Today on Blogcritics
Home » Commentary: Reading for Survival by John D. MacDonald

Commentary: Reading for Survival by John D. MacDonald

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

In a dangerous world filled with stress, the key to survival was memory.  So says the author of The Executioners (later known as "Cape Fear"), John D. MacDonald.  In his last published work before he died in 1986, MacDonald set out to inspire us with Reading for Survival.  

This thirty-one page essay was published in 1987 by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress.  It was also sponsored by the Florida Center  for the Book in Fort Lauderdale.  The essay takes the form of a series of conversations between his fictitious protagonist, Travis McGee, and his friend known only as "Meyer", an economist, teacher and lecturer.   The opening scene finds the two in a docked houseboat darkened by a thunderstorm.  The conversation begins, as does the authors opportunity to share with us his concerns for reading, readers, and non-readers.

Meyer guides us through his version of the evolution of communication beginning with our earliest ancestors' dependency on memory in order to live in the wilderness, recognize signs of nature and the animal kingdom, and then share that knowledge with future generations.  Once the amount of information required was too massive for memory alone, we started making marks on pottery, then cave walls, and the next thing you know, Gutenberg got the masses involved with his press.  Books became artificial memory before the gigabite arrived.  Now we have tons of information and it's available to us at the speed of light.  Google found over nine million results for "gutenberg",  in 0.28 seconds.  What do we do with all this information?  Do we need that much? Consider Len Bias.

Len Bias was a talented basketball player at the University of Maryland.  He was a senior during the same year that Michael Jordan was enjoying his second year in the NBA. Bias was the second player drafted that year and went to the Boston Celtics.  Two days after the draft, he died of a cocaine overdose.  Kenneth Rosenau wrote in The Palm Beach Post, "That [Bias]..was finishing his fourth year at an academically respected school without a prayer of graduating is also an outrage that should be addressed."And  "[He]…was twenty-one credits short of having a degree."  Was Bias any better off than the homo erectus who couldn't remember which snake was poisonous?  Would his judgment have improved had he been a better student?  Meyer asks, "Can one examine his own life without reference to the realities in which he lives?"

 
What about the non-reader, the person who wants to believe because he isn't well informed and doesn't understand the risks?  He's the one "born every minute" that signs up for that variable interest loan with a dubious lender.  
 

MacDonald warns us of the teacher who promotes himself as the translator.  Beware the translator who interprets the information for you.  Think for yourself, he suggests.

Education, literacy, reading, thinking and remembering are MacDonald's prescription for enduring.  He leaves us with a warning from Mark Twain,  "The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them."

Encourage non-readers to enrich their lives and better comprehend the word around them — by reading.

About FCEtier

  • http://www.thecolorsmagazine.com/ lena

    I believe that people invented books for a reason. Not entertainment ones, though I admit I read a lot of “not good” books too. But the books are treasure that we are about to lose. Hundreds and thousands years of experience, emotions, thinking, wondering might go wasted because the generation of today would prefer going to the theatre to watch another action movie.

    Great post.

  • http://etierphotography.blogspot.com/ FCEtier

    MacDonald believed that people invented books for a reason, too. He considered books to be artificial memory.
    Thanks for the comment!

  • http://hopesbreath.blogspot.com/ beth chapman

    Chip it is scarey to me, at 56, to realize how many people do not read. We’ve become so wired, so immediate. As part of my master’s thesis in anthropology, I “studied” anthropology by going back through all the anthropology text books and synchronizing their portrayal of other cultures with our own cultural events and belief systems. That was a mind blower. It is so subtle we don’t notice. Without broadening our mental vistas we’re like cows taking the same path everyday. Great post. Sorry to ramble, but you’ve struck a nerve…. well done!