Good medicine, bad medicine

Robert Bradbury has some good news and some bad news about the National Institutes of Health nanomedicine roadmap initiative shindig this week:

    The good news... The NIH really seems to understand that to make progress in nanotech one must integrate researchers from various areas of expertise. The bad news... Few if any people attending the conference have read any of the background literature on what nanotechnology or nanomedicine really involve. When I mentioned or or , during the interactive periods they generally were unrecognized. This seems to be consistent with the Drexler v. Smalley debate which suggests that most scientists simply have not done their homework (in terms of learning about nanotechnology). More here

Related Posts

Nanobots: Body and antibody

Do no harm: Don't forget Freitas

For greener planet, remove people; results may vary

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Nanomedicine, Vol. I: Basic Capabilities Nanomedicine, Vol. I: Basic Capabilities

    Molecular nanotechnology has been defined as the three-dimensional positional control of molecular structure to create materials and devices to molecular precision. The human body is comprised of ...

  • Nanomedicine, Vol. IIA: Biocompatibility Nanomedicine, Vol. IIA: Biocompatibility

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 30, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs