Is Great Depression II on the Horizon? - Page 2

Part of: BC Business

While these speculative booms benefitted a few, most of America, Smith writes, “had been in a recession ever since the dot-com bubble burst…The job loss that began in 1999 has continued at a greater or lesser pace ever since. More likely this is the result of globalization.”

Economic prospects for many were fading because the American economy's core has been in the process of decoupling from the periphery, leaving most Americans in the hinterlands of falling incomes and growing want. The core is no longer investing in America, but investing abroad. But the diminished spending power of the average American contributed to the economic contractions. It was declining household net worth that preceded each of the last two recessions. Smith writes in “Structure of a Recession, Part 1”:

The red line indicates the net worth of U.S. household, plotted on the right axis. It flattens out and declines just before 2001 and collapses in 2007. In each case it precedes the weak job market by about a year and in each case the job market does not turn around until net worth starts rising again.

And household net worth again declined after the most recent, epic economic recession, setting the stage for another economic contraction.

Expansion of Welfare Needed Now to Prevent Descent of Tens of Millions Into Poverty

Growing productivity and globalization are part of the reasons for these epic collapses, helping increase profits while at the same time keeping unemployment high and wages down as the American worker has to compete with cheap labor abroad.

These trends are not over nor can they be addressed through any job-creation schemes because there is no demand for the surplus workers—millions of jobs have been shipped abroad, especially to China, a country which developed an enormous industrial base which its domestic consumer market cannot support, and replacements for these jobs can't be magically waved into existence.

In the absence of generous welfare provisions like those in Europe, structural unemployment in the U.S. will exact a terrible social toll as poverty rates rise in the near future. Unfortunately, policies thus far have been informed by  an austerity dogma, centered not on expansion of federal spending or expansion of social services but on cutting them. Without a vast expansion of the safety net, however, more will fall into poverty in the coming years and overall the economy will continue to deteriorate.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for a-jurek

Article Author: A. Jurek

A. Jurek is co-editor of the Culture section at Blogcritics. Write A. Jurek at a.jurek@blogcritics.org

Visit A. Jurek's author page

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Glenn Contrarian

    Jul 11, 2011 at 11:36 am

    Jurek -

    I agree with you for the most part when it comes to the prospects for the American economy and the American people. Europe will be hurt badly, but not as much as will America.

    BUT as I pointed out in this article, there's an unintended upside to the globalization that accelerated America's grand economic decline. While economics is not a zero-sum game, the fact is that Asia has benefited greatly from America's economic foolishness.

    For instance, I recently read how Shanghai went from having zero skyscrapers in 1980 to the present day where they have twice as many as NYC. I know firsthand how Asia's changed in the past thirty years. My two sons are living there now, and (God willing) my wife and I will be moving there in October. Why? Because times change, empires rise and fall (though more quickly in the modern age), and America has entered her decline. The time of Asia as the center of the economic world is at hand, and as liberal as I certainly am, I believe that Reagan is the one who should receive most of the credit (or the blame, depending on one's views) for Asia's meteoric economic rise.

    Patriotism certainly has its place (I'm retired military), but a man should be willing (and hopefully able) to live in another nation when necessary, just as a man should be willing to move from a house and home that he loves when it's no longer safe or affordable to live there. America has so much to offer, true - but I believe the malignant cancer of corporate greed has metastasized. Thomas Jefferson warned us that corporate greed posed a greater danger to America than would any other nation or army, and he was right.

    I love America and I gave her twenty years of my life. My greater duty and responsibility now is to look out for my wife and sons. It's time to leave. It's my great good fortune that I have opportunity and ability (and adaptability) to do so.

    P.S. - I think your article should have been published in the Politics section.

  • 2 - Steve

    Jul 13, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    China's economic miracle: Construct a new city, tear it down and build it again! lol.

  • 3 - John

    Oct 21, 2011 at 12:16 am

    Steve's comment above is awesome...and so true :) Hey as long as people are working and still spending right?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs