I tend to be a fairly empathetic person. That means not forming a definite opinion about people accused of wrongdoing until I know most or all the facts available. I was sympathetic to the Portland Seven until the guilty pleas began. I hope Michael Jackson is not a child molester. I did not make up my mind about O.J. Simpson until after I was sure he had motive, means and opportunity to kill two people — not to mention leaving his DNA on the scene. So, my inclination is to believe Marion Jones, the Olympian whose supposed involvement with the BALCO doping scandal has been widely discussed, is innocent. Jones (pictured) has not been charged by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, but the allegations cloud what should have been a glowing future for the athlete who won five medals in 2000. In fact, a pattern of poor performances at the Olympic trials by athletes associated with the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative (BALCO) has emerged. Guilty or blameless, their ability to perform is deteriorating.
The stress seems to be taking a toll on Jones, who has failed to qualify for her best event in this year's Olympics. Tim Layden, writing at CNN commented on the disappointing news.
Jones' fifth-place finish in the 100-meter final was staggering only in the moment it occurred. To see the erstwhile Mrs. Jones, winner of five medals in Sydney, holder of the seven fastest non-Flo-Jo 100-meter times in history and at her best an overwhelming presence on the track, flatten out at 50 meters and struggle home deep in the field was briefly disorienting
However, Layden dismisses the trauma of being the central figure in an embarrassing episode as irrelevant to Jones' failure.
Was she distracted from preparation by the Balco scandal? No sale. Sprinters train a few hours a day. She's supposed to be a professional and, what's more, it's her own high-priced legal and PR team that has pushed Jones to the front of the Balco Affair with an aggressive and questionably pre-emptive strategy.
Article comments
1 - Eric Olsen
thanks Mac, I hope you're right. Jones won the high jump trials today
2 - Mac Diva
Another aspect of this that is troubling is the legal apparatus involved. When these cases go to arbitration, the rules of evidence used in civil and criminal proceedings don't apply. It is possible for the accused to be 'convicted' on hearsay alone. For example, if Marion Jones' disgruntled ex-husband says he saw her use an illegal substance, that will be a step toward ruling against her, despite lack of corroboration and Hunter's own credibility problems. Since there is no smoking gun evidence of use of undetectable steroids, the chances of people being banned despite what would normally be considered lack of evidence is very high.