Journalism Is Itself a Religion - Page 11

What I want to do, I want to fulfill my role as a decent human member of the community and a decent and patriotic American. And therefore, I am willing to give the government, the President and the military the benefit of any doubt here in the beginning. I'm going to fulfill my role as a journalist, and that is ask the questions, when necessary ask the tough questions.

Here is a journalist, prominent in the priesthood, a visible figure in the extreme; here is Dan Rather trying to explain what attaches Dan Rather to the fate of the American people, nation and government. But his religion doesn't really go there. It has tough stuff in it about detachment, but about attachment to the republic little is said. Rather is also attempting to explain what he is for, in the end. But the language is too thin, the politics timid and confused, the belief system sounds exhausted.

This was confirmed for me when I watched Rather's exclusive interview with Saddam before the war in Iraq began. It was the work of a man who did not know what he was ultimately for, or why he was taken in blindfold to the Palace that day. He did know, however, that no one else in the press had succeeded in landing an interview with Saddam since his inclusion in the American President's "axis of evil." No one had done it, so Rather did.

And in the room where his encounter with evil (so declared) took place, Dan Rather, it seemed to me, had come armed with nothing stronger than "ask the questions, when necessary ask the tough questions" of Saddam Hussein-- the mass murderer and tyrant who ruled in terror over a closed society, a republic of dense fear, where question-asking got you killed. "I'm here for my interview."

That was a situation where journalism, the religion, failed the believer. It was the wisdom of the news tribe, and the moral sense it had developed about its methods, but also the questions it never asked itself and had no answers for... all that sent Rather to Baghdad and gave him no better--alas, no deeper--instruction than, "Bring 'Face the Nation' to Saddam Hussein." The anchor man looked lost. Saddam looked happy. I still don't know what Rather thought he was going to accomplish.

Jeff Sharlet, the new editor of The Revealer, read a draft of this essay. He had this to say about a belief in journalism, the profession:

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10 — Page 11 — Page 12

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Images of a Free Press Images of a Free Press

    Rich in historical detail, Images of a Free Press is an elegant, powerful guide to the evolution of our modern conception of freedom of the press, which finds expression in laws that protect print ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Docv

    Jan 08, 2004 at 12:28 pm

    God, why do the religious nuts always write so much unreadable blather? Try beliefnet. :)

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 20, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs