The Higher Power of Scrotums: Book Drives Librarians Nuts!

As a music and film librarian, kids' books are not my area of expertise. Lately, however, controversy has gripped the library world over a kids' book, and like the wreck of a clown car, it's been impossible to look away.

This particular controversy is about the use of a word. A word which, in the opinion of some, utterly negates any value of the story. Although the book, The Higher Power of Lucky, impressed the Newbery Award Committee enough to honor it, this word is making it impossible for some librarians to read the book aloud, to recommend it to children, even to carry it in their collections.

The word is "scrotum."

The first I heard of this was a column in Publisher's Weekly, discussing the fact that certain library Listservs were aflame with this nightmare. I had to re-read the article several times to confirm that the controversy is, in fact, about the actual word "scrotum", and not the use of some other euphemism for the word scrotum more often found on made-for-cable series about cowboys or gangsters. Alas, the controversy really is about the word "scrotum."

"Because of that one word," said a school librarian, "I would not be able to read that book aloud." Some complained that the use of the word was totally unnecessary. Some implied that there were many other choices the author could have used instead.

I like contemplating this plethora of words the author could have used instead of scrotum, which is the anatomically accurate name for a specific body part. None come to mind that are not on that aforementioned list of premium cable euphemisms guaranteed to get your average 10-year-old mouth washed out with soap.

Armchair editing like this drives me bonkers. "The author ought to have used this word instead of that word." "The author used a word that was 'unnecessary,'" as if the selection of words, specific words in a specific order, is not the very definition of what it means to be an author. It's like saying it was unnecessary for Picasso to use so much blue paint. It's ridiculous to argue that an author used a word, any word, "unnecessarily." They used the words that they used.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for kati-irons

Article Author: Kati Irons

I am a film and music librarian for a public library system. Like many of my kind, I suffer from RKS, or Random Knowledge Syndrome. These musings are the inevitable end result of that condition.

Visit Kati Irons's author pageKati Irons's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - GL Hauptfleisch

    Mar 05, 2007 at 8:27 am

    Enjoyable piece, highly amusing. You know, for a article about, um, well...you know...

  • 2 - Katie McNeill

    Mar 05, 2007 at 10:14 am

    This is a great article! I had no idea any of this was going on and it just makes me want to read the book that much more.

  • 3 - ffakerson

    Mar 05, 2007 at 11:45 am

    Ugh! Next thing you know you'll be telling me that it's okay to use words like "ovary", "navel" or "duodenum" in children's stories.

  • 4 - jaz

    Mar 05, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    rectum?...damn nearkilled 'em"

    thanks for the fun read...

    /golfclap

    the Tao ofD'oh.

    (don't play the link in the library!)

  • 5 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    Mar 05, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    I cannot believe that a DOG's scrotum is the center of a controversy like this! Watching dogs is the way lots of kids learn about sex.

    Man!!!

  • 6 - Brad Blake

    Mar 05, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    If the dog was bit in the scrotum by a rattler, what are you going to say? He was bit in his "dingleberries", his "ballsack", his "genetailia", his "thing that hangs off his other thingy", his "thing the doctor pushes when he or she says 'cough'", or what?

    Undoubtedly the same uptight, right-wing, book burning types who elected U Know Who.

  • 7 - Natalie Bennett

    Mar 05, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!

    And definitely not bollocks. (Sorry, couldn't resist...)

  • 8 - MAOZ

    Mar 06, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    "Book Drives Librarians Nuts!"

    Pun intended?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs