If you have been following the webcaster royalty bill, you know that its path has been serpentine. Just when it appeared that everything had been resolved and the path was clear for final passage in the Senate, antebellum dinosaur Jesse Helms put a hold on the legislation Thursday night, stopping it dead for now.
The zig has zagged again:
- Small Webcasters won't immediately have to pay new, potentially steep royalty fees due next week, the group responsible for collecting payments said Friday.
The new rules for Webcasters, under which Internet radio stations will be required to pay about a 14th of a cent for each song they stream to each listener, are scheduled to go into effect on Sunday.
Small companies, which had complained the fees would put them out of business, were close to winning separate rules in a compromise Congressional bill. The measure was blocked before the Senate adjourned Thursday night.
However, the record industry-backed SoundExchange--the group tasked with overseeing and distributing the new song royalty fees to labels and artists--said late Friday it would not collect the full fees from small companies as long as Congress is still considering the legislation.
"Given the unfortunate fact that a lone Senator apparently held up the small Webcasters' bill, we felt it appropriate to offer this proposal," John Simson, SoundExchange's executive director, said in a statement. "We hope that this unexpected development will be soon resolved by the Senate."
Under the SoundExchange proposal, any Webcaster that would have qualified for help under the pending bill will only have to pay the $500 minimum annual fee contained in the measure. The fee would still be retroactive to 1998 for as many years as the Net radio service had been in operation, up to a total of $2,500.
.jpg?t=20120516015139)
Article comments
1 - BJ
Do we know what Helms's problem is?
2 - Eric Olsen
Apparently religious broadcasters had a problem with the compromise as it stood.