"Criminal: A person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation." — Clarence Darrow
Will Enron get away with it? Will the people not be able to see the forest for the trees? The corporation for the criminals? In Enron Outrage Championed, Lukas Velush writes about how former Snohomish County PUD commissioner Roger Rice is baffled that there isn't more outrage about Enron's latest attempt to steal from the people:
- Rice wonders why Snohomish County residents who may be forced to pay Enron $122 million aren't more angry despite proof that the PUD's contract with the bankrupt energy trader was illegal.
- The stage is now set. We have looked at the nature of the problem--activities conducted by a small number of parties that are harmful to many. These activities are often a natural consequence of the way corporations are chartered--to make a profit. We have looked at the nature of government, particularly governments designed to serve the people, including managing the commons--the shared resources used by everyone in the community.
We have said that when the people within a company make a decision that harms the common welfare, they are often not held accountable for their actions because they claim "it was the corporation that did it." Yet we have also seen that these same parties have claimed, and won, constitutional protections for the legal fiction that we call corporations, protections that were originally designed to protect people from the dangers of despotic governments. (42)
- Enron Gouged Western Customers for at Least $1.1 billion, Public Utility Says
Enron Tapes Expose Blatant Criminality of Corporate America
Britons Fight Extradition on Enron Fraud
Prosecutors Seeking Lay Indictment








Article comments
1 - Ms. Tek
I keep recommending that book. Excellent.