When I think about, and in all honestly I try not to give the world of popular culture too much thought because it tends to make me cranky-hence this article-, I begin to see a correlation between Oprah's book club and The Lists. As she gains more influence on the minds and hearts of the consumer, others have begun to worry that their self-perceived place in the pantheon of mass cultural impact is being eroded.
Establishments like "Time Magazine", who've always had an overblown view of their own importance (Man of The Year), are finally beginning to realize that they are not even close to being the only game in town anymore. As a weekly they've never been able to be as topical as the newspapers, and now with more and more people using the Internet as a source of news, they have become even less relevant. They and the other print media are desperate to find the means to regain their positions as the voice of authority.
Thus the lists: create a category that makes it significant and unique to your publication, and yours becomes the definitive list. Perception and appearance are what matters today above substance, so that the actual content of a list is secondary to the fact that people see you as being important enough to produce one. If worded correctly, like "Time's" best since we've been publishing lists, people don't tend to question why you've done it, instead they treat them seriously. Even when they disagree with you they are giving credence to the fact that what you say matters.
I could spew out list after list and probably no one would give a damn. I just don't have the reputation or influence. But for magazines like "Time", "Rolling Stone", "Newsweek", and "People", these things are becoming more and more important. It used to be that most publications would do some sort of end of the year round up, an annual summation to help their audiences put the previous months in perspective.
But now it seems like they create any old excuse to come up with a best of type list that will increase their appearance of mattering. It's like they are all hoping that they will become a label on the cover of a book or a record. In the past a book may have had a special notice about the author winning the Booker or the Pulitzer Prize; a record a Grammy; a video an Oscar, and so on.







Article comments
1 - Robert
List are popular because they are fun.
Period.
People love to discuss and disagree, not to mention just think about what should or should not be on a particular list. A list is nothing more than criticism. Your article itself is critisism, so it comes from the same mold as lists do. In essence, you are using the very method you are arguing against.
So, are you really sure you want to be a blogger? Because lists and blogs go together like Salt & Pepper.
2 - JR
Top Ten People Who Don't Belong On Any List:
...um... uh-oh.
3 - Temple A. Stark
Gypsyman,
This post was chosen by the section editor as a BC pick of the week. Go HERE (link) to find out why.
And thank you
- Temple
4 - Oran Kelley
Unfortunately the entry has changed from the "pick of the week" on lists to a tiresome fictional run-through of the water-export scare story so popular here in the midwest.
They're coming for our children next . . .
opk
5 - Oran Kelley
Seems to be fixed!
opk