Did the LinkedIn IPO Help Usher in Tech Bubble 2.0?

Part of: BC Business

Remember the New Economy and the tech bubble of the late 1990s? It seems to have returned, although in a different form. This time around, we are witnesses to the long wake of a Web 2.0 economy: massive initial public offerings (IPOs) for what are essentially micro-marketing portals like Facebook and a host of others that are coming to the forefront of a new kind of cybereconomy. Whereas Web 1.0 promised that sites like Pets.com would be worth their stock value because of their product, the new tech bubble seeks to monetize social networks. LinkedIn is a case in point.

LinkedIn logoAfter posting a much ballyhooed IPO last month at $45 a share, LinkedIn has come a long way. Reid Hoffman fired up the idea for what has become a burgeoning peer-network of professionals in 2002 and officially came online in May 2003, according to the official website. The company also estimates that 100 million people use the portal worldwide in order to connect and build their career horizons. All presumptions aside and contrary to appearances, is this item actually evidence of a new tech bubble? Business Insider writer Henry Blodget did not seem to think so.

Blodget tried to puncture the bubble-thought by posing the hypothesis that dozens of such companies would have to go public at even higher valuations for a new bubble to be a reality. However, big financial firms appear to be latching onto these kinds of ventures. When Facebook posted its IPO a few months ago, one of the most visible players that swept in to buy up sheafs of shares was global giant Goldman Sachs.

And now, with LinkedIn on the stock exchange, who has become its white knight? Morgan Stanley.

Notwithstanding the fact that other big names like Amazon, Palm, Twitter and American Express are listed among its 23 corporate partners, Morgan Stanley now owns 23 percent of LinkedIn’s Class A shares, which certainly does not give the firm any control valve over the company but does translate into significant leverage. So did Goldman’s astronomical $450 million investment in Mark Zuckerberg’s multi-billion-dollar-valued creation, which has utterly transformed how the Web economy operates. Morgan Stanley is classified as a heavy hitter, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, whose website opensecrets.org  tabulates all of the donations and expenditures that lobbyists dole out to politicians. 

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.