Exhibition Review: Myths of Bengal at the British Museum

What is conjured up in your mind by the phrase "women of India"? You might think the powerful figure of Indira Gandhi, but more likely you'll be thinking about dowry killings, sati, underfed girl-children — images of abuse and suffering. It is striking then that what shines out of the British Museum's new Myths of Bengal exhibition is a vision of female power — dangerous, often out-of-control power, but certainly of a force to be reckoned with.

At its centre - physically and intellectually - is Durga, the supremely powerful goddess created by all of her fellow divine beings at a time when they had been almost overwhelmed by demons. Armed with a weapon donated by each of the gods, and mounted on a lion, she ensured that, after an appropriately fierce battle, order was restored to the world.

Durga greets visitors to the exhibition in a fantastically detailed carving of the malleable "pith from the inside of a shola weed" (surely a curator's nightmare to handle). Serenely triumphant in victory, she's totally in control - the matriarch - flanked by her daughters Lakshmi and Saraswati and at the bottom (unusually enough), her sons, Ganesh and Kartik.

Yet soon, the visitor sees, her story is more problematic as a vision of female power. Charted in historical prints and modern-day photographs is the annual Durga Puja in Bengal, when her victory is celebrated. But like the Greek Persephone, she must leave this happy scene at the end of the ceremony to return to her husband Shiva, who stays far away in the Himalayas. Her sorrow is heavy as she turns her steps towards him — reflecting no doubt the anguish of many a young mortal bride.

Yet there is, there must be, consolation. Among the items here is a 19th-century "modern" revelation, a salesman's catalogue of 75 examples of cheap coloured prints. Once that young wife would have had to visit the temple (if she was allowed such a freedom) to see images of the goddess and her suffering, to be comforted perhaps by the parallel with her own circumstances — now she could have it in her own home. And if the colours are tawdry, the printing rough, to our sophisticated 21st century eye, that doesn't detract from the human stories you can imagine behind them.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for natalie-bennett

Article Author: Natalie Bennett

Natalie blogs at Philobiblon, on books, history and all things feminist. In her public life she's the leader of the Green Party of England and Wales.

Visit Natalie Bennett's author pageNatalie Bennett's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Q Bit

    Sep 16, 2006 at 9:54 pm

    Natalie:
    Thanks for the wonderful review. Here are some notes that you and the readers might find helpful.

    1.flanked by her daughters Lakshmi and Saraswati and at the bottom (unusually enough), her sons, Ganesh and Kartik.

    Lakshmi is the goddess of wealth.
    Saraswati is the goddess of wisdom and learning.
    Ganesh is the god of knowledge but for reasons unknown he's always a favorite of the business establishment.
    Kartik is the war god and supposedly the most handsome of all gods.

    2. The story goes that Chando is a merchant who stubbornly rejects the goddess, clinging to the worship of Shiva.

    The name of the guy is Chand which means moon. People usually call him "Chand Saudagar" meaning " Chand- the merchant".

  • 2 - Natalie Bennett

    Sep 17, 2006 at 6:18 am

    Thanks for the kind words. I've checked my notes and they definitely say Chando - but perhaps I was having a small hallucination.

    I'll check in the Museum next time I'm in - perhaps the name is transliterated different from a different language or "translation" system - like Ganesh/Ganesha?

  • 3 - Q Bit

    Sep 17, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    Natalie:
    I wouldn't be surprised if the Museum refers to him as "Chando". You are right when you say it's because "the name is transliterated different from a different language" (which is Bengali in this case).

    But you can take my word on this and correct the museum folks - it should be Chand and not Chando ("Chando" doesn't exist in bengali). But I guess it doesn't make a big difference.

    Ganesh is the correct one, but Ganesha is fine too--in South India it's Ganeshan :-)

  • 4 - diana hartman

    Sep 18, 2006 at 6:27 am

    I am pleased to tell you this article is being featured in the Culture Focus today, September 18th.

    Diana Hartman
    Culture Editor

  • 5 - Howard Dratch

    Sep 26, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    Natalie: The exhibition sounds fascinating but I followed all the links and the BM only shows one image. The other links go to a great site on mythology (thanks) and one on Discovering Islamic Art with some architectural photos of mosques I would surely never see in person. However, is there more of the exhibition on-line?


  • 6 - Natalie Bennett

    Sep 26, 2006 at 4:41 pm

    Hi Howard. Sorry, there doesn't seem to be anything else online. I did post an admittedly not very good picture of the main display kantha. Unfortunately because of the glass and the nature of the lighting, getting any decent pictures was a challenge.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs