Michael Moore - THE HUGEST TOOL

Well, I guess I should have predicted it, Michael Moore is the bigger political "tool." And that is meant in the most unflattering context. With the recent Bill O'Reilly bashing, I would have thought is would be closer than 182 to 100, but I think the fact that Michael Moore's veracity is questionable, just being a big-mouthed jerk wasn't enough to put Bill over the top.

Thanks again for participating and please be sure to cast your vote in the next poll - "Taste Great, Less Filling - Pick the best beer.

Because without such riveting controversy, then we would all be forced to read Lileks.

Just kidding, everyone loves Lileks.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dawn-olsen

Article Author: Dawn Olsen

Dawn Olsen is a veteran blogger who proudly supports the guy who publishes this awesome site. When not engaging in neologistical pursuits, she writes about popular culture, Hollywood and those fanciful creatures called "celebrities" at Glosslip.com. …

Visit Dawn Olsen's author pageDawn Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Bowling for Columbine Bowling for Columbine

    Acclaimed filmmaker Michael Moore (Roger & Me) takes aim at America's love affair with guns and violence in this Oscar(r)-winning* film that "demands attention" (People)! Mixing riveting footage, ...

  • Who's Looking Out for You? Who's Looking Out for You?

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 1:50 am

    Hmm. I guess BC is less liberal than I thought. Very disappointed. Oh, well.

  • 2 - Michael Croft

    Oct 01, 2003 at 2:20 am

    Yep, says more about us than about either of them.

  • 3 - Al Barger

    Oct 01, 2003 at 5:03 am

    Natalie, it's not just a partisan question, where the liberals vote that the conservative is the tool. Some would vote that way, but that's not the question. There are worser Republicans and relatively more trustworthy liberals.

    For one thing, O'Reilly is more honest than Moore. Also, Moore is absolutely partisan to liberals and Democrats- a tool- in a way that O'Reilly is not to the other side.

    Jebus Criminy, how bad do you have to be to rate worse than Bill O'Reilly? Yowsa.

  • 4 - Dawn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 8:08 am

    Natalie,

    I bet a lot of people don't watch Bill O'Reilly and also read BC, so they aren't aware of what an ass he is, but Michael Moore made such a HUGE ass out of himself last year at the Oscar's and lots of people watched that.

    Notoriety has its advantages.

    Just my guess anyway.

  • 5 - Chris Arabia

    Oct 01, 2003 at 9:07 am

    Michael Moore is so full of hate--after 9/11 one of his chief gripes was that they hit "people who didn't vote for Bush" (a statement so venomous I won't even bother to discuss its concurrent idiocy).

    I used to watch O'Reilly fairly often back in 99-00, and I read his first book, and sorry, he is not a lockstep conservative. That is to say nothing of his proclivities.

    The question as posed was unlikely to produce any other result. The bigger tool? That would be the guy who evidently would not have had as much quarrel with an al-Qaeda attack on Salt Lake City. On that basis, any disappointment that people reject Moore's hatred is a bit disppointing.

    O'Reilly would be the first to admit that he can be a bit of a pompus buffoon (at least he used to be self-deprecating on the air, as he was when a lefty friend of mine dragged me to see him at Harvard).

  • 6 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 9:42 am

    True, O'Reilly is not a lockstep conservative. And if Moore made that statement, I would bet that it was in jest as much as it was in terribly poor taste. Is Moore being a bigger hater than O'Reilly? I doubt that.

    O’Reilly on Al Franken:

    “What this guy writes and says does not matter to me, other than…he insulted me in a forum where I was at a decided disadvantage, you know, he went over his time limit. It was very, very sneaky, and you know, as I said at the top of the broadcast, somebody calls you a liar to your face, you don't just laugh that off. That's an insult. In the Old West, that woulda got you shot. See in the Old West, and I woulda loved to have been in the Old West, Al and I woulda just had a little, uh, a little shootout. You know? We woulda went out, on Wilshire Avenue, and uh, six shooters, now he's a much smaller target than I am, about four foot eleven, but he's wider, and it woulda been you know, Clint Eastwood time. I woulda had the cheroot, the serape, woulda given my squint, and I woulda put a bullet right between his head. Woulda been wrong, woulda been wrong, but it was the Old West, and I would not have known any better, so I wouldn't have been held accountable because I would not have known any--now I do, now in 2003 that would have been wrong.”

  • 7 - Phillip Winn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 9:53 am

    I haven't watched O'Reilly in years, so I can't say anything about his recent views, but around the time of his first book, he definitely wasn't a typical conservative or lock-step Republican. Back then, at least, he could honestly claim to hold moderate views. Since then, I don't know. He bores me.

    But when the survey said "biggest tool," I thought to myself that O'Reilly is a mostly independent thinker who happens to be too obnoxious to watch but occasionally surprises, while Moore's views on every issue can be easily predicted. So biggest tool might suggest Moore, but I still voted for O'Reilly.

    Why? Because I don't care in the slightest about Moore, while O'Reilly showed some promise before descending into the madness of idiocy he is in now. What a disappointment.

    Hey, Bill, watch out for Ampersand!

  • 8 - Phillip WInn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 9:58 am

    Natalie, your comment made me laugh out loud! I am always amazed at my own blind spots on those rare occasions when they are pointed out to me, and I am fascinated to see them in others. I have long believed that our own views on any issue can be easily determined by which brand of extremism offends us more.

    Me, I see O'Reilly's comment as somewhat funny, and I'm not really offended by it. I'm not a pacifist, though, and I have to admit that on those rare occasions I find myself in rush-hour traffic (as I was last night), I've had thoughts far more dire than the idea that some disputes are best settled with a six-gun. ;-)

    However, I don't think it is a matter of opinion to say that Moore's comments were not in jest at all. He made them with no humor, and defended them with no humor. I might be less inclined to give Moore the benefit of the doubt (see earlier in this comment), but removed all doubt with his follow-up comments in this case anyway.

  • 9 - Chris Arabia

    Oct 01, 2003 at 9:59 am

    that old west thing is pretty moronic, yes, and i dont defend it. it is less indefensible than moore's statement, though, because franken was directly and personally antagonizing bill, the language was conditional, and he says within the statement that it is wrong.

    moore's statement in jest? considering that it came immediately after 9/11, i doubt it was in jest. emotional response, probably, but those are pretty perverse emotions.

    neither dude has aristotle nervously clutching his legacy, ah reckon.

  • 10 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 10:50 am

    lol

  • 11 - Phillip Winn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:03 am

    On the best beer poll, I'm surprised not to see Guinness as a choice for import. 'Tis my second favorite import, and isn't even an option!

    Oh well, I only get one vote anyway.

  • 12 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:07 am

    I suspect the spouse would've voted for Guinness, as well. When I was pregnant, SU continually tried to get me to drink it because of its purported nutritional qualities. I demurred, of course. I'm not a drinker, anyway, but Guinness is one of the few beers I can tolerate. My vote, however, went to Red Stripe. Hooray, beer!

  • 13 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:08 am

    Oh, yes, and absolutely the "tool" poll tells us more about the voters than about the subject of the vote.

  • 14 - Eric Olsen

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:08 am

    That's why they are the top tools. I voted for Moore because he is more dangerous than O'Reilly. A lot of people, especially outside the country, really like Moore, think he's funny, and are influenced by him as a result. O'Reilly is just a blowhard, who even supporters think is a jerk. Also, Moore is considered to be an artiste by many - poor fools.

  • 15 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:14 am

    Mike is dangerous. Dangerous like Peter Tosh: ready to crush -- nonviolently, of course -- the shitstem. That's a good kind of dangerous, in my book.

  • 16 - andy

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:16 am

    Maybe Guiness isn't on there because it's stoudt. But where's the Harp?

  • 17 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:18 am

    Yes, and Bass (though it is ale).

  • 18 - Dawn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:24 am

    People, I am only allowed ten choices per poll, damn, I knew this was gonna be a problem.

    Sorry I screwed up, but I do love Harp - and Natalie, Red Stripe is on there just for you!

  • 19 - Chris Arabia

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:24 am

    You omitted St. Ides and Baltika.

    Marbles in hand, I'm going home.

  • 20 - Natalie Davis

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:25 am

    Woo hoo! Another reason why I love that woman.

  • 21 - BRICKLAYER

    Oct 01, 2003 at 11:49 am

    Has to be Newcastle Brown Ale-It makes me feel all funny inside.

  • 22 - The Theory

    Oct 01, 2003 at 12:41 pm

    this poll is discriminating to those of us who are under 21 and law abiding...

  • 23 - Eric Olsen

    Oct 01, 2003 at 12:55 pm

    I like Newcastle a lot too, but how can you vote against Anchor Steam?

  • 24 - Taloran

    Oct 01, 2003 at 1:09 pm

    Sierra Nevada Pale Ale
    Rogue Dead Guy Ale
    Samuel Smith's Oatmeal Stout
    Mackesson Triple Stout
    Wolf Tongue Brewery's Mr. Hoppy (alas, they're out of business.)
    Ayinger Celebrator Doppelbock
    Paulaner Oktoberfest
    Rogue Smoke
    Alaskan Amber

  • 25 - Phillip Winn

    Oct 01, 2003 at 2:09 pm

    For the record, I quite enjoy all ten of the choices on the Import/Microbrew list, and all four of Taloran's list that I've actually had. I recognize that Dawn only has ten choices, and Dawn, why is it a problem that the poll is generating conversation?

    Still, Dos Equis and Sapporo over Guinness? You've got to be kidding! ;-)

    Eric, Anchor Steam is excellent. I haven't had any in a few years, but it might be in my top three or four. Newcastle is my current #1, though.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 28, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs