Figgerin' the Odds: James Cameron's Tomb of Jesus - Comments Page 2

"Those names are common" is no objection to filmmaker James Cameron's claim that he has located the tomb of Jesus.

Among the chief objections made to filmmaker James Cameron's claim that he may have located the tomb of Jesus is that the names found on the ossuaries were common in that time and place. I wondered a few days ago, how common?…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - SHARK

    Mar 05, 2007 at 5:13 pm

    Jaz, in Shark's World, provenance is everything.

    ========


    late thought:


    RE: "...James Dobson's Focus on the Family cites a Liberty University professor..." from the original 'essay' --

    Saying "a Liberty University Professor" is akin to saying "an antarctic saguaro cactus".

    Just tryin' to be helpful,
    S

  • 27 - jaz

    Mar 05, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    understood, SHARK...mine as well, which is why the caveat about the James ossuary and those possibilities

    just to be clear, i neither believe nor disbelieve all of this, i just think it's worth the Study...especially in light of the implications

    it would be nice to dispel Myth, and show a great Teacher for the Man that he was

    but i'm silly like that, and will reserve final Judgement until more Facts are in

  • 28 - Don

    Mar 06, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    What I find mind boggling is in 1980/82 they found a tomb with bone boxes inscribed with all of those possibly Jesus family related names on them and they didn't keep even save a small sample of bone from each box for subsequent DNA testing. They handed the remains over to some religious group that re-buried them somewhere.

  • 29 - David Cameron

    Mar 07, 2007 at 11:02 am

    I saw the Tomb last night & think that science could prevail over politics here if science could prevail over politics here...
    If a fraction of the $ garnered by the film were allowed (by IAA &??) to be used for full DNA & chemical signature testing on both relevant & irrelevant (for control) ossuaries, and a neutral-as-possible panel of paleologists & statistitians were put to work on the questions, the evidentuary truth would out.

    I also think politics & bias are stronger than truth. At least they have been for the last 2500 years!

  • 30 - Sam Wilde

    Mar 08, 2007 at 11:29 am

    So, just where are the bones.... which might have lots more DNA available than the scrapings off the bottom of the boxes? Gone forever with no hope of science getting at them?

  • 31 - jaz

    Mar 08, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    the bones were buried in 1980 according to Jewish tradition, in unmarked graves...so are now completely unavailable to researches...the only material available is residue in the ossuaries

  • 32 - bogdan

    Jul 16, 2007 at 9:37 am

    """The bones contained in the boxes have long since been reburied, according to Jewish custom, in unmarked graves in Israel."""


    FIND THE BONES STUPID PEOPLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 25, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs