Defending Pop Culture - Page 2

Next there is "High Theory/Low Culture" [Mikita Brottman, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005], which is less defensive of pop culture, but works to apply the art of high criticism and theory to the often gutterized world of fashion magazines, tabloids and horror movies. Brottman remarks how popularity in one generation often leads to classic status in the next.

"Pop culture is often defined in terms of what it is not - opera, theater, poetry, classical music and so on. And yet it is well-known that writers such as Samuel Richardson, Mark Twain, Charles Dickens have been afforded "classic" status, despite their one-time popularity and their use of such 'low' cultural tools as melodrama, scandal, burlesque, stereotype and violent action...Pop culture then, can apparently be transformed into 'high' culture by a simple, critical act of appropriation...the popular culture of one decade can easily become the high culture of the next."

So let me stand with what is worthy, popular or unknown.

- Chip / Culture Drift

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Everything Bad Is Good for You: How Today's Popular Culture Is Actually Making Us Smarter Everything Bad Is Good for You: How Today's Popular Culture Is Actually Making...

    From the author of the New York Times bestseller Mind Wide Open comes a groundbreaking assessment of popular culture as it's never been considered before: through the lens of intelligence. ...

  • High Theory/Low Culture High Theory/Low Culture

    In High Theory, Low Culture, Brottman uses the tools of "high" cultural theory to examine many areas of today's popular culture, including style magazines, sports, shopping, tabloid newspapers, horror ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Lee Ennis

    Jun 19, 2005 at 6:05 am

    You said, "But criticism should be based on art's true merit, not for its level of popularity."

    Very true. But, there is no art in TV...

  • 2 - rp

    Jun 19, 2005 at 7:16 am

    Great article. I unfortunately was one of those boasty "I only like it if it's unpopular" people, until other close-minded elitist dumbasses started to annoy me. And even then it took me a while to realize their sins were my own.

    The Brottman/Macmillan paragraph reminds me of the rise of Eminem in 2002 (circa 8 Mile), when popular opinion of him went from "insensitive jerkass" to "new millennial poet, one of the great wordsmiths of our generation." All it took was critical acclaim in Hollywood to make his art legitimate -- now, with the masses on his side, he's immune to protesters. Funny how that works.

    "But, there is no art in TV..."

    In a few centuries, if not a few decades, I'm sure that'll be like saying there's no art in theatre. What's allowed to be called "art" changes, for better or worse.

  • 3 - That Guy

    May 19, 2009 at 3:47 pm

    dude.."hard as hell video games?" compare the average difficulty of a classic NES game (Zelda, Punch-Out, any regular Mario title) to the average difficulty of any game to this date and, for the most part, video games are drastically easier. They have done this to sell out to players complaining that "I can't beat this part" years ago.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 25, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs