Today on Blogcritics
Home » Children Of Dune

Children Of Dune

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The recent release of Matrix: Reloaded brought forth the philosophical questioning of free choice vs. predetermination. There have been numerous films which poised these same questions. One of these is the Dune and Children of Dune mini-series (the latter of which was released on DVD today). Both were adapted from a trilogy of books, Dune (adapted into Dune: miniseries), Dune Messiah, and Children of Dune (both adapted into Children of Dune: miniseries) by Frank Herbert.

This epic story is about Paul Maud’Dib Atreides and his prescient abilities. Throughout the story, there is the constant question of whether or not if having those prescient abilities trapped Paul to a predetermined path or whether or not if he had the ability to change that path. However, free choice philosophy wasn’t the only appealing aspect of this mini-series (I speak of both when I use this term), as the universe of Dune is as rich and involving as any scifi universe (ie: Star Wars). The miniseries also involves philosophical questions of the combination of religion and government, how they intertwine and how they shouldn’t intertwine.

Along the lines of the accuracy of adaptation from book to film, it’s impossible to ever get an exact duplicate of book to film, but this mini-series as a whole is probably as accurate as they come. There are of course differentiations as films require a certain amount of story pacing and continuity that comes off entirely differently than books do. I actually slightly prefer the mini-series to the books itself. Some how to me all the characters (with the exception of Chani’s character prior to Children of Dune – miniseries) seemed to be more human and warmer in the miniseries than in the book. Also the director’s cinematography of the story seemed to give it a certain feeling that is indescribably amazing (especially the end of part 1 of Children of Dune: miniseries, which is the adaptation of Dune Messiah).

It isn’t necessary to watch Dune prior to seeing Children of Dune (which is probably the more interesting of the two), but it certainly helps as there are a lot of tie-ins to the original (some that are incredibly touching – ie: Alia at the end of COD). Overall, the entire epic story is an interesting one for philosophical reasonings, political intrigues, and religious issues.

Oh and did I forget to mention the great special effects in Children of Dune? (not Matrix: Reloaded amazing, but definitely comparable to other big-screen titles) Oh, the soundtrack is also amazing. Enough said.

Powered by

About Jack Wong

  • Eric Olsen

    VS, interesting comparison, thanks for bringing it up!

  • Eric Olsen

    I notice you don’t mention the David Lynch Dune film – it’s for the best.

  • http://www.temptationwaits.com visualsimplicity

    Oh I also forgot to mention that the trilogy of books (not the miniseries though) discusses issues of AI with human characteristics (much like the Matrix trilogy) through a historical reference to something called the Butlerian Jihad.

  • zamboya

    why is it that people fail to recognize the more deeply intrinsic comment that Frank Herbert was striving to make – that of “society” as a whole to recognize its addictions and the relationship inherent between the needs of the social beast to the ability of the environment to procure/produce.

    And the David Lynch film was by far, a better and more accurate depiction of the story written by Frank Herbert (considering the author was present during the filming and oversaw the writing of the script) – neither of the mini-series had anything to do with the social critique made by F. Herbert – they had only to do with feeding the childish desires of consumers – which was the most deeply inherent critique of F. Herbert’s regarding our society.

    The only reason people bitch about Lynch’s DUNE is because there isn’t enough sex, violence, and idiocy. But hey – “GREAT” adaptation to mini-series by the sci-fi channel.

  • http://www.temptationwaits.com visualsimplicity

    Frank Herbert’s Dune series was filled with philosophical ideas, the social commentary wasn’t the lone idea. To claim that as the sole commentary is taking away from everything else that Frank Herbert was also trying to say. Regardless, I was merely relating one of his ideas or dilemmas with recent discussions about The Matrix. Also, I believe the social commentaries was less evident within the first trilogy but rather more in second trilogy.

    Either way, I believe what SciFi did, although it was less philosophical than the books itself, was a “great” adaptation. The matter that it is a movie causes a dilemma. When one watches a movie, the attention span is much more short than reading, thus if it were a direct translation of all the philosophical discussions from the series, it would be boring to almost anyone. It is ironic, but it is true. That is why I believe God Emperor would probably never make it as a movie, as the entire book moves along at a crawl with every scene based around philosophical discussions. Movies and television is after all for entertainment and sometimes the reality of that fact overrides the necessity of staying completely true to translation.