Today on Blogcritics
Home » Boring Rats: Cultural Learnings of “CitiField” For Make Benefit Inglorious Nation of Mets Fans

Boring Rats: Cultural Learnings of “CitiField” For Make Benefit Inglorious Nation of Mets Fans

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

This New York Mets fan wanted to believe deep down to his orange and blue heart that the Mets organization would do the right thing when it came to naming the new ballpark.

I wrote an article earlier this year about this topic in which I proclaimed that the new park should be named Jackie Robinson Field. I think I stated my case clearly and succinctly, but there was probably never a chance for this to happen because the whole thing came down to dollars and cents. Notice the words “common” or “sense” are no where in sight.

Today there was a “groundbreaking” ceremony for the new park (despite the fact that construction work has been going on for months) outside the centerfield fence at Shea Stadium. This place will be called CitiField, though it will resemble the old home of the Dodgers, the legendary Ebbets Field, in order to evoke memories of the history of baseball in this town that has nothing to do with the Yankees (They have their own new stadium to contend with, but that’s another issue).

The Mets organization has caved in big time, greedily sucking up $20 million a year in order for Citigroup to have its name plastered on the façade of the new ballpark. For baseball purists like myself who find this offensive, we are supposed to be assuaged by a statue of Jackie Robinson that will be placed at the entrance of the new stadium. Yeah, right!

Of course, many Mets fans will not mind any of this, for they felt the fact that Robinson never played in a Mets uniform was more important that anything else. It mattered little to them that the Mets were the logical, emotional, and spiritual heirs to the Dodger legacy in New York; and Robinson, more than any other Dodger, embodied that gutsy type of player that became emblematic of the Bums’ heart and soul.

My uncle used to say, “You can beat the Dodgers, but you can never defeat them.” This was a man who got so drunk in 1955 after the Dodgers beat the hated Yankees that he was lost for three days. He drank “in every bar in Brooklyn” according to his story years later, then got on the subway and started to visit every one in Manhattan for good measure. How he ended up in a motel Teaneck, New Jersey, is still a mystery unlikely to ever be solved. Nevertheless, he and many Dodger fans bled Dodger blue and then cried a river of it when the team went out to California.

The Mets replaced this team in the hearts and minds of many of old Dodger fans, and the Mets’ roster had so many former Dodgers over the years that the connection seemed unquestionably obvious. Still, Mets fans were kind of hybrid, because many ex-Giants fans were also drawn into the Amazins’ web. The Mets logo on their caps comes straight from the Giants with its orange N and slightly bent Y. The marriage of that orange with Dodger blue gave us vibrant team colors that seemed to remind everyone of the history of the other two ball clubs while noting that this was the new team in town.

In response to today’s groundbreaking ceremony for CitiField, the first thing I screamed was “Boring!” This was followed by “Those dirty rats,” in my best James Cagney imitation. I could not believe the sound of the new name, the hollow ring of corporate shilling echoing across the East River all the way to the Citicorp Building with its slanted roof. CitiField? Man, that is not only boring but a less than amazing choice for the name of the new home of the Amazin’ Mets.

I was mortified, angry, and then wondered how others were feeling about this. I donned my Mets windbreaker, Mets cap, and old Mets shirt (1986 World Champions no less), and I went over to the commercial heart of Queens, the newly refurbished shopping mall known as Queens Center. Located on Queens Boulevard on the corner of Woodhaven Boulevard, Queens Center is minutes from the current home of the Mets, Shea Stadium. It was filled with people doing early holiday shopping, so I pushed the Mets cap back on my head, took out my pad and pencil, and started to stop people passing by in the first floor’s main lobby.

I asked one simple question: What do you think of the new name for the Mets’ new ballpark? Here is an example of some answers I got:

Jose (18- Corona, Queens): I think it stinks, man. It should be something like Keith Hernandez Park or something like that.

Bill (49- Elmhurst, Queens): What name? What is the name (I told him it is being named CitiField for Citibank)? Oh, that’s terrible. That’s a lousy name for a stadium. Why not name it Gil Hodges Stadium? The team would be nothing without that man!

Cesar (22- Long Island City): That’s cold, really cold. I’m a Yankees fan, but I think even Steinbrenner wouldn’t do that.

Mildred (84-Maspeth, Queens): Oh my, that is sort of odd. Why can’t they just call it “Shea” once again? Make things easy for us all.

Willie J. (33-Brooklyn): Just too corporate, son. I mean, it’s just too damned corporate. Damn!

Alyssa (19-Whitestone, Queens): I’d call it Jose Reyes Park or name it for David Wright. They’re hot, and I don’t know who this CitiField guy is anyway.

Chuck (53-Mineola, Long Island): I’ve got one word for it: sell-out.

In all, I asked thirty-two people this question, and not one of them liked the name for the Mets’ new ballpark (nor would any of them let me use their last names for the article). Everyone seemed surprised that the Mets would do this, that the team ownership would make such an obvious play for corporate sponsorship. There seemed to be shock, disappointment and, for many, simply embarrassment that the team they loved would have to play home games in a field so-named.

I got back in my car and drove around onto the expressway. It was a gloomy day today; the leaves that remained on the trees were clinging onto branches despite the robust wind blowing across Flushing Bay. I drove past good old crumbling Shea Stadium and felt a shiver scoot down my arms towards my hands on the steering wheel. I never realized how much I loved that ugly old place.

CitiField may one day prove to be the true home of the New York Mets the way Shea Stadium has been. So much of Mets history has taken place at Shea, so many Mets fans have spent long, hot afternoons and cold, windy nights there. It is a place where the present and past intermingle, with apparitions of our heroes long gone still shagging fly balls, tossing perfect strikes, and socking a homer on each swing from here to eternity.

CitiField is going to have a long way to go to find a similar place in the hearts of Mets fans.

About Victor Lana

Victor Lana has published numerous stories, articles, and poems in literary magazines and online. His books In a Dark Time (1994), A Death in Prague (2002), Move (2003), The Savage Quiet September Sun: A Collection of 9/11 Stories (2005) and Like a Passing Shadow (2009) are available online and as e-books. He has won the National Arts Club Award for Poetry, but has concentrated mostly on fiction and non-fiction prose in recent years. He has worked as faculty advisor to school literary magazines and enjoys the creative process as a writer, editor, and collaborator. He has been with Blogcritics since July 2005, has edited many articles, was co-head sports editor with Charley Doherty, and now is a Culture and Society editor. He views Blogcritics as one of most exciting, fresh, and meaningful opportunities in his writing life.
  • sal m

    nice job…

    the whole stadium naming thing is a sign of the times and it shows how guys who are in their 40s – like me – are already in the “too old to get it” bracket.

    we look at sports in a romantic way where the reality is that sports is just a business where there is little room for sentiment.

    and they could have at least made the lame attempt and name it “the citifield at jackie robinson stadium.”

  • http://journals.aol.com/vicl04/THESAVAGEQUIETSEPTEMBERSUN/ Victor Lana

    Exactly right, Sal! I was thinking the same thing. Something like Citigroup’s Jackie Robinson Field or maybe just the little red umbrella slanted over the word Robinson. Yes, it’s lame indeed, but at least it would be more in the spirit of the public interest.

    Oh, and we guys around 40 probably don’t get it. Not what they want us to get anyway. I’d take the old Channel 9 broadcasts (with Lindsay Nelson in his bright jacket, Bob Murphy blubbering lines, and Ralph Kiner’s funny inverting of sentences like “No bout a doubt it”) anyday over the too slick for its own good SNY.

  • the mayor

    Since there are a bunch of Mets fans reading this, anyone see the I’m Keith Hernandez Film? i’m keith hernandez – the movie