"Howl," Your Morals, and the FCC - Page 2

The First Amendment right guaranteeing free speech is the issue here, even though it’s being obscured by the FCC’s self-important view of what constitutes “acceptable” speech. But even though the situation highlights the true dunderheaded silliness of the FCC’s point of view, all is not bad, because the censorship of an artistic event by the government usually results in unruly fame for that event.

Poetry is not much read in the United States, and without the 1957 trial, “Howl” would probably have remained an important work by an obscure poet, read only by students in the academy and the struggling few who actually write poetry themselves. But because of the trial, Howl, And Other Poems has now sold almost a million copies, and continues to sell briskly. Happily, it is such a fine poem, so terrifying a view of contemporary society, and one so beautifully written that it is my opinion that few who read it will be unaffected by it.

Ginsberg was culturally prescient as well. In the second section of the poem, a long accusation of American industrial/government rapaciousness, he uses the figure of Moloch as a symbol of corporate indifference to the individual.

Moloch whose mind is pure machinery! Moloch whose
blood is running money! Moloch whose fingers are ten armies! Moloch whose breast is a cannibal dynamo! Moloch whose ear is a smoking tomb!”

The biblical Moloch was one of the princes of Hell. A terrifying demon, he is described by John Milton in "Paradise Lost" as "besmeared with blood/Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears," a fearsome devil who eats the children of the faithful. Ginsberg’s Moloch is the self-serving corporate entity who, for money, foments armed conflict. A more accurate metaphor for the current war footing of the United States cannot be found.

Perhaps the muffling of “Howl” in 2007 will bring about the same firestorm of wild enthusiasm on the part of a general public that the 1957 trial caused. This would be a humorous and good thing, and it may just happen. One hopes that imaginative minds will prevail against the FCC watchdogs of your personal morals, in the way that Judge Clayton W. Horn prevailed, who officiated at the 1957 “Howl” obscenity trial. He wrote in his opinion, “Would there be any freedom of press or speech if one must reduce his vocabulary to vapid innocuous euphemism?”

The answer, of course, is no.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for terence-clarke

Article Author: Terence Clarke

Terence Clarke is a San Francisco novelist, journalist, and film maker who writes about the arts. His latest novel is A Kiss For SeƱor Guevara.

Visit Terence Clarke's author pageTerence Clarke's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Kevin Eagan

    Oct 06, 2007 at 1:10 pm

    Excellent opinion piece on such an excellent poem, a poem that still rings true today. I'll let some of my fellow poetry students know about this recent development with the FCC, not surprising though.

  • 2 - bliffle

    Oct 06, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    My friends and I all read "Howl" in 1957 and knew immediately that it was about us and was a call to rebellion.

    So we did.

    Then the system seeks to drown everything under their bland blanket of manipulation. And mostly succeeds.

    But "Howl" comes to life again. One wonders what these 2007 people will do with it.

  • 3 - Jon Sobel

    Oct 06, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    Great piece and worthy of note. I hadn't heard this news anywhere else. It's amazing that 50 years later this classic work can be censored. But when you think about it, passages of Shakespeare and the Bible have been excised in this nutty country too.

  • 4 - The Haze

    Oct 06, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    When fear of reprisal is the motivating factor to cower and do nothing,the resulting fate is well deserved.

  • 5 - Mark Saleski

    Oct 06, 2007 at 11:18 pm

    great piece.

    it's really sad how the fcc has basically given free reign to do whatever they'd like.

  • 6 - Baronius

    Oct 09, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    It's an amazing poem, but it is appropriate for radio broadcast? Really? I get the symbolism of "Howl" being censored (although it's not actual censorship). But the poem isn't fit for all ages.

  • 7 - Mark Saleski

    Oct 09, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    for community radio? yeah, they should play it.

    and no, it's not direct sensorship, but self-sensorship, since there appear to be no actual rules about these things.

  • 8 - Jose

    Oct 09, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    This is really good. Honestly, I'm happy someone wrote about Howl, because I've been trying to find out what the big deal was with this poem. Well written, too.

    jose

  • 9 - laura

    Nov 03, 2007 at 9:44 pm

    About Howl and wbai. WBAI is bankrupt. Dan Siegel of the Pacifica National Board is corrupt. He has been temporarily placed on the national board for one month to sabotage the elections and allow the WBAI and Justice and Unity corruption to continue.

  • 10 - bliffle

    Nov 04, 2007 at 2:02 pm

    Of course it's quite easy to find Ginsberg reading "Howl" on youtube.

    While there, the enthusiastic reader of poetry might find it interesting to taste other vigorous poems of the era by Kerouac, Corso, Kenneth Patchens "The Artists Duty".

    Maybe I've found the obscenity in "Howl": they

    "...who bared their brains to Heaven..."

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs