Today on Blogcritics
Home » Bookworm Rebellion

Bookworm Rebellion

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Rebellion is a poor excuse to deny oneself pleasure but that’s the only thing I can come up with when I look at the list of books I ought to have read but haven’t.

I should explain that my mother is a lady with definite literary tastes that she has sought to pass on to me for as long as I can remember. Part of her determination, I suspect, stems from the fact that it has been years since my brother so much as looked at a book and, even if he did, he’d read something she’d automatically classify as degenerate. I, on the other hand, read pretty much everything that comes my way, including flyers and restaurant menus. It’s a disease.

Ma got her first good shot at me when I was eight and bedridden – I couldn’t so much as make it to the bathroom without help so visits to the bookstore were out of the question. I still scribbled the names of the books I wanted to read (I was then in my Nancy Drew phase) which my mother took without comment and then completely ignored. Instead, she bought me what she thought I should be reading – The Scarlet Pimpernel, The Count of Monte Cristo (both unabridged), six of Shakespeare’s major plays (abridged) and, by way of light relief, The School at the Chalet.

I was furious. I was in a mood to begin the Supermysteries starring Nancy and the Hardy Boys. Thanks to the power of the blurb, I was convinced these were going to be the best adventure mysteries ever known to mankind, and here was my mother forcing fuddy-duddy literature down my throat in direct opposition to my stated wishes. I threw a tantrum – and Ma coolly closed the door behind her.

After I’d cheered up by imagining the shock and everlasting grief she would suffer when she came back and found me dead of whatever life-threatening disease that stalks ignored children, I defiantly picked up a Nancy Drew I’d read a dozen times already. This was India before the advent of cable television and in any case, my parents to this date don’t believe in spoiling their children with TVs in their bedrooms, so it was read or be bored. I was bored. Giving in to the inevitable, I chose The Count of Monte Cristo (it was lying closest to hand) to prove to myself that my mother knew nothing whatsoever about books. And I fell in love.

But ever since then, somewhere in my head I’ve automatically separated all books into Mom-approved vs. Me-approved. It doesn’t matter that they’re mostly the same, some books just scream “Mom-approved”. These, I will read eventually, but only when I have nothing left to read and will usually be borrowed from a library; to be bought only when I end up loving them, which happens about 80 percent of the time.

Here’re five awaiting their turn:

Far From the Madding Crowd by Thomas Hardy
How can I resist a book in which the main characters are named Gabriel Oak and Bathsheba Everdene? Yet somehow I’ve managed this astonishing feat.

Not only does its plot sound right up my alley (although to be honest, there is precious little that isn’t) but it is part of a literary period that I generally like. Not adore, like say, the early 19th century, but certainly like a great deal. In addition, the odd bits and pieces of Hardy that I’ve read over the years seem pretty good to me. Once, I even took it out of the library – and neglected it in favor of a Bronte re-reading orgy. Put Jane Eyre in front of me and I become a zombie that must feed on all things Bronte. Note to self: next time, borrow it along with some Anne Rice, I’d read anything to avoid reading Rice.

How Green Was My Valley by Richard Llewellyn
Welsh misery. No, no, that’s not my opinion of it, that’s the plot. I’ll freely admit that the sad stories aren’t my favorite. Not that I live to only read about cute li’l bunnies on uppers but as I’ve said before, I suspend my disbelief very easily. And the Welsh have a justly deserved reputation for beauty mixed with sadness.

You give me beauty mixed with sadness and by the end of the day all you’ll find a huddled husk of a human being under a sodden handkerchief. I mean, I saw the movie and Maureen O’Hara had me in tears. Last week, I read a Cold War thriller and bawled my head off reading about a fictional orphaned little boy who got exactly one paragraph in a novel full of violence and torture. Someday I’m going to give in, read this book and die of dehydration. I just know it.

The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway
I tried. I really did. Ma has been after me to read this book for years. She even bought it and put it on my table. This is the woman who regularly tries to make me stop reading and be, as she calls it, “sociable”. That’s how much she loves this book. So I did what every good child does – I cheated.

I rented the movie made by John Ford (a director I love) and starring Spencer Tracy (an actor I adore). End result? I fidgeted my way through the first five minutes and then switched it off so I could go solve some Math equations. I tried three separate times but never made it past the first 10 minutes. I figure it must have gotten better as the movie progressed considering the Oscars it won/was nominated for, but I haven’t seen it.

Of the book itself, I’ve never gotten past page one. The little I know, I read in critical papers that I scoured for tips with which I could throw my mother off the scent. So I know it’s about some dude named Santiago who ends up with a giant marlin’s skeleton. Oops, did I spoil it for you? Never mind, you’ll survive.

The most I can say about this book is that it has generated some of the craziest meta theories I ever read in which that dumb fish is everything from Christianity to God Himself. And the funniest fact I found out was that all the critics who loved it as a shining example of realism when it first came out, changed their minds once Hemingway began to pontificate about its layers of meaning. Ha ha, Hemingway. Couldn’t keep your mouth shut, could you? But thanks for proving once and for all that critical opinion is still just one person’s fallible opinion whether your find it in the pages of The New York Times or your neighborhood newsletter.

The Tropic of Cancer (and Capricorn) by Henry Miller
Okay, I can’t blame this one on my mother. She’d probably rather I never read this one. But it weighs heavily on my mind that I haven’t read a book that George Orwell thought was one of the most significant books to be written in the 20th century.

I mean, Henry Miller has always seemed a part of that intensely self-conscious, envelope-pushing crowd that inhabited the middle part of the last century (necessary evil, I guess) but I do know that these two books are ones that I should read. Actually, I think I should read at least one book by all the writers Anais Nin took as lovers but Henry Miller will do for now. Lawrence Durrell, your time will come.

Problem is, I get the blahs just thinking about it. This is mainly a reflection of my own prejudice – I’m not a big fan of 20th century literature. I personally feel a significant portion of it is pretentious humbug, written with one eye firmly fixed on being “important”.
There! I said it and I mean it. It is entirely possible that Miller is not one of those writers but a little voice in the back of my head remains dubious. Whatever be the case, a mere glimpse of it is enough to give me an instant case of ennui.

***

So that’s my secret list. I’m not proud of it, but I don’t particularly feel guilty about them either. Not until my mother wants to know what I’m currently reading anyway.

Powered by

About Amrita

  • http://philobiblon.co.uk Natalie Bennett

    This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net , which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States, and to Boston.com. Nice work!

  • dyrkness

    To read in a couple of years:”Remembrance of Things Past” by Marcel Proust- Just to brag that you’ve done it.
    “Confederacy of Dunces” by John Kennedy Toole- If you want a huge laugh.
    “Jude the Obscure”by Thomas Hardy- If you like Hardy.
    Buy a copy of “Being and Nothingness” by Jean Paul Sartre-You’ll never read it ,but your mother WILL be impressed.

  • http://www.rodneywelch.blogspot.com/ Rodney Welch

    John Ford did not direct The Old Man and the Sea. It was directed by John Sturges, with an uncredited assist from Fred Zinnemann and Henry King.

  • http://indiequill.wordpress.com/ Amrita

    Natalie – really? Thank you!

    Thanks for the suggestions, Dyrkness, I’ve read two of those: Confederacy of the Dunces and Jude the Obscure. the Proust and the Sartre I will buy and put on my bookshelf for my mother to view. They can join Simone de Beauvoir, another one of Ma’s favorites.

    Rodney – so he did, thanks for pointing it out. Now you know just how much attention I was paying to it :)

  • http://www.gpb-katie.blogspot.com Katie McNeill

    ‘Far From the Madding Crowd’ isn’t bad. It is a little hard to read because Hardy is very wordy, not Jane Austen wordy, something WAY past that. But worth the read, it’s a good book.

  • http://www.glosslip.com Dawn

    What a great post. Despite our separation by many an ocean, your childhood experience closely matched my own.

    It’s a good thing you didn’t go to school in states, Old Man And The Sea was required reading. Nancy Drew though, I read them all!

  • http://indiequill.wordpress.com/ Amrita

    Katie – I think I’d like Far from the Madding Crowd. Its just that I can’t make myself take that final plunge. I don’t have a problem with the prose. Just the image :)

    Dawn – thanks! I guess I’d have flunked it then :) You just hit upon why I love fiction in all its forms – coz a story is never completely culture specific. You can always relate.