Today on Blogcritics
Home » Cancer Update a Hoax?

Cancer Update a Hoax?

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

A recent viral email scam circulated and credited Johns Hopkins University as its source, stating that there was a new “cancer update,” and claimed that doing something as simple as converting to a vegan diet would starve cancer cells.  It may have been believed because it had fluid tips that "you are almost positive you’ve heard somewhere, from someone, or even read before."

The email goes on to state that everyone has cancer cells in their bodies  that may become active approximately six to eight times in a person’s lifetime. It suggests that “when doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.” But according to Johns Hopkins response, “Cancer is a genetic disease resulting from a variety of mutations and alterations either inherited from our parents or, more commonly, acquired over time due to environmental exposures and behaviors, such as smoking and poor diet. These alterations turn off important cell growth regulators allowing cells to continually divide unchecked,” explains Luis Diaz, a clinician-scientist at the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics.

The email continues to give credit to the immune system’s superb ability to “destroy (cancer cells) and prevent from multiplying and forming tumors.”  Immune system health is no guarantee if a person has poor lifestyle habits, such as smoking, drinking, and stress – the average American routine; in fact, “The immune system simply does not recognize cancer. In its complexity, the cancer cell has learned to disguise itself to the immune system as a normal cell."  Infected cells send out danger signals setting the immune system in action.  Cancer cells do not, explains Elizabeth Jaffee, co-director of cancer immunology and a leading expert on cancer and the immune system, as written in the Hopkins article.

“When a person has cancer it indicates the person has multiple nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, environmental, food and lifestyle factors. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet and including supplements will strengthen the immune system.”  Yet dietary habits and lifestyle choices, such as smoking, contribute to the development of many human cancers, says Kimmel Cancer Center director William Nelson. "Our experts recommend a balanced diet as a way of reducing cancer risk.  In terms of supplements, Nelson points out that while they may help mediate vitamin deficiencies, taking doses above what the body needs provides no added benefit.”

With so many people stricken with cancer, and twice as many devoted to stopping it, it seems cruel to compromise hope with false data. Cancer has struck to close for comfort for millions of individuals, and to blatantly publish false information without care about the negative repercussions shows how limited our focus, as humans, truly can be.  “It has become such a problem, that the National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and individual cancer centers like the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center have posted warnings on their Web sites. Emails offering easy remedies for avoiding and curing cancer are the latest Web-influenced trend. To gain credibility, the anonymous authors falsely attribute their work to respected research institutions like Johns Hopkins”.

Several Johns Hopkins experts participated in the American Institute for Cancer Research Report on Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer. They recommend:

1. Be as lean as possible without becoming underweight.

2. Be physically active for at least 30 minutes every day.

3. Avoid sugary drinks. Limit consumption of energy-dense foods (particularly processed foods high in added sugar or low in fiber, or high in fat).

4. Eat more of a variety of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and legumes such as beans.

5. Limit consumption of red meats (such as beef, pork and lamb) and avoid processed meats.

6. If consumed at all, limit alcoholic drinks to 2 for men and 1 for women a day.

7. Limit consumption of salty foods and foods processed with salt (sodium).

8. Don't use supplements to protect against cancer.

9. Our experts recommend that people meet their nutritional needs through their food choices.

While vitamin supplements can be helpful in people with nutritional deficiencies, evidence suggests that supplementation above what the body can use provides no added health benefit. 

As a strong believer in alternative practice, it’s a passion to help people realize that health is achievable, but like everything else in life, it takes time and commitment.  If you work hard at it, and accept change as something we can embrace instead of fear, then together, we can make a difference in living life to its fullest.   For health to be unified, then it only makes sense to unite Western & Complimentary Alternative Medicine for a complete health and wellness synergy. For more detailed information about the email hoax, please see the Johns Hopkins website.

Powered by

About Sherize Kharyzma

  • Vladimir Petroci

    I can only agree with the author of this article. There are many hoax e-mails misleading people concerning cancer and other health issues. I believe in the very same prevention methods you´ve quoted. I would like to add only two that were omitted and I consider them very important because they are vastly underestimated. I am a practicing homeopathic physician and I ´ve found too obvious increase in detrimental health state of people during last two decades. I have seen more and more children with behavioral disorders, ADHD, autism, epilepsy, diabetes, allergies, rheumatism, cancer etc. And many parents mentioned that these problems started after vaccination. I would recommend to reevalutate vaccination programs as I see in my practice clear connection with immune a neurological damage after vaccinations. I suppose that this detrimental effect of vaccines isn´t caused only by the viruses themselves however also by additives in vaccines. And damaged immune system isn´t able to keep control over cancer cells.
    The second unseen danger I see in mobile radiation. In many studies was proved already that this radiation injures human cells – brain cells (holding mobile phones next to our heads) or reproductive cells and blood cells (when kept on the belt). I have stopped phoning with mobile next to my head. I´m using wire handsfree and holding mobile as far as possible from my body during the last 4 years. Since that time I´ve never felt the pain in my head I used to formerly very soon (10-15 seconds) after starting a mobile call. These effects are adding and can result in cancer of brain after years. I believe it´s better to be cautious then to regret later.
    Finaly I would just want to add that there is a good news for those suffering by cancer. I have seen already several cured cases in my practice via homeopathy. It´s a great method when used properly.

  • Joseph Putnoki

    To Vladimir Petroci: wired hands-free is also dangerous as the wire acts as an antenna and the earpiece also close to the brain. A female PhD. student researched it few years ago here in Australia. I got disabused from the belief hands-free sets are safe and tried on speaker phone setting. I demonstrated to my daughter holding a normal stethoscope over the speaker of the phone a safe distance away it worked perfectly and safely as the air-tube is non conductive to anything other then sound. Recently commercial sets available for phones with air-tube hands-free.

    Be well!

    Joseph.

  • Joseph Putnoki

    I am alarmed reading the report section of the article: some of the points listed are inaccurate as well needing some elaboration, the soundbite listing is misleading without that. Point 2: just be active means not much as it is nonspecific. Check out the P.A.C.E. exercise idea and be inspired and educated.
    Point 5: traditionally home-processed meat is not a problem. Neither is red meat per se,- we must be careful delineating that the nutritional quality and uncontaminated free-range protein sources what matters.
    Point 8: I don’t believe my eyes! How could Johns Hopkins say such a thing cathegorically?! The distinction needs be made between tested quality supplements and rubbish ones. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory supplements have a high impact on health especially the food supply is contaminated and denuded of nutrition putting us at risk. Inflammation is implicated in cancer as well as other diseases. This is a gross error!! Poi8nt 9:
    The recommendation just following poiunt8 here is counterproductive for people relying on advice of such oversimlicity and would try to get their nutritional needs met from food that is poor nutritional quality hence the harm. Fact is that if food production continued to be uncorrupted by profit-driven industrial scale that killed the bio-active layer the humus and animals fed poor and inapprppriate diet, decimated by sickenss needing antibiotics and the use of hormones to accelerate growth all end up in our bodies. Grazing animals imprisoned in confined feedlots fed inapproppriate food like oil seeds and corn that are unnatural to them adds to our own inflammatory diseases as their fat now contain extra omega 6 fat which is inflammatory, add the variety of cookin g oils most omega 6 and lacking the omega 3 anti inflammatory component from seafood that is also to be uncontaminated there is disaster.- Caged fowl suffer the same and some food suppliers mixed chicken manure with the pellets to increase bulk! Check out: Food Inc.
    The experts the article refers to can not be proud of their recommendations! I am not attacking but educating here. I expect this site’s integrity won’t block my conern-driven response.

    Be well!

    joseph.