MARCON Day 3: In Space, Can Anybody Hear You Pray?

Every year, for the last 44 years, Memorial Day Weekend is a big deal as sci-fi, fantasy, and otherwise "interesting" folks converge in the Central Ohio Convention Center in Columbus, Ohio. MARCON, or Multiple Alternative Reality Convention, is a gathering for fans, readers, writers, and anybody who is interested in comics, sci-fi, and fantasy. The three-day event is one of the most enjoyable events I go to in a year, but it is also one of the strangest. Let the tale end:

It's the last day of MARCON and my head is spinning. Too many drinks in the wee hours of the morning at room parties will do that to you. For those of you who don't know, room parties are parties that are forced into private hotel rooms because they get out of hand with either too much drinking or too much sexual play, though never both at the same time. Mine was the drinking kind.

Looking over at my clock, I notice that it's already 9:30 in the morning; I have a panel at 10 so this is a big issue. Jump out of bed, jump into the shower, and run to my car. A quick drive, along with the proper tipping and payment for valet parking, and I am in the convention center. Woot, I make it on time.

I head to Madison and look around; there is almost nobody there. This seems to be what happens on Sundays: everybody who is attending the con is either hung over, still asleep, or taking down the displays. What is officially a three-day con is more or less a two-day convention for most people. This disappoints me; not only am I on two Sunday panels, but I usually think that Sunday panels are the best panels of the convention. Oh well.

So I migrate to Madison and meet up with Madame Heaphy as we are about to start our panel. Low and behold, there is only one person there, a teacher-in-training who is focusing on science and math. Well, our panel is about teaching science fiction (even though I am only 21 I have taught scifi to high schoolers and studied it at many levels). So we'll do a one-on-one, but that's perfectly fine. Instead of the lecture and slide show we have planned, we sit down and simply ask him to tell us the subjects he must cover.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - STM

    May 28, 2009 at 12:36 am

    I saw the British version of Life on Mars first, on an Australian free-to-air TV channel.

    Now I'm watching the American version on cable Down Under. Some great casting in both.

    They're both really good.

    The best bit is that as both are set in the decade fashion forgot (the 70s), the clothes and hairstyles are remarkably similar on both sides of the pond.

    That is: bad. I know how bad, because I lived it.

    However, there's a bit of a nod to London's slightly trendier Carnaby St fashions in the British version.

    One thing that caught my eye: The flared pants ... but geez, were they really the width of the platforms at Grand Central Station (or Victoria station)?

    Shocking and cringeworthy if true. Did we really wear that stuff???

    Either way, I spent time in the US and the UK in that era, and I'm glad we all moved on (although the 80s were a worry too).

    We really did have some fun, though.

  • 2 - Dave Nalle

    May 28, 2009 at 12:45 am

    The ending of the American version of LoM is far inferior to the more ambiguous British ending. Or non-ending. Have you seen Ashes to Ashes?

    Dave

  • 3 - Christopher Rose

    May 28, 2009 at 2:14 am

    Stan, are you kidding? The 70s and 80s were two of the three best decades of the 20th Century in almost every way imaginable!

  • 4 - Robert M. Barga

    May 28, 2009 at 5:23 am

    @stm that is my favorite part of the show, the fact that they copied all of that over in terms of cars, fashion, and attitude

  • 5 - Robert M. Barga

    May 28, 2009 at 5:24 am

    @dave
    i actually liked the american one better, as it was rushed but also clear that it was similar to all of their intent

  • 6 - roger nowosielski

    May 28, 2009 at 6:29 am

    #3,

    Right. We had no idea of the good times ahead.

  • 7 - Dave Nalle

    May 28, 2009 at 6:29 am

    Come on, you've got to admit the ending on the US version was pretty cheesy.

    Dave

  • 8 - Dave Nalle

    May 28, 2009 at 6:33 am

    BTW, Robert, as a past frequent SF and gaming convention panelist and participant I enjoyed your article. Maybe I'll stop by Armadillocon this year.

    I found your description of the prayer meeting an interesting contrast to our state GOP convention where they had a designated prayer room which was entirely empty for the duration of the event.

    Dave

  • 9 - Bliffle

    May 28, 2009 at 8:30 am

    I saw a couple episodes of LoM and thought it was fun, but didn't see the finale.

    STM: you saw the Brit version on FTA? I didn't know there was anything good on FTA. For the summer I'm sitting up in the mountains, actually in an alpine valley, where OTA reception is spotty, but there's a dish and a cable terminated in an F connector, so I was thinking of hooking up an FTA receiver. What deterred me was that FTA has the rep of being all religious stuff. But if there's something better I'll give it a try.

  • 10 - Dr Dreadful

    May 28, 2009 at 10:46 am

    When my wife and I moved into our first apartment we were donated an extremely hefty and ancient TV with a ropy old antenna that could only pick up Univision (which appears to broadcast using a large battery of thermonuclear reactors and can be picked up inside mountains and at the bottom of the Marianas Trench) and the God Channel.

    There's nothing on American TV anyway so we weren't missing much! ;-)

  • 11 - Robert M. Barga

    May 28, 2009 at 11:33 am

    @7 actually, i thought it was rushed but was forshadowed throughout the rest of the show
    the show was based on a davide Bowie song, so why not based the american one on another?

  • 12 - Robert M. Barga

    May 28, 2009 at 11:35 am

    @8 if you liked them, then why not comment in those ones as well
    I am planning on doing this next year, and will be sending PR things to local conventions hopefully to do this at more throughout this year. I look forward to seeing you around those articles too

  • 13 - Bliffle

    May 28, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Actually, I'm getting a good PBS feed on KTEH 54 which has 4 subchannels. But the only commercial station is KSTS 48 which is Telemundo.

    If I thought that FTA had anything I'd get a receiver, but maybe I will anyhow.

  • 14 - Dr Dreadful

    May 28, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    Bliff,

    PBS is probably all you need, really!

  • 15 - STM

    May 29, 2009 at 12:06 am

    Doc: "Stan, are you kidding? The 70s and 80s were two of the three best decades of the 20th Century in almost every way imaginable!"

    Doc, I didn't say I didn't enjoy it. I said the fashions (and the hairdos) were shockers.

    Shit, I don't even remember much of the 70s and 80s, but what bits I do remember can best be described as "character forming".

  • 16 - STM

    May 29, 2009 at 12:13 am

    Bliff: "STM: you saw the Brit version on FTA?"

    In Australia Bliff ... I think FTA is a bit different Down Under.

    There are five FTA channels. The three commercial ones make a fortune from sports broadcasts and advertising, and run ratings seasons where you get some really, really good TV along with the usual dross.

    The other two, the ABC and SBS, are government-funded. SBS has great foreign movies and docos, while the ABC has great current affairs and some excellent shows imported mostly from the UK (often BBC proudctions) but also some from the US and other English-speaking countries.

    Then there's the 300 channels of nothing on cable.

    Actually, cable's not too bad here either.

    I just can't work out how to unlock the parental control device :)

  • 17 - Christopher Rose

    May 29, 2009 at 4:12 am

    Oi Stan, just cos the Doc and I are two rare English voices amidst the Seppos is no excuse to mix us up!

    As to 70s and 80s fashion, add the 60s as well and I'd rather any of those fashions, including the ones I hate, than before or since. Indeed, there is a case to be made that any real sense of style died at least a decade ago!

  • 18 - roger nowosielski

    May 29, 2009 at 5:05 am

    The three no-nos in my book: bell bottoms, knits and sideburns.

  • 19 - Robert M. Barga

    May 29, 2009 at 5:45 am

    what is sad is that my generation is picking up your crappy trends as retro fashion
    me, i am fine with jeans and a tshirt

  • 20 - STM

    May 29, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Robert: "me, i am fine with jeans and a tshirt".

    Likewise ... with ones for work, ones for piss-farting about in, ones for going to the pub with the boys on Sunday afternoons, others for going to the beach in ... and last but not least, the good ones for going out in and impressing sheilas :)

    Yeah sorry Rosey, it is because you and Doc are kindred spirits.

    You both write similarly too. Sentence structure is near identical.

    Queen's English???

    Now, settle, Seppos ... not that kinda queen ...

  • 21 - STM

    May 29, 2009 at 8:58 am

    Dave: "I found your description of the prayer meeting an interesting contrast to our state GOP convention where they had a designated prayer room which was entirely empty for the duration of the event".

    Lol. That's hilarious Dave.

    I would've thought they'd be in there en masse praying for the demise of Obama.

  • 22 - Robert M. Barga

    May 29, 2009 at 4:49 pm

    pretty much that is how i role
    but two for the chicks, i party two nights a week, dont want them seeing the same thing twice in a row

  • 23 - Robert M. Barga

    May 29, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    @21
    thinking about it, it is ironic when that is the Chirstian party

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 18, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs