Does Suri Cruise Exist? (And Should We Care?) - Page 2

And reality television fits right into this schema. We make celebrities out of average people and we get off watching them do next to nothing. When Baudrillard talks about the elevation of the banal to the status of art, we could just as easily substitute fame or celebrity. When we elevate the banal to the level of celebrity (or the celebrity to the level of the banal) is celebrity meaningless?

Back to Suri Cruise, why should we care? It's ironic that they would keep their child out of the public eye to avoid unwanted publicity and intrusion into their private lives, but by doing so they've probably spawned more discourse and nasty gossip than they would have otherwise. Is there any way celebrities can live under the public radar when living under the public radar simply pushes one further into it? (i.e. Why is Harper Lee's absence from the literary world after publishing To Kill a Mockingbird more interesting to most people than the book itself?)

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for bryan-mckay

Article Author: Bryan McKay

Bryan McKay is a freelance media artist, filmmaker, and writer. He lives in Brookline, Massachusetts.

Visit Bryan McKay's author pageBryan McKay's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Kiki

    Jul 18, 2006 at 3:46 pm

    I find it hard to believe that those two are suddenly so concerned about their privacy, considering how they have flaunted their relationship from the beginning. It is definitely not in Tom's nature to avoid the media - especially when there is a movie to promote.

  • 2 - larry

    Jul 18, 2006 at 4:16 pm

    i say who cares?








  • 3 - Bryan McKay

    Jul 18, 2006 at 6:13 pm

    Actually, Kiki, Tom was very private (and continues to be) about the lives of his older children, so I'm not sure why this one should be any different. He seems like a guy that knows how to separate his personal and professional lives for the most part.

  • 4 - Chris Evans

    Jul 18, 2006 at 7:18 pm

    Sorry to go off topic but...OMG you go to Emerson--I'm dying of envy.

  • 5 - Boxclocke

    Jul 19, 2006 at 4:13 am

    Oh, the baby does indeed exist. It's just not Tom's.

  • 6 - Joxe

    Aug 05, 2006 at 1:59 am

    I think most of the comments I am reading in the blogs and in the media are really nuts. Come on guys, get a life! Tom is just living HIS life and he is really happy with Katie and he has a beautiful family. You think he cares about what you are writing here? If I were Tom I would show my baby to no one. A family is not a circus. I would never show my bay to the world if I were him. Family is sacred and none of your business. As per the way you speak you seem to have the right to everything. Sorry, that is only true in your minds. In the real universe somebody sane would do exactly what Tom is doing. He is keeping his family safe from the media!!!!!

  • 7 - Manny

    Aug 29, 2006 at 4:04 pm

    I say suri is an experiment gone wrong. You see, they've got all these pods in the Scientology bulding on Sunset Blvd and suri is supposed to be a clone of Tom (refererence:"The Invasion of the Body snatchers"). Suri is an incomplete , imperfect version of Tom. So there. Now, get a life, people.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs