Today on Blogcritics
Home » CD Review: Philip Glass – Symphony No. 6 (Plutonian Ode)

CD Review: Philip Glass – Symphony No. 6 (Plutonian Ode)

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The works from 1992 and beyond that Philip Glass has designated as his “symphonies” are a real mixed bag: There are the quite effective “Glass meets Bowie and Eno” first (Low) and fourth (Heroes), the rather dull second, the fantastic third (for strings only), and the sprawling pseudo-spiritual mess of the fifth (Choral). [A seventh (Toltec) and eighth have also been composed but not yet recorded.]

Though it may sound like the name of a Star Trek episode, Plutonian Ode is actually the title of the 1978 Allen Ginsberg poem that inspired Philip Glass’s sixth symphony. This isn’t the first time Glass has worked with the late “poet laureate of the Beat generation” and his texts: there was also the disastrous Hydrogen Jukebox, and the rather nice (and short) Echorus.

It is a curious and undeniable phenomenon that the more “interesting” Glass’ music gets, the less interesting it actually is. There is probably more harmonic and melodic content in the first 10 minutes of his Symphony No. 6 than in the entire five-hour duration of Einstein on the Beach, but it ends up sounding like second-rate Zemlinsky, third-rate Berg or fourth-rate Philip Glass. Repetition, gradual process, static harmonies, churning rhythms — these are the hallmark “minimalist” ingredients that make this music tick. The more Glass tinkers with this formula, the less effective the result. I suppose you could say the same thing about his fellow “former minimalists” Steve Reich and John Adams, but Glass’s music seems to be most affected by the “more is less” paradox. (Actually, of the “big four” founding fathers of minimalism, only Terry Riley has really managed to develop an effective and compelling new compositional style, in my opinion. He desperately needs a new website, however…)

Symphony No. 6 is written for full orchestra and soprano (the Bruckner Orchester Linz and Lauren Flanigan in this recording), and that’s the other problem — the soprano is almost always present, warbling near the top of her range throughout most of Plutonian Ode‘s 50-minute duration. This kind of singing is frankly just not something anyone should have to listen to (or perform) for this long, and now I know why there aren’t many other symphonies for soprano and orchestra out there.

Which brings us to the “bonus disc,” which I thought was supposed to be the music accompanied by Allen Ginsberg reading the Plutonian Ode text instead of the soprano singing it. Nope, she’s still there in the mix in addition to the overdubbed recorded voice of Ginsberg. It is simply too much to absorb and nearly impossible to listen to (and let’s face it: Ginsberg’s poetry reading isn’t exactly fun to hear for long stretches either.) It might have seemed like a good idea on paper, but it sounds awful and it’s ultimately a waste of time (and a waste of CDs — which seems sort of opposed to Plutonian Ode‘s ecological themes. Hmm…).

Despite all of the sixth symphony’s shortcomings, there is a wonderful chunk of pure Philip Glass to be found at the beginning of the third and final movement. Pulsing strings repeat ominous two-note patterns, additional instruments slowly join the texture, percussion accents kick in, and that old minimalist magic is in the air — then the spell is abruptly broken by that damned soprano, and we’re back to the overwrought operatic narrative again.

Yet somehow, that promising eight minutes embedded in this well-intentioned but otherwise unsuccessful piece confirms my hope that Glass still has some compelling music left in him. Let’s hope he’s saving it up and planning to blow all of our minds with his ninth symphony (but Phil — please beware the curse of the ninth!)

[from serenade in green]

serenade in green

Powered by

About SVF

  • http://www.livejournal.com/users/cmpwrite/ Connie Phillips

    Editor’s note: This article now has another venue for success – and more eyes – at the Advance.net Web sites, a site affiliated with about 12 newspapers.

    One such site is here.

  • nugget

    Why would you waste your time? Phillip Glass is plodding crap.

  • http://gratefuldread.net Natalie Davis

    Mileage varies, Mr./Ms. Nugget.