Home / Crueler Terrorism

Crueler Terrorism

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I will not interfere with any comments unless you ask for it. This is as well for the previous post, or any posts that will follow.

Can terrorism even be crueler, then it already is? That is a good question, and I don’t know if I have any answer on it that is complete.

There will be those who say that the Europeans know nothing about terrorism. Yet when Bush mentioned that when speaking about it, many in Europe were angry, because they thought (and were right too), that he did not know what he was talking about. The difference is that although Europe has a history filled with conflicts, civil wars, guerrillas and terrorism as well as peaceful periods, none of the terrorist attacks from the past 25 years was on the same scale as 9/11.

The terrorist attack of 9/11 was on a scale bigger then most European attacks. Even the one at Lockerbie wasn’t that big or devastating. I can remember being a kid and the bloody attacks of a criminal group in Belgium, and I can remember not traveling with school to Paris (France) because of the fear of bomb attacks, and the same for London. This is around 10 years ago. And there has been for a long time the IRA and the ETA who were active there.

Recently I read here on one of the blogs of one of the members about a crueler form of terrorism. Terrorism can be crueler then it already is depending on the weapons used, and how many casualties. Here however the weapons used were those they often use in Iraq. The cruelty lies not in the fact of the weapons used, but of the person who used them.

I am not one 100% certain anymore but I thought it was a person with Down’s Syndrome who was talked into doing that. He couldn’t let the explosives detonate himself, other people could do that.

He walked towards a group of waiting people but then changed his beliefs (not his religion) and started moving away to the people who held the remote for the detonator. They blew him up.

This clearly shows that they are against the freedom of their own people. They would rather blow them up then give them the chance to walk away alive. I do not know if this is the work of any groups related to the Osama bin Laden Gang, or not. But they cannot say that their actions are for the freedom of their people, this action only shows that they want to order other people around. A dictatorship it is called, I thought.

Blowing somebody up who changed his beliefs (not his religion) and did not want to harm other people is terrorism. That is cruelty too.

I’m well aware they call themselves Al Qaeda but calling them that way, would mean I credit them with respect, and they don’t deserve that. The Osama bin Laden Gang is only the criminal organization which Mr. Osama bin Laden the leader of Al Qaeda built, and is not about anyone else of the bin Laden family.

I did not give an answer to the question, because I don’t really have one that is complete. I only wish that those who died or were wounded because of the consequences of terrorism, hadn’t. And that those in Iraq that organize them are stopped as soon as possible. Which many wish, I think.

The next post is a review of the Little Book of Calm

Powered by

About Florisv