thread of a common colonial legacy - one that politicized indigeneity as a basis for rights - the region has little choice but to address the Rwandan dilemma, if only to address its own dilemma. ... [This] will require a regional approach through a regional agenda that approaches the centre as firefighters would approach the heart of a raging fire, from outside in.”

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 05, 2004 at 5:22 pm

    880K is a vast number of people, unspeakable. Thanks for the reminder P6. Is there a specific lesson to be learned from what happened there? How can the "never again" hope be most likely made real? I just don't know all that much about it.

  • 2 - P6

    Apr 06, 2004 at 12:18 pm

    So far the only lesson I've seen is it takes one hell of a lot of death and misery to get the world to react to an African problem...far more than it takes anywhere else in the world.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:12 pm

    And why would that be? Is it racial, geographic, cultural, economic?

  • 4 - Ms. Tek

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:18 pm

    Africans are just a bunch of bush, monkey eating, violent, topless, bone in the the nose, stupid people with nothing that is of any used to the western world...

    You know... a bunch of "ubangy bang-bang, ooga mooga".

    Unless they are sitting on an oil field or diamond mine.

    The Africans gave the world AIDS.

  • 5 - Joe

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:20 pm

    Ohfercryinoutloud! There you go about Bush...again!

  • 6 - Ms. Tek

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:21 pm

    Um... no...

    re-read. Bush- in the wilds, I.e. BUSHES.

  • 7 - David Flanagan

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:22 pm

    Ms. Tek,

    How are your comments helpful?

    David

  • 8 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:24 pm

    My guess is that they were satirical.

  • 9 - Joe

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:25 pm

    Yeah, I was just kidding. I knew what you meant.

  • 10 - Ms. Tek

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:25 pm

    David,

    How are yours? Are about to quote false facts again and then run away from the issue when you are shown six ways from Sunday that you are falsifying information?

    Want to revisit "CLINTON'S FREE SPEECH ZONES" again?

    Thanks,

    Ms.Tek

  • 11 - Ms. Tek

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:31 pm

    Well Eric...

    What do you think? Why do you think that no one stepped in? You know what I think. I can't see how anyone can come to another, logical, conclusion... esp considering recent actions.

    Africans are not important. Genocide, mass rapes, mass gaves, hunger and starvation is okay if you are African. Unless you are an African sitting on diamonds or Oil. Otherwise, to hell with ya!

  • 12 - apparent bad guy

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:36 pm

    I agree with Ms. Tek, but for an entirely different reason.

  • 13 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:48 pm

    and that reason is??...

  • 14 - P6

    Apr 06, 2004 at 1:49 pm

    Eric:

    Pressed to speculate, I'd say it's cultural. In colonial times, Africa was "developed" as a source of raw material and as a market. Not as a producer. Not as partner or participant.

    There IS a club of nations, and very few African nations have membership.

    I'll ignore the rest of the…discussion here.

  • 15 - JR

    Apr 06, 2004 at 2:16 pm

    P6, your explanation makes it sound more like economics, as does Ms. Tek's.

  • 16 - P6

    Apr 06, 2004 at 3:42 pm

    I prefer dealing with accessible problems. And racism (which I suspect was the expected reason) is a side effect of economic decisions that has taken on a rather monstrous life of its own. Healing the damage caused by colonial policies falls into the category of international public goods-something that will benefit everyone, but the benefit is so long term no capitalist worth his salt will take it on.

    Ms Tek, whose meaning I initially missed because this isn't a topic where I flex my sense of humor, seems to be saying economics overrides racism, not that racism isn't in the mix.

  • 17 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2004 at 4:45 pm

    Very interesting, thanks. I get the sense that underlying decisions regarding intervention - anywhere - is an economic-type evaluation that is applied to social/political/military questions: ie, "will our time, money, lives 'spent' here yield a tangible result?" The closer to a perceived state of "chaos," the less enthusiasm for intervention. And Africa, in general, is perceived as quite chaotic.

  • 18 - Ms. Tek

    Apr 06, 2004 at 4:46 pm

    Economics will always override everything. Geed is one of the seven deadly sins. If there is a buck to be made, someone will do whatever they can to make that buck. Sometimes being self serving will override prejudices. In the end, green is always good, no matter where it came from or how it was obtained.

  • 19 - P6

    Apr 06, 2004 at 5:28 pm

    I just (and I mean just) read an editorial in the NY Times on this that, among other issues raised, suggests the problem had semantic roots; how do you genocide using machete? And much like Israelis are soldiers while Palestinians are "gun men," genocide is a civilized institution—outside "civilization" it's just barbarism.

    Other things were raised, like being close enough to watch the action thru binoculars and crowding around the TV to watch the news reports—the proverbial "film at 11"—and waking up 100 days later realizing the 8000 people per day were killed and EVERYONE LEFT ALIVE was complicit.

    No good guys here. Just a lot of lessons to be learned.

    I could almost wish for Africa's absorption into a Western system so that there are better ways of exercising power that leaping immediately to the last resort. If it weren't for the FACT that prudent business judgement requires taking advantage whenever possible.

  • 20 - P6

    Apr 06, 2004 at 5:35 pm

    Ms. Tek:

    In the end, green is always good, no matter where it came from or how it was obtained.


    That is the whole idea behind money—that it's been raised to an almost religious level is…unfortunate.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 26, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs